1,720,995 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Tool-support of socio-technical coordination in the context of heterogeneous modeling

    No full text
    The growing complexity of everyday life systems (and devices) over the last decades has forced the industry to use and investigate different development techniques to manage the many different aspects of the systems. In this context, the use of model driven engineering (MDE) has emerged and is now common practice for many engineering disciplines. However, this comes with important challenges. As set of main challenges relates to the fact that different modeling techniques, languages, and tools are required to deal with the different system aspects, and that support is required to ensure consistence and coherence between the different models. This paper identifies a number of the challenges and paints a roadmap on how tooling can support a multi-model integrated way of working

    Conceptualizing Digital Twins

    No full text
    Digital Twins are an emerging concept which is gaining importance in several fields. It refers to a comprehensive software representation of an actual system, which includes structures, properties, conditions, behaviours, history and possible futures of that system through models and data to be continuously synchronized. Digital Twins can be built for different purposes, such as for the design, development, analysis, simulation, and operations of non-digital systems in order to understand, monitor, and/or optimize the actual system. To realize Digital Twins, data and models originated from diverse engineering disciplines have to be integrated, synchronized, and managed to leverage the benefits provided by software (digital) technologies. However, properly arranging the different models, data sources, and their relations to engineer Digital Twins is challenging. We, therefore, propose a conceptual modeling framework for Digital Twins that captures the combined usage of heterogeneous models and their respective evolving data for the twin’s entire life-cycle

    MoDDiT 2021: 1stInternational Workshop on Model-Driven Engineering for Digital Twins

    No full text
    Digital twins (DT) are emerging and gaining attention in several disciplines to support different phases of the system life-cycle such as design-space exploration, runtime adaptation, and predictive maintenance of cyber-physical systems (CPSs). The term DT refers to the capability to clone an actual system into a virtual counterpart, that reflects the important properties of the system for a specific purpose. While benefits of DT have been demonstrated in many domains, their development, operation, and evolution, trigger major challenges. Part of these may be addressed from a Model Driven Engineering (MDE) perspective. MoDDiT'21 aims at bringing together researchers and practitioners in the DTs area to shape the future of systematically designing, engineering, evolving, maintaining, and evaluating DTs

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Conceptualizing Digital Twins

    No full text
    Properly arranging models, data sources, and their relations to engineer digital twins is challenging. We propose a conceptual modeling framework for digital twins that captures the combined usage of heterogeneous models and their respective evolving data for the twinâs entire lifecycle

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore