131,013 research outputs found

    Where not to have a heart attack in Australia!: The Cardiac ARIA Index

    No full text
    abstract onlyAbstract not availableR. Clark, N. Coffee, K. Eckert, D. Turner, D. Coombe, J. Lawrence, S. Stewart, D. van Gaans, D. Wilkinson, A. Tonki

    The origin and development of brown earths on clay-with-flints and coombe deposits

    No full text
    Summary Field investigation of the origin and development of three brown-earth (sol Zessiwk) profiles has been supplemented by mechanical and mineralogical analyses and micromorphological studies. Two profiles, representative of the Batcombe and Winchester series, were on Clay-with-flints and the third, of the Charity series, on a Coombe deposit. Particle-size distribution and petrographic data strongly suggest that all three soils are derived in part from loess. The Charity is interpreted as an autoch- thonous profile formed in a Head deposit composed of chalky and flinty detritus mixed with loess by soliflwion, whereas the Batcombe and Winchester are two- stage profiles, formed in composite (non-uniform) parent materials resulting from the superficial incorporation of loess with the truncated or redeposited remains of previously weathered horizons with rotlehm and/or braunlehm fabrics. These Clay-with-flint substrata contain materials derived from Chalk and Eocene beds in varying proportions, weathered in Tertiary or interglacial periods and rearranged by periglacial agencies. Clay-with-flints sensu stricto, as represented in the Win- chester subsoil, has distinctive physical, mineralogical, and micromorphological characteristics, and appears to have originated by sub-surface solution of the Chalk and illuvial accumulation of clay derived for the most part from overlying deposits. The land surfaces concerned have probably been subjected to at least one alternation of periglacial and temperate conditions after the addition of loess. Hence the extent to which either profile reflects the influence of the contemporary environment is not readily assessed, but evidence is adduced that the upper horizons of each profile bear the impress of similar pedogenic processes, including eluviation of clay-size material and acidic weathering leading to the accumulation of vermiculite, modified in the Winchester by the effects of erosion and soil creep

    Cardiac ARIA: a geographic accessibility model to cardiac services in Australia

    No full text
    PowerPoint Presentation. Spatial Information Committee (SICOM), Surveying and Spatial Sciences Institute (SSSI) and Spatial industries Business Association (SIBA)Turner D, Coffee N, Clark RA, Eckert K, Coombe D, Lawrence J, Astles P, Stewart S, van Gaans D, Hugo G, Bamford E, Wilkinson D, Tonkin A. On behalf of the CARDIAC-ARIA project grou

    Where not to have a heart attack in Australia!

    No full text
    Poster - Subtitle: The Cardiac ARIA Index: Measuring accessibility to cardiac services in urban, rural and remote Australia using GISClark RA, Coffee N, Turner D, Eckert K, Coombe D, Bamford Errol, Hugo Graeme, Lawrence J, Stewart S, van Gaans D, Wilkinson D, Tonkin A., On behalf of the Cardiac ARIA project

    Mapping services to support a patient's journey through evidence-based care pathways after a cardiac event

    No full text
    Conference paper abstractAbstract not availableR.A. Clark, D. Wilkinson, N. Coffee, K. Eckert, P. Astles, M. Milligan, G. Pearce, S. Stewart, D. van Gaans, D. Turner, D. Coombe, C. Aroney, D. Chew, H. Grantham, P. Macdonald, A. MacIsaac, P. Thompson, W.Walsh, A. Tonkin, Onbehalf of the CARDIAC-ARIA project grou

    MeSH term explosion and author rank improve expert recommendations

    No full text
    Information overload is an often-cited phenomenon that reduces the productivity, efficiency and efficacy of scientists. One challenge for scientists is to find appropriate collaborators in their research. The literature describes various solutions to the problem of expertise location, but most current approaches do not appear to be very suitable for expert recommendations in biomedical research. In this study, we present the development and initial evaluation of a vector space model-based algorithm to calculate researcher similarity using four inputs: 1) MeSH terms of publications; 2) MeSH terms and author rank; 3) exploded MeSH terms; and 4) exploded MeSH terms and author rank. We developed and evaluated the algorithm using a data set of 17,525 authors and their 22,542 papers. On average, our algorithms correctly predicted 2.5 of the top 5/10 coauthors of individual scientists. Exploded MeSH and author rank outperformed all other algorithms in accuracy, followed closely by MeSH and author rank. Our results show that the accuracy of MeSH term-based matching can be enhanced with other metadata such as author rank

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    No full text
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    "Closing the R&D Gap, Evaluating the Sources of R&D Spending"

    No full text
    Both spending and tax policies have been implemented in the United States with the goal of stimulating private sector research and development (R&D). Karier questions whether current R&D policy, especially the research and experimentation tax credit, can contribute to closing the gap between nondefense expenditures on R&D in the United States and such expenditures in other countries, such as Japan and Germany. He also explores possible changes to our current R&D policy to make it more effective.

    A. D. Fricke, author

    No full text
    Black and white photograph of author, A. D. Fricke
    corecore