1,720,955 research outputs found
Subjective breast cancer grading - Analyses of reproducibility after application of Bayesian belief networks
No full textOBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of Bayesian belief networks (BBNs) on the reproducibility of subjective breast cancer grading.
STUDY DESIGN: Twenty samples were analyzed for intraobserver and 128 samples for interobserver reproducibility using the Bloom-Richardson and Helpap grading systems. The expression of diagnostic features was evaluated subjectively, and for each a decision it was determined to what extent it represented one of the different outcomes. Evidence was then entered, for each diagnostic feature, into four different BBNs, recently described for breast cancer grading, in the form of a relative likelihood ratio vector.
RESULTS: With all cases considered, the use of decision support based on the Bloom-Richardson and Helpap grading systems did not improve intraobserver reproducibility. This was found to be 68% and 80% in subjective gradings, respectively, and 60% and 70% in the BBN-supported method. Interobserver reproducibility was not improved (58% and 70% in subjective gradings and 51-59% based on assessment with decision support). However, when only cases associated with high beliefs were considered, both intraobserver reproducibility (agreement rose from 68% to 93%) and interobserver reproducibility (agreement rose from 60% to 87%) of BBN-supported gradings exceeded the results of subjective assessments.
CONCLUSION: The results showed that the observers did not reach the same diagnosis (or grade) and that their observational assessment of histologic features lacked agreement. Since BBNs reflected only the data entered, poor agreement existed in the contribution to the final diagnostic belief by the different features and, ultimately, in belief in the final decision
Management of Uncertainty In Breast-cancer Grading With Bayesian Belief Networks.
No full textOBJECTIVE: To examine the potential of different constructs of Bayesian belief networks (BBN) to manage uncertainty in breast cancer grading.
STUDY DESIGN: We developed four networks, two based on Bloom-Richardson's and two on Helpap's grading systems. The function of the networks was based either on an expert's experience or frequency counts derived from subjective grading of a large number of samples. The four BBNs were tested on 20 specimens, and the resulting final beliefs were compared with the subjective gradings.
RESULTS: The BBNs showed agreement with the subjective gradings in 60-85% of cases. Different constructs of BBNs, however, differed in their performance. The mean beliefs in frequency-based networks were slightly higher than in experience-based networks. In addition, as compared with the Bloom-Richardson-based networks, the Helpap-based BBNs resulted in higher maximum beliefs but produced a larger fraction of discrepancies with the subjectively graded cases. Depending on the type of network, 65-90% of the BBN grades were associated with high beliefs.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that for reliable results, grading systems with more than three or four variables may be necessary. When based on relevant information, BBNs seem to have the potential to become a valuable method of assisting the pathologist in breast cancer grading
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
