1,721,308 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Abstract 398: Specific skeletal targeting of MMP-2 inhibitors for the treatment of bone metastatic breast cancer
Background. Bone metastatic breast cancer promotes extensive bone destruction/osteolysis and is currently incurable. Progression of the disease is critically dependent on cancer-bone interaction. Defining the molecular mechanisms underlying this communication can lead to the identification of new therapeutic targets that will eradicate the disease.
Rationale. Gene expression analysis and validation in human and murine specimens of bone metastases revealed that matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) such as MMP-2 are highly expressed in the bone metastatic microenvironment. Genetic ablation of MMP-2 highlighted the importance of this MMP in driving the growth of the osteolytic breast cancer lesions. We subsequently found that MMP-2 regulation of transforming growth factor β (TGF β) bioavailability was a major mechanism through which MMP-2 mediated this effect. These data support the rationale for the development of selective MMP inhibitors and imply that MMP-2 inhibition would be a successful strategy for the eradication of active bone metastatic breast cancer.
Methods. To address systemic dose limiting side effects noted in previous broad spectrum MMP inhibitor trials, we utilized a novel chemical approach to generate bone-targeting, highly selective MMP-2 inhibitors grafted onto a bisphosphonic backbone. In vitro, we tested the effect of BMMPIs at varying doses (1nM-100μM) on the viability of the major cellular components of the cancer-bone microenvironment, namely breast cancer cells (PyMT, 4T1), osteoblasts (MC3T3) and osteoclasts (primary monocytes and RAW 264.7). In vivo, mice were inoculated with either luciferase expressing 4T1 or PyMT (100,000) cells. Mice (n = 10/group) then received vehicle, zoledronate (1 mg/kg) or BMMPIs (1 mg/kg). Tumor growth was determined via luminescence quantitation. Cancer induced bone disease was measured ex vivo by μCT, Xray and histomorphometry. MMP activity in vivo and ex vivo was determined via an activatable MMP probe.
Results. BMMPIs significantly impacted the viability of breast cancer cells and osteoclasts in vitro (p<0.05) compared to control. In vivo BMMPIs significantly reduced the growth of bone metastatic breast cancer compared to control and the standard of care bisphosphonate, zoledronate. MMP activity was also lower in the BMMPI treated groups (using tumor burden to normalize values). μCT/Xray/Histomorphometry analysis also illustrated the significant beneficial effects of the BMMPIs in reducing the size of osteolytic lesions (up to 80% by μCT; p<0.05).
Conclusions. MMP-2 specific BMMPIs prevent bone metastatic breast cancer growth by impacting cancer cell viability and cancer induced osteolysis. Given that bisphosphonates are well tolerated in the clinical setting, we predict that BMMPIs could be translated to the clinical setting for the treatment and eradication of bone metastatic breast cancer
Abstract 4858: A novel strategy for the selective and tissue specific inhibition of MMPs in active breast cancer to bone metastases
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
