1,720,964 research outputs found
Antipsychotic drug exposure and risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
No full textBACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious disorder that may be complicated by pulmonary embolism (PE). Case reports and observational studies published in the early 1950s suggested that antipsychotic (AP) drugs may represent a risk factor, while observational studies conducted in the last 3 decades have provided conflicting results. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate whether AP drugs increase the risk of VTE and PE, and to ascertain the risk associated with first- and second-generation AP drugs and with exposure to individual drugs. DATA SOURCE: Relevant studies were located by searching MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Scopus up to March 2013. Reference lists of relevant papers and previous review articles were hand searched for other relevant studies. STUDY SELECTION: Based on the titles and abstracts of 1,386 citations, we identified 30 potentially relevant studies. Of these, 17 studies were eligible for inclusion and were included in the meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure of this meta-analysis was the occurrence of VTE or PE in individuals exposed to AP drugs in comparison with individuals unexposed or with past exposure to AP drugs. RESULTS: Antipsychotic exposure was associated with a significant increase in risk of developing VTE [odds ratio (OR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.86, 11 studies]. Exposure to APs did not significantly increase the risk of PE (OR 4.90, 95% CI 0.77-30.98, three studies), but the overall estimate was highly heterogeneous and the CI included the possibility of substantial harm. Random-effects meta-analysis on the risk of VTE associated with exposure to first- (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.28-2.37, six studies) and second-generation (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.74-2.52, five studies) APs revealed an increased risk. Only a few studies provided data on individual drugs, and estimates of effect were very uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic exposure in unselected patient populations may be associated with a 50% increase in the risk of developing VTE. However, between-study heterogeneity limits the confidence in this estimate. This increased risk similarly applies to first- and second-generation AP drugs
When important steps for a reliable meta-analysis are missing:the bevacizumab versus ranibizumab case
No full textletter to the edito
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Acute renal failure in patients treated with dronedarone or amiodarone: A large population-based cohort study in Italy
No full textPurpose: Causes of ARF are numerous including drugs. In 2012, spontaneous reporting showed a possible association between dronedarone and ARF. To further investigate such association, a retrospective cohort study on health-service claim databases was performed taking amiodarone as comparison. Methods: All patients receiving new prescription of amiodarone or dronedarone between September 2010 and December 2012 were selected. Cox regression models to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs), with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs), for dronedarone versus amiodarone were performed. HRs were calculated: (i) for the entire cohort; (ii) for matched cohorts using propensity score; (iii) and high-dimensional propensity score. Results: New users without previous episodes of ARF were 56,739 and 1761 on dronedarone and 54,978 on amiodarone. After 1:1 matching for propensity score, new users with dronedarone and amiodarone were 1467 and 1467, respectively. The cumulative incidence rate of ARF was 1.6 % (95 % CI 0.7-3.6 %) among dronedarone group and 2.3 % (1.0-5.1 %) among amiodarone group (p from log rank test=0.4884). The unadjusted HR of ARF was 0.34 (0.18-0.64) in dronedarone new users compared to amiodarone; in propensity score matched cohort, it was 0.75 (0.26-2.16), and in high-dimensional propensity score, it was 0.83 (0.25-2.73). Conclusions: This large community-based study did not confirm the signal of an increased nephrotoxicity from dronedarone compared to amiodarone. Nevertheless, given the increasing number of reports collected from pharmacovigilance databases worldwide on this association, it is advisable for clinicians and patients to be aware of the possible kidney damage due to dronedarone in order to improve clinical outcomes with early intervention
Safety profile of the direct oral anticoagulants: an analysis of the WHO database of adverse drug reactions
No full textAim: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown noninferiority to warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and a more promising safety profile. Unanswered safety aspects remain to be addressed and available evidence on the risk associated with these drugs are conflicting. In order to contribute to the debate on their safety profile, we conducted a comparative analysis of the reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with DOACs in VigiBase. Methods: Study based on reports of suspected ADRs held in VigiBase as at December 2014, in which a DOAC or warfarin were administered in patients with nonvalvular AF and listed as suspected/interacting drugs. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities was used to classify ADRs. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval were calculated. Results with P â¤Â 0.05 were statistically significant. Results: We retrieved 32 972 reports. We identified 204 ADRs with a ROR >1 (P â¤Â 0.05) and we focused on 105 reactions. Positive ROR emerged for DOACs and gastrointestinal haemorrhage compared with warfarin [(1.6 (1.47â1.75)], but no disproportionality with cerebral haemorrhage was found [0.31 (0.28â0.34)]. We identified other potential signals that have not been associated with DOACs previously. Conclusions: As well as premarketing authorization clinical trial studies, we found a reduced risk of intracranial haemorrhage, but an increased risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage in patients treated with DOACs compared to warfarin. We provide new data and we highlight several differences between the three novel oral anticoagulants, in the rate and type of ADRs occurred
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Antipsychotic drug exposure and risk of pulmonary embolism: a population-based, nested case-control study
Full text linkOnly three observational studies investigated whether exposure to antipsychotics is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, with conflicting results. This study was therefore carried out to establish the risk of pulmonary embolism associated with antipsychotic drugs, and to ascertain the risk associated with first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs, and with exposure to individual drugs
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
