1,721,277 research outputs found
Safety of paracetamol in osteoarthritis: What does the literature say?
No full textOsteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of pain and physical disability in adults, and an increasingly common disease given its associations with aging and a growing obese/overweight population. Paracetamol is widely recommended for analgesia at an early stage in the management of OA, and, although frequently prescribed, evidence suggests the efficacy of paracetamol for OA pain is low. Furthermore, there have been recent concerns over the safety profile of paracetamol, with reports of gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic and renal adverse events. This narrative review summarizes recent literature on the benefits and harms of paracetamol for OA pain. Data on long-term paracetamol safety are derived largely from observational evidence, and are difficult to interpret given the potential biases of such data. Nonetheless, a considerable degree of toxicity is associated with paracetamol use among the general population, especially at the upper end of standard analgesic doses. Paracetamol is linked to liver function abnormalities and there is evidence for liver failure associated with non-intentional paracetamol overdose. Safety data for paracetamol use in the older population (aged >65 years) are sparse; however, there is some evidence that frail elderly people may have impaired paracetamol clearance. Given that the analgesic benefit of paracetamol in OA joint pain is uncertain and potential safety issues have been raised, more careful consideration of its use is required.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
CEA-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy in colorectal cancer
Full text linkIntroduction The adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has seen little improvement in terms of mortality of the disease in the last 40 years. There has been a resurgence in research into the use of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of CRC. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a useful target in cancer immunotherapy. The distribution of CEA in CRC differs from that in normal colorectal tissue. In normal colorectal tissue CEA is found only on the luminal surface of the cell which is inaccessible to intravenous antibody, whereas in CRC, CEA is found on all borders of the cell membrane and so becomes accessible to intravenous antibody. However, anti-CEA antibodies are prone to sequestration by circulating CEA. The anti-CEA antibody, PR1A3, binds only membrane-bound CEA and thus is able to overcome this problem. The aim of my research was to assess whether PR1A3 is suitable to be considered as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of CRC and what its mechanism of action might be. Methods The level of expression of CEA on a panel of cell lines was determined under different conditions using a solid-phase ELISA and FACS analysis. Humanized PR1A3 (hPR1A3) was assessed in a variety of in vitro cytotoxicity assays with colorectal cell lines expressing varying levels of CEA, using peripheral blood mononuclear cells and purified natural killer cells as sources of effector cells. The mechanism of action of PR1A3 was investigated by modifying the Fc fragment of the antibody and using antibodies to block the FcIIIA receptor on the effector cells. PR1A3 was also investigated in combination with a humanised A33 antibody. Results A panel of colorectal cell lines was found to have a range of CEA expression which could be upregulated in certain cell lines by growing the cell line beyond confluence and by treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent, 5-fluorouracil. The in vitro assays demonstrated hPR1A3 antibody-dependent and CEA-specific killing of tumour cell lines by human PBMC. The effect increased with increasing concentration of antibody and was lost by using the parent murine IgG1 PR1A3. Using 50μg/ml hPR1A3, tumour cell lysis was increased by more than 3-fold above spontaneous killing (p < 0.001) in a high CEA-expressing cell line. Both antibody-dependent and antibody-independent (spontaneous) killing was blocked by using whole antibody to the Fc-γIIIA receptor, although the spontaneous killing was restored when a F(ab')2 was used instead of whole antibody. hPR1A3 and the A33 antibody showed potential synergy when used in combination against a high-CEA and a moderate-A33 expressing cell line. Conclusion The monoclonal antibody hPR1A3 causes CEA-specific lysis of human colorectal cancer-derived cell lines in the presence of human PBMCs. This lysis is dependent on the dose of the antibody, requires a compatible Fc-receptor and is inhibited by blockade of the FcγIIIA receptor. These findings show that hPR1A3 can kill tumour cells by antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and implicate NK cells as a major contributor to this effect. The results support the development of hPR1A3 for therapy of colorectal cancer
- …
