1,721,097 research outputs found

    Hypertension Caused by Disruption of the Circadian System:Blood Pressure Regulation at Multiple Levels

    No full text
    The chapter begins with explaining the effects of deleting of Cry genes which causes complete loss of circadian rhythms and leads to hyperaldosteronism and salt‐sensitive hypertension. Aldosterone induces reabsorption of ions and water in the kidneys, thereby increasing blood volume, leading to higher blood pressure. Since primary aldosteronism (PA) carries a higher risk of developing cardiovascular complications, accurate diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic hyperaldosteronism are particularly important. The pathological conditions of Cry‐null mice may play an important role in unraveling the pathophysiology of PA and salt‐sensitive hypertension in humans. Intriguingly, Miyajima et al. (1991) reports that muscle sympathetic nerve activity increases in essential hypertension and renovascular hypertension but decreases in PA. Baroreflex is very important for rapid regulation of blood pressure. The regulation of blood pressure is crucially important and, thus, is controlled by multilayered regulatory systems

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore