1,721,108 research outputs found

    Hepatocellular carcinoma and infections with multiple hepatitis viruses

    No full text
    Hepatitis B virus (HBV) plays a major role in liver carcinogenesis. HBV-DNA integration into cellular DNA provides some molecular basis for understanding the mechanisms of neoplastic transformation of the liver cell. Persistence of HBV-DNA episomic forms, necro-inflammation in the liver, and cirrhosis appear to be additional promoting factors. We studied the possible association between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the defective hepatitis D virus (HDV), a virus that requires the helper function of HBV. Patients infected with HDV and HBV develop HCC about 10 years earlier than those infected with HBV alone. Persistence of active HDV disease and low levels of "wild-type" HBV (i.e., secreting the hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]) are associated with progressive liver disease and HCC. Therefore, HBV replication, in spite of being inhibited by HDV, appears to play a major role sustaining HDV pathogenicity. Detection of antibody to the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in many HCC patients raises the important question whether HCV has oncogenic potential. Clinico-epidemiological data show that the most severe forms of liver disease in patients with multifactorial liver damage occur in those infected with HCV. The prevalence of HBV markers in patients with cirrhosis, HCC, and HCV infection is higher than in individuals with comparable age and other diseases. HBV-DNA integration occurring early during HBV infection can persist in those with and without detectable HBsAg in their serum. Therefore, one can speculate that in patients with integrated HBV-DNA and concurrent HCV infection, cirrhosis and HCC may develop more easily than in patients without HBV-DNA integration. HCV hampering the immune system also might play a role in the genesis of HCC. The evidence that multiple hepatitis viruses are more frequently associated with HCC than infections of one virus alone has important practical consequences. It warrants the identification of high risk patients so that they can be monitored frequently for early diagnosis and treatment

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore