1,721,050 research outputs found
Bien(s) commun(s) !
Bien(s) commun(s) et biens collectifs (Moyen Âge - époque moderne) Public assets and collective assets (Middle Ages - Modern age) Troisième école d'été d'histoire économique Third summer school in economic history * * * Publié le mardi 01 avril 2014 par Luigia Parlati RÉSUMÉ La troisième école d’été d’histoire économique, qui se réunira à Florence (Villa Finaly), les 27, 28 et 29 août 2014, aura comme thème « le(s) bien(s) commun(s) et les biens collectifs aux époques médiévale et modern..
Bien(s) commun(s) !
Bien(s) commun(s) et biens collectifs (Moyen Âge - époque moderne) Public assets and collective assets (Middle Ages - Modern age) Troisième école d'été d'histoire économique Third summer school in economic history * * * Publié le mardi 01 avril 2014 par Luigia Parlati RÉSUMÉ La troisième école d’été d’histoire économique, qui se réunira à Florence (Villa Finaly), les 27, 28 et 29 août 2014, aura comme thème « le(s) bien(s) commun(s) et les biens collectifs aux époques médiévale et modern..
Commun(s) et territoire(s)
Commun(s) et territoire(s) Espace des communs et communalisation des territoires Sciences Po Lyon, 19 juin 2018 (9h30 – 17h) Salle 301, Bâtiment pédagogique. Rue Appleton, 69007 Lyon Activité commune du master Ville et environnements urbains Séminaire de l’Axe Etudes urbaines UMR Triangle et de la composante LAURE de l’UMR Environnement, Ville, Société. Avec le soutien de l'Ecole Urbaine de Lyon et du Labex IMU Guillaume Faburel (Université Lyon 2, UMR Triangle, Ecole urbaine de Lyon) Clai..
Villes et commun(s) Cities and communes
Ces dernières années, de nombreux mouvements politiques et sociaux se sont structurés autour de la question des communs ou du commun, à l’image du « mouvement des places » à partir de 2011, en Tunisie, en Espagne, en Grèce, aux États-Unis ou en Turquie. La mobilisation de ces notions dans le champ de l’action politique a renouvelé l’attention des chercheurs : économistes, sociologues, politologues, géographes, urbanistes et historiens, entre autre. Nous souhaitons, lors de cet atelier doctoral, questionner cette généalogie de la recherche sur le/les commun(s) en études urbaines en réunissant les représentants de ces différentes disciplines des sciences humaines et sociales. Nous aimerions, par ce dialogue, travailler le rapport qui s’est instauré entre la réflexion sur l’espace public urbain et celle sur le/les commun(s)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
"Patrimoine et commun(s)" (InSitu, 2021)
Crédits : Alexis Beauclair / ministère de la Culture (Diri) Confrontant patrimoine et commun(s), dans ce numéro, nous cherchons à comprendre quels pourraient en être les points de contact, quels ordres de relation établir entre ces deux catégories, les territoires qu’elles investissent et les pratiques qu’elles induisent. En quoi notamment l’outillage théorique des communs permettrait-il de mieux penser et définir le patrimoine ? Symétriquement, à quoi nous sert le patrimoine dès lors qu’il..
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
