1,720,964 research outputs found
Acute infectious osteomyelitis in children: new treatment strategies for an old enemy
No full textBackground: Acute osteomyelitis still represents a significant clinical challenge, with an increasing incidence in paediatric population. A careful assessment and a rapid diagnosis with proper timing and choice of empirical antimicrobial therapy are necessary to avoid sequelae. The initial treatment should consist of empirical antibiotic therapy, to cover the major responsible pathogens in each age group. Data sources: We made a literature search with PubMed and Cochrane database from 2000 to 2019 in English, French, and Spanish languages using the key words “osteomyelitis, children, clinical, diagnosis, and treatment”. Results: The child’s clinical features, age, and the microbiological profile of the geographic area should be evaluated for diagnosis and in the choice of antibiotic treatment. Latest data suggest the administration of intravenous antibiotics for a short period, with subsequent oral therapy, according to the improvement of clinical status and inflammatory markers. For children older than 3 months, the shift to oral medications is already possible after a short course of intravenous therapy, until recovery. The timing for the shift from cefazolin to cephalexin or cefuroxime, intravenous clindamycin to oral clindamycin, and intravenous ceftriaxone + oxacillin to oral equivalents will be decided according to the improvement of clinical status and inflammatory markers. We also present the approach to osteomyelitis due to difficult pathogens, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-positive S. aureus infections. Conclusion: In this review, we present the current approach to the clinical diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis in childhood, with an update on recent recommendations, as a useful instrument to understand the rationale of antibiotic therapy
Lung Ultrasonography Scores in Preterm Infants and Respiratory Outcomes at Age 2 Years
Full text linkEchocardiographic assessment of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure by E/e' ratio: A systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textBackground: The reliability of echocardiographic methods for the assessment of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is still a matter of debate. Since its first description, the E/e' ratio has been regarded as a suitable method. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence of how E/e' effectively estimates PCWP and its diagnostic accuracy for elevated PCWP. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase databases for studies investigating the agreement between E/e' and PCWP, from inception to July 2022. We limited our research to studies published from 2010 to date. Retrospective studies and studies on non-adult population were excluded. Results: Twenty-eight studies, involving a total of 1964 subjects, were included. The pooled analysis of the studies showed a modest correlation between E/e' and PCWP. The weighted average correlation (r) is 0.43 (95% CI 0.37–0.48). We found no significant differences between reduced and preserved ejection fraction groups. Thirteen studies analysed the diagnostic accuracy of E/e' for elevated PCWP. The AUC of receiver operating characteristic curves for PCWP >15 mmHg was estimated in the interval 0.6–0.91. Discussion: E/e' appears to have a modest correlation with PCWP and an acceptable accuracy for elevated PCWP. (PROSPERO number, CRD42022333462)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Up-date sulla gestione del dolore del bambino in Pronto Soccorso
No full textPain is a frequent symptom in paediatric population, especially in the emergency setting; nevertheless pain is poorly managed in clinical practice. The present paper aims to give an up-to-date analysis concerning paediatric pain in emergency units, as regards epidemiology, assessment, measurement and treatment, through a detailed systematic revision of the literature and an on-going clinical trial assessment carried out by analysing the relevant data available until March 2018. Among the many paediatric pain scales for different ages and situations and according to their efficacy and efficiency, FLACC scale, Wong-Baker scale and FLACC-r or NCCPC-R scale are proposed. Moreover, pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies should always be considered; innovative strategies, new molecules and route of administration allow adequate therapies to be performed in many clinical situations. Emerging data suggest the need to carry out more research on pain prophylaxis, increase opioid drugs prescription in case of severe pain and reduce primary analgesia time. Therefore, an adequate management of pain in paediatric population in the emergency setting is still a goal to achieve. So, innovative organisational arrangements, training strategies addressed to health professionals, information and research are the instruments to imprint a real change in paediatric pain management in emergency units
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
