13 research outputs found

    Proton structure from deep inelastic and diffractive scattering

    No full text
    We investigate various aspects of the proton structure in this thesis. The first addresses the distribution of the proton spin among its constituents, quarks and gluons. We derive the framework of distribution functions for these constituents and study the properties of the polarized distributions which describe the spin structure of the proton. A determination of the polarized distributions on the basis of present experimental data is presented and options for future measurements are critically evaluated. A second aspect under consideration is the phenomenology of hard diffractive electron-proton scattering. We show how diffractive interaction and hard scattering can be disentangled and suggest experimental tests for this interpretation. Finally, we illustrate how the knowledge on the proton structure can be used for the computation of observables in proton-antiproton collisions, confirming or extending our knowledge of the physics of elementary particles

    Microbial larvicide application by a large-scale, community-based program reduces malaria infection prevalence in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND\ud \ud Malaria control in Africa is most tractable in urban settlements yet most research has focused on rural settings. Elimination of malaria transmission from urban areas may require larval control strategies that complement adult mosquito control using insecticide-treated nets or houses, particularly where vectors feed outdoors.\ud \ud METHODS AND FINDINGS\ud \ud Microbial larvicide (Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti)) was applied weekly through programmatic, non-randomized community-based, but vertically managed, delivery systems in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Continuous, randomized cluster sampling of malaria infection prevalence and non-random programmatic surveillance of entomological inoculation rate (EIR) respectively constituted the primary and secondary outcomes surveyed within a population of approximately 612,000 residents in 15 fully urban wards covering 55 km(2). Bti application for one year in 3 of those wards (17 km(2) with 128,000 residents) reduced crude annual transmission estimates (Relative EIR [95% Confidence Interval] = 0.683 [0.491-0.952], P = 0.024) but program effectiveness peaked between July and September (Relative EIR [CI] = 0.354 [0.193 to 0.650], P = 0.001) when 45% (9/20) of directly observed transmission events occurred. Larviciding reduced malaria infection risk among children < or =5 years of age (OR [CI] = 0.284 [0.101 to 0.801], P = 0.017) and provided protection at least as good as personal use of an insecticide treated net (OR [CI] = 0.764 [0.614-0.951], P = 0.016).\ud \ud CONCLUSIONS\ud \ud In this context, larviciding reduced malaria prevalence and complemented existing protection provided by insecticide-treated nets. Larviciding may represent a useful option for integrated vector management in Africa, particularly in its rapidly growing urban centres

    Deep inelastic scattering of polarized electrons by polarized 3^3He and the study of the neutron spin structure

    No full text
    The neutron longitudinal and transverse asymmetries A1nA^n_1 and A2nA^n_2 have been extracted from deep inelastic scattering of polarized electrons by a polarized 3^3He target at incident energies of 19.42, 22.66 and 25.51 GeV. The measurement allows for the determination of the neutron spin structure functions g1n(x,Q2)g^n_1 (x,Q^2) and g2n(x,Q2)g^n_2(x,Q^2) over the range 0.03<x<0.60.03 < x < 0.6 at an average Q2Q^2 of 2 (GeV/c)2/c)^2. The data are used for the evaluation of the Ellis-Jaffe and Bjorken sum rules. The neutron spin structure function g1n(x,Q2)g^n_1 (x,Q^2) is small and negative within the range of our measurement, yielding an integral 0.030.6g1n(x)dx=0.028±0.006(stat)±0.006(syst){\int_{0.03}^{0.6} g_1^n(x) dx}= -0.028 \pm 0.006 (stat) \pm 0.006 (syst) . Assuming Regge behavior at low xx, we extract Γ1n=01g1n(x)dx=0.031±0.006(stat)±0.009(syst)\Gamma_1^n=\int^1_0 g^n_1(x)dx = -0.031 \pm 0.006 (stat)\pm 0.009 (syst) . Combined with previous proton integral results from SLAC experiment E143, we find Γ1pΓ1n=0.160±0.015\Gamma_1^p - \Gamma_1^n = 0.160 \pm 0.015 in agreement with the Bjorken sum rule prediction Γ1pΓ1n=0.176±0.008\Gamma^p_1 - \Gamma ^n_1 = 0.176 \pm 0.008 at a Q2Q^2 value of 3 (GeV/c)2/c)^2 evaluated using αs=0.32±0.05\alpha_s = 0.32\pm 0.05

    Identification of behaviour change techniques and engagement strategies to design a smartphone app to reduce alcohol consumption using a formal consensus method

    No full text
    Background: Digital interventions to reduce excessive alcohol consumption have the potential to have a broader reach and be more cost-effective than traditional brief interventions. However, there is not yet a strong evidence base on their ability to engage users or on their effectiveness. Objective: This study aimed to identify the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and engagement strategies most worthy of further study by inclusion in a smartphone application (app) to reduce alcohol consumption, using formal expert consensus methods. Methods: The first phase of the study consisted of a Delphi exercise with three rounds. It was conducted with seven international experts in the field of alcohol and/or behaviour change. In the first round, experts identified BCTs most likely to be effective at reducing alcohol consumption and strategies most likely to engage users with an app; these were rated in the second round; and those rated as effective by at least four out of seven participants were ranked in the third round. The rankings were analysed using Kendall’s W coefficient of concordance, which indicates consensus between participants. The second phase consisted of a new, independent group of experts (n=43) ranking the BCTs that were identified in the first phase. The correlation between the rankings of the two groups was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results: Twelve BCTs were identified as likely to be effective. There was moderate agreement among the experts over their ranking (W=.465, χ2(11)=35.77, P<.001) and the BCTs receiving the highest mean rankings were self-monitoring, goal-setting, action planning, and feedback in relation to goals. There was a significant correlation between the ranking of the BCTs by the group of experts who identified them and a second independent group of experts (Spearman’s rho=.690, P=.01). Seventeen responses were generated for strategies likely to engage users. There was moderate agreement among experts on the ranking of these engagement strategies (W=.563, χ2(15)=59.16, P<.001) and those with the highest mean rankings were ease of use, design – aesthetic, feedback, function, design – ability to change design to suit own preferences, tailored information, and unique smartphone features. Conclusions: The BCTs with greatest potential to include in a smartphone app to reduce alcohol consumption were judged by experts to be self-monitoring, goal-setting, action planning, and feedback in relation to goals. The strategies most likely to engage users were ease of use, design, tailoring of design and information, and unique smartphone features

    The co-production of gender and technology in HIV prevention research

    No full text
    Vaginal microbicides are pharmaceutical products in development that are designed to reduce the sexual transmission of HIV in women. They are commonly known as a `woman-controlled technology' and tool for women's empowerment, and form part of a burgeoning field of clinical research into new biotechnologies for HIV prevention. Little work has critically examined how such research and new technologies are produced, and how they in turn contribute to the construction, maintenance or deconstruction of gender relations. Adopting a Foucauldian understanding of power and discourse, and using theoretical insights from science and technology studies (STS), this research explores the coproduction of gender and technology through the case study of vaginal microbicides. 'T'his account of the relations between science, society and technology draws on empirical research conducted in the UK and Zambia with the pharmaceutical industry, trialists, trial participants and trial communities. It interrogates the techniques of power through which transnational scientific networks are mobilised to test new products, such as microbicides, and how these affect scientific practices, knowledges and identities across socio-geographic boundaries. It attends to the potential multiplicity of interventions in diverse contexts, calling into question the presumed stability and singularity of both the randomized controlled trial and vaginal microbicides. This research makes an empirical contribution to knowledge about new biomedical technologies for HIV prevention, detailing the transformation that may occur when technologies travel from their site of development to their site of use. It provides a detailed analysis of the interaction between gender performativity and science in action, challenging the sense of `gendered' technologies for a `feminized' epidemic. Theoretically, it contributes to debates about the role of social theory in public health research and reconstructivist agendas in STS, concluding with a model for greater collaboration between health technology designers, evaluators, critics, and users

    Evaluation of the Quality of Guidelines for the Treatment of Symptoms of Dengue, Zika, and Chikungunya and Management of the Aedes aegypti Mosquito

    No full text
    1. INTRODUCTION Arboviruses such as Dengue, Zika, and Chikungunya are caused by the DENV, ZIKV, and CHIKV viruses, respectively[1-3]. Symptoms include fever, skin rash, nausea, vomiting, conjunctivitis, easy bleeding, body pain, and hematological changes. Severe complications like Guillain-Barré syndrome, neuropathies, myelitis, hemorrhage, fetal malformations, miscarriages, premature births, and death can occur[2-4]. The treatment for these diseases is symptomatic, generally involving the use of paracetamol or dipyrone, hydration, and rest[5]. Transmission occurs mainly through mosquitoes of the Aedes genus in tropical and subtropical regions, including around 128 countries[6]. In Brazil, the Aedes aegypti mosquito is the primary vector, and mosquito control is the most effective measure to curb the spread of these arboviruses, mainly by eliminating standing water sites necessary for the hatching of eggs[3, 5]. To guide effective public policies in disease treatment and vector control, it is crucial to gather relevant scientific evidence and develop guiding documents known as guidelines[7]. Health guidelines are important tools for improving the quality of healthcare services[8-10] and can be divided into clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and health system guidelines (HS). CPGs provide recommendations based on systematic reviews to optimize patient care[11, 12], while health system guidelines offer solutions for policy development in health systems[13-15]. To ensure the quality in the development and purpose of these guidelines, tools have been developed since the early 1990s. Today, the most widely used are from the AGREE collaboration: AGREE II[16]– methodological quality of clinical guidelines; AGREE REX[17]– excellence of recommendations; and AGREE HS[18]– methodological quality of health system guidelines. 1.1 JUSTIFICATION According to the latest epidemiological bulletin from the Ministry of Health, covering the first 7 epidemiological weeks of 2024, the number of probable dengue cases has tripled compared to the same period in 2023, primarily affecting the Southeast, Midwest, South, and North regions of Brazil, with around 700,000 Brazilians affected by the disease. For the same period, approximately 40% of the Chikungunya cases from 2023 have already been recorded (about 150,000)[19]. Thus, considering the dengue epidemic, the large number of Chikungunya cases, and a likely increase in Zika cases, effective sanitary measures are needed to combat these arboviruses, either through mosquito management or symptom treatment, justifying the comparison and verification of the methodological quality and recommendations of existing guidelines. 1.2 OBJECTIVES 1.2.1 General Objective To evaluate the methodological quality and recommendations for the treatment of symptoms of Dengue, Zika, and Chikungunya and for the management of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. 1.2.2 Specific Objectives Evaluate and compare the methodological quality of the guidelines. Evaluate and compare treatment recommendations for diseases and mosquito management. 1. Guzman, M.G., et al., Dengue: a continuing global threat. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2010. 8(12 Suppl): p. S7-16. 2. Krauer, F., et al., Zika Virus Infection as a Cause of Congenital Brain Abnormalities and Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Systematic Review. PLoS Med, 2017. 14(1): p. e1002203. 3. Weaver, S.C. and W.K. Reisen, Present and future arboviral threats. Antiviral Res, 2010. 85(2): p. 328-45. 4. de Araújo, T.V.B., et al., Association between microcephaly, Zika virus infection, and other risk factors in Brazil: final report of a case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis, 2018. 18(3): p. 328-336. 5. Soni, S., et al., Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika: The Causes and Threats of Emerging and Re-emerging Arboviral Diseases. Cureus, 2023. 15(7): p. e41717. 6. Brady, O.J., et al., Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2012. 6(8): p. e1760. 7. Schunemann, H.J., et al., Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2014. 186(3): p. E123-E142. 8. Woolf, S.H., Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments. Arch Intern Med, 1990. 150(9): p. 1811-8. 9. Woolf, S.H., et al., Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ, 1999. 318(7182): p. 527-30. 10. Harris, R.P., et al., Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med, 2001. 20(3 Suppl): p. 21-35. 11. IOM, Institute of Medicine. Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice, Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust., ed. R. Graham, et al. 2011, Washington (DC): National Academies Press. 12. IOM, Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program, ed. M.J. Field and K.N. Lohr. 1990, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 168. 13. Ako-Arrey, D.E., et al., Health systems guidance appraisal--a critical interpretive synthesis. Implement Sci, 2016. 11(1): p. 9. 14. Ako-Arrey, D.E., et al., Health system guidance appraisal--concept evaluation and usability testing. Implement Sci, 2016. 11: p. 3. 15. Brouwers, M.C., et al., Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS. Health Res Policy Syst, 2018. 16(1): p. 51. 16. Brouwers, M.C., et al., AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ, 2010. 182(18): p. E839-42. 17. Florez, I.D., et al., Assessment of the quality of recommendations from 161 clinical practice guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation–Recommendations Excellence (AGREE-REX) instrument shows there is room for improvement. Implementation Science, 2020. 15(1): p. 79. 18. Brouwers, M.C., et al., Assessment of health systems guidance using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation - Health Systems (AGREE-HS) instrument. Health Policy, 2019. 123(7): p. 646-651

    Pharmaco-epidemiology of artemisinin-based combination therapy in the context of impact evaluation of artemether-lumefantrine on malaria morbidity and mortality during programmatic implementation in rural Tanzania

    No full text
    In sub-Saharan Africa previous efforts to control malaria have proved less successful mostly due to prolonged use of less efficacious mono-therapy drugs to which Plasmodium falciparum has developed drug resistance. In most parts of malaria endemic regions chloroquine (CQ) was found to be poorly effective for several decades but it was still being prescribed until recently. In Tanzania, for instance, P.falciparum was already resistant to CQ in more than 60% of all P. falciparum positive patients back in the late 80’s but was still used until when it was possible to replace it by sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) in 2001. SP is anti-folate sulfa based anti-malaria drug that was adopted as an interim first line drug by many malaria endemic countries as there was no affordable immediate alternative to CQ. Elsewhere in sub- Saharan Africa Zambia was the first African country to embrace policy change with efficacious anti-malaria combination therapy using Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) back in 2004 after support from global funds. Until 1990, the past three decades have had a sustained global focus on malaria control strategy with the aim of intensifying developing intervention tools. This was preceded by specific eradication efforts of the 1940s, which were intensified in most parts of Southern Europe and America. It was during this period that the global focus on malaria sustained a great deal of change. In that same period therefore, the main focus was on technical issues as well as research and development for new tools, that could lead to advances in drug and vaccine development alongside vector control strategies. There were medium term gains during this period but at the same time some challenges were recorded. Key among these challenges was the fragmented global efforts, whereby there was total loss of a broad based global focus to a joint strategy on the fight against malaria. This resulted in little global support with no clear roadmap for developing states, mostly in Sub Saharan Africa, to establish adequate health systems and primary health care for comprehensive malaria management. These challenges resulted in to overuse of ant-malaria mono-therapies that were cheaply available in most of these countries and led to development of parasite resistance to drugs with far reaching consequences. Towards the mid of 1990s, the combination of a worsening malaria situation and emerging positive technical developments led to renewed global focus on malaria control. It is for the same reason that in 2000 the global head of states developed a joint position to address the global disease burden most affecting developing countries as part of the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) of global programme on development to be achieved by 2015. Two goals were developed to improved health for the Under Five (U5e.i, MDG4 and MGD6. MGD4 sets target to reduce child mortality by two third by 2015 while MGD6 aims at combating malaria and other major infectious diseases (HIV and TB) by year 2015 as compared to baseline 1990. As the results of the launch of these global initiatives, a number of new strategies and tools against malaria have been developed and existing ones sharpened to better address the problem. Not later than beginning of last decade, Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) emerged as potential therapeutically efficacious proven tool to combat malaria. In the face of growing anti-malarial drug resistance due to the use of mono-therapies, ACT has placed itself as a novel treatment for malaria treatment. Use of insecticide Treated Mosquito bed-Nets (ITN) has also been advocated. With the support of Global Health Partners, ITN have been made available to the vulnerable persons within endemic communities. Support to control malaria has exceeded 1000millionayearbutmalariastillexertsathreattotheU5andexpectantmothers.InTanzaniaACTasthefirstlineantimalariadrugwasintroducedinlate2006,scaledforcountrywideusein2007.TheACTimplementationsinTanzaniabearsomesimilaritieswithapproachesinotherAfricancountriesbuttherearestillmajordifferences.TanzaniahasahomogenoushealthsystemthatfacilitatedtherolledoutofthemalariacontrolprogrammeaspartoftheprimaryHealthCare(PHC)system.ThiswasalsosupportedbytheevidencegeneratedfromtheNorthSouthresearchcollaborationsthatinformedpolicymakers.GovernmentandnonstatecollaborationwithinTanzaniawaskeyininformingtheaboveprocess.InsomecasescrossboardercollaborationamongeconomicblocksofEastAfricaandSouthernAfricanDevelopmentCommunity(SADC)haveprovidedinsightsintothecontrolofmalariainthecontinent.SomeofthenovelimplementationtoolsdevelopedandtestedinTanzaniahavebeenappliedintherestofSubSaharanmalariaendemicstatesandoftensupportedtheglobalcampaignagainstmalaria.InTanzania,politicalstabilityandpeaceforoverfourdecadeshasalsomadeiteasyforquickpolicychangeandscaleupofcontrolinterventionsusingACTthiscouldhavebeendifferentinneighboringnationslikeUganda,Sudan,MozambiqueandDemocraticrepublicofCongowhichhaveexperiencedcivilstrifeduringthisperiod.TanzaniahasemergedasoneofthefewAfricancountriesthatprovidedthegroundtotestsomeofthemostsuccessfulmalariacontrolinterventionsfortherestoftheworldtoupscale.TheKilomberoRiverbasininIfakaraTanzaniaisaknowncradleformalariaendemicity.Severalnovelinterventionshavebeentestedforefficacyandthenevaluatedforimpactduringrolloutasprogrammes.MostfindingspresentedinthisthesishavebeenlargelyderivedfromtheIfakaraDemographicsurveillancesystemamongotherstudysitesinTanzania.ThisworkhasprovidedmajorinsightsintothepolicychangeforACTanditsimplementationatthenationalscale.TheaimofthePhDworkpresentedherewastocontributetoabetterunderstandingoftheimpactoftheACTintroductiononmalariamorbidityandmortalityinruralTanzaniaandtomonitoritslongtermsafetywhenusedatcountrywide.Availabilityofbaselineefficacyprofile,mobilizationofstakeholdersincludingparticipatingcommunitiesandpreparednessamongresearchersacceleratedpolicyimplementationinmostpartofTanzaniarightfromtheonsetofpolicyinception.FindingsfromtheInterdisciplinaryMonitoringProjectofAntimalariaCombinationTherapy(IMPACT)andEastAfricanNetworkforMonitoringAntimalariaTreatment(EANMAT)programmesasdescribedinthisthesishaveprovidedevidencethatinformedpolicy.Theinvivostudieshaveshownthatartemetherlumefantrine(AL)wasnearly100ChainReaction(PCR)inchildrenU5yearsintheyearspriorpolicychange.WehavealsoshownthatinreallifesituationitispossibletobuildcomprehensiveresearcherspolicymakerspharmaceuticalindustrypartnershiptoimplementstrategiesformonitoringsafetyandproperuseofantimalariadrugsasreportedintheprogrammeArtemetherLumefantrineInVulnerablepatients:ExploringhealthImpact(ALIVE).Wewereable,forthefirsttimeintheALIVEprojecttodescribeacomplianceofmorethan95forALinarandomizedstudyconductedatcommunitylevel.WehavereporttheestablishmentofapharmacovigilancesysteminaruralcommunitythatalsotestedforthefirsttimetheuseofmobilephonetechnologywithSMStoreportantimalarialseriousadverseevents(SAE).TheALIVEprojectprovidedanassessmentoftheimpactofACTandothermalarialinterventionsonchildmortalityaswellasonmalariatransmission.Itdemonstratedthatforevery10parasitaemia[IRR=0.52;95underfivemortalitywhenadjustedforotherkeyfactors[IRR=0.89;95ALIVEalsoshowedtherelationshipofkeycontextualfactorswithmalariainterventionsandU5childmortality.Foodsecuritywasmajordeterminantofunderfivechildmortality;notablythericeyieldswasresponsiblefornearly36CI=0.54to0.75].Asfarasmalariatransmissionisconcerned,weobservedparallela65reductionofparasiteprevalenceinasymptomaticcommunitymembersofstudyareaascomparedtobaselinein2006beforeACTwasintroducedinthestudypopulation.Lastly,theseeffectsarelikelytobesustainablesincetheefficacyofAL,asevaluatedwithaninvivostudyconductedoneyearafterimplementationhasremainedabove96Kilomberovalleyinspiteofitswidescaleuse.Thefindingsofthisthesisattesttheimportanceofpolicychangeinmalariacontrolsupportedbyevidencegatheredfromoperationalresearches.Thelessonslearnedfromthisworkwillberelevanttosimilarinterventionslocallyandonaglobalscaleinmostmalariaaffectedcommunities.WehavealsolearntthatsafetyandcomplianceissuesofmedicinalproductsthataredeployedatlargescalesuchasACTshouldbemonitoredandmanagedbystrongpartnershipinvolvingtheMinistryofHealthanditallieddepartments,thepharmaceuticalindustrieswhenpossible,theresearchersandmostimportantlywithfullparticipationandsupportoflocalleadershipandcommunities.We,recommendthatthispartnershipgainsupportfromotherglobalhealthpartnerstoensuresafetyofdrugsthroughrigorousmonitoringofitsuseandlonglifespan.Capacitybuildingofmarketandpolicyimplementersisanothercriticalaspectthatshouldbegivenpriority.Wealsorecommendthatresourcesbemadeavailabletostrengthenthehealthsystem(humanresource,HealthInformationSystemandInfrastructure)inordertogainsustainedresultsinmalariacontrol.Thiswillfurthercreateenablingenvironmentandacriticalmassofscientistsandpublichealthexpertstospearheadantimalariapolicyimplementationsproperlyandmonitoritontimelybasis.Asoutlinedinthiswork,asuccessfulcampaignagainstmalariacanberealizedthroughcombiningeffortsofresearchers,policymakers,globalhealthdevelopmentpartnersandcommunities.Thispartnershiphasleadtoreallifetimeachievementsrelatedprogrammes,suchasthe1940smalariaeliminationcampaigninSardiniaIslandofItaly.Zusammenfassung:InSubsaharaAfrikahabensichdiebisherigenBemu¨hungenzurBeka¨mpfungvonMalariaalswenigerfolgreicherwiesen,davorallemaufeineMonoMedikamenteTherapiegesetztwurde,gegenwelchePlasmodiumfalciparuminzwischenResistenzenentwickelthat.ObwohlsichChloroquin(CQ)indenletztenJahrzehntenindenmeistenMalariagebietenalsnurteilweisewirksamerwies,wurdeesnochbisvorkurzemeingesetzt.Bereitsindenspa¨ten1980erJahrenwurdenbeispielsweiseinTansaniainu¨ber60P.falciparumpositivenPatientenResistenzengegenu¨berCQfestgestellt.TrotzdemwurdeCQerstimJahre2001durchSulfadoxinPyrimethamin(SP)ersetzt.SPisteinMalariaMedikament,dasinvielenMalariaendemischenLa¨ndernalsZwischenlo¨sungeingefu¨hrtwurde,danochkeineerschwinglicheAlternativezuCQzurVerfu¨gungstand.EtwazurselbenZeiterlebteSambiaalserstesafrikanischesLandeinenPolitikwandelundfu¨hrte2004mithilfeglobalerFo¨rdermitteldieeffizientereArtemisininbasedCombinationTherapy(ACT)ein.Zwischen1960und1990wurdederFokusaufeinenachhaltigeMalariaKontrollStrategiegelegt,diezumZielhatte,dieInterventionsstrategienderEntwicklungsla¨nderzufo¨rdern.Vorangegangensindinden1940erJahrenspezifischeMaßnahmenzurAusrottung,wobeiderSchwerpunktauftechnischeFragensowieaufdieForschungundEntwicklungvonneuenWerkzeugengelegtwurde,diezuFortschritteninderMedikamentenundImpfstoffentwicklung,sowieinderVektorkontrollstrategieha¨ttenfu¨hrensollen.EsgabmittelfristigeinigeErrungenschaften,gleichzeitigentstandenaberindiesemZeitraumauchneueHerausforderungen.EineHauptherausforderunglagindenglobalenBemu¨hungen,dieeinefokussierte,breitangelegteStrategiezurBeka¨mpfungvonMalariaerschwerte.DieswarauchderGrund,weshalbesdenLa¨ndernsu¨dlichderSaharanichtgelang,eineangemesseneGesundheitsversorgungaufzubauen.SiewarendeshalbimmernochvonveraltetenMonoTherapienabha¨ngig,diezwarindenmeistenLa¨ndernzugu¨nstigenPreisenzurVerfu¨gungstanden,aberwegenderenchronischenU¨berbeanspruchungzurEntwicklungvonResistenzenbeitrugen.Mitteder1990erJahrefu¨hrtedieverschlechterteSituationbezu¨glichMalariazusammenmitdensichabzeichnendenpositiventechnischenEntwicklungendazu,dassdieKontrollevonMalariawiederindenglobalenFokusru¨ckte.AusdemgleichenGrundversuchtenimJahr2000verschiedeneStaatschefseinegemeinsamePositionbezu¨glichderStrategiezurBeka¨mpfungderwichtigstenKrankheitenzufinden.ZweiZielewurdeninFormderMillenniumDevelopmentGoals(MDG)konkretformuliertundsolltenbis2015erreichtwerden.DasMGD4bestanddarindieKindersterblichkeitbezogenaufdasJahr1990umzweiDrittelzusenken,wa¨hrendMGD6daraufabzieltedieBeka¨mpfungvonMalariaundanderenschwerenInfektionskrankheiten(z.B.HIVundTB)bezu¨glichderSituationin1990deutlichzuverbessern.DieseglobalenInitiativenvermochteneinigebereitsbestehendenInterventionsstrategiengegenMalariazuverbessernundhalfenzurEntwicklungeinerReiheneuerInstrumenteundStrategienbei.ErstzuBeginndesletztenJahrzehntskamdieArtemisininbasedCombinationTherapy(ACT)alseineAlternativezudenMonoTherapienauf,welchewegenderwachsendenResistenzimmermehranWirksamkeiteinbu¨sste.DesWeiterenwurdeauchfu¨rdenEinsatzvoninsecticidetreatedmosquitobednets(ITNs)pla¨diert.DankderUnterstu¨tzungvonGlobalHealthPartnern,konntendieITNsnunfu¨rvieleinMalariaendemischenGebietenlebendePersonenzuga¨nglichgemachtwerden.Obwohlbisherja¨hrlichu¨ber1000MillionenUS 1000 million a year but malaria still exerts a threat to the U5 and expectant mothers. In Tanzania ACT as the first line anti-malaria drug was introduced in late 2006, scaled for country wide use in 2007. The ACT implementations in Tanzania bear some similarities with approaches in other African countries but there are still major differences. Tanzania has a homogenous health system that facilitated the rolled out of the malaria control programme as part of the primary Health Care (PHC) system. This was also supported by the evidence generated from the North-South research collaborations that informed policy makers. Government and non-state collaboration within Tanzania was key in informing the above process. In some cases cross boarder collaboration among economic blocks of East Africa and Southern African Development Community (SADC) have provided insights into the control of malaria in the continent. Some of the novel implementation tools developed and tested in Tanzania have been applied in the rest of Sub-Saharan malaria endemic states and often supported the global campaign against malaria. In Tanzania, political stability and peace for over four decades has also made it easy for quick policy change and scale up of control interventions using ACT this could have been different in neighboring nations like Uganda, Sudan, Mozambique and Democratic republic of Congo which have experienced civil strife during this period. Tanzania has emerged as one of the few African countries that provided the ground to test some of the most successful malaria control interventions for the rest of the world to up-scale. The Kilombero River basin in Ifakara Tanzania is a known cradle for malaria endemicity. Several novel interventions have been tested for efficacy and then evaluated for impact during roll out as programmes. Most findings presented in this thesis have been largely derived from the Ifakara Demographic surveillance system among other study sites in Tanzania. This work has provided major insights into the policy change for ACT and its implementation at the national scale. The aim of the PhD work presented here was to contribute to a better understanding of the impact of the ACT introduction on malaria morbidity and mortality in rural Tanzania and to monitor its long-term safety when used at country wide. Availability of baseline efficacy profile, mobilization of stakeholders including participating communities and preparedness among researchers accelerated policy implementation in most part of Tanzania right from the on-set of policy inception. Findings from the Interdisciplinary Monitoring Project of Anti-malaria Combination Therapy (IMPACT) and East African Network for Monitoring Anti-malaria Treatment (EANMAT) programmes as described in this thesis have provided evidence that informed policy. The invivo studies have shown that artemetherlumefantrine (AL) was nearly 100% efficacious after controlling for re-infection by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in children U5 years in the years prior policy change. We have also shown that in real life situation it is possible to build comprehensive researchers-policy makers-pharmaceutical industry partnership to implement strategies for monitoring safety and proper use of anti-malaria drugs as reported in the programme Artemether-Lumefantrine In Vulnerable patients: Exploring health Impact (ALIVE). We were able, for the first time in the ALIVE project to describe a compliance of more than 95% using a complex six-dose regimen for AL in a randomized study conducted at community level. We have report the establishment of a pharmacovigilance system in a rural community that also tested for the first time the use of mobile phone technology with SMS to report anti-malarial serious adverse events (SAE). The ALIVE project provided an assessment of the impact of ACT and other malarial interventions on child mortality as well as on malaria transmission. It demonstrated that for every 10% increases in ITN coverage, there was a 48% reduction in the annual community parasitaemia [IRR=0.52; 95% CI=0.38 to 0.73]. It also showed that, compared to a period when anti-malaria first line was SP, ACT was responsible for nearly 11% annual decreases in under five mortality when adjusted for other key factors [IRR= 0.89; 95% CI=0.79 to 1.0]. ALIVE also showed the relationship of key contextual factors with malaria interventions and U5 child mortality. Food security was major determinant of under five child mortality; notably the rice yields was responsible for nearly 36% reduction in annual mortality [IRR=0.64; 95% CI=0.54 to 0.75]. As far as malaria transmission is concerned, we observed parallel a 65% reduction of parasite prevalence in asymptomatic community members of study area as compared to baseline in 2006 before ACT was introduced in the study population. Lastly, these effects are likely to be sustainable since the efficacy of AL, as evaluated with an invivo study conducted one year after implementation has remained above 96% in the Kilombero valley in spite of its wide scale use. The findings of this thesis attest the importance of policy change in malaria control supported by evidence gathered from operational researches. The lessons learned from this work will be relevant to similar interventions locally and on a global scale in most malaria affected communities. We have also learnt that safety and compliance issues of medicinal products that are deployed at large scale such as ACT should be monitored and managed by strong partnership involving the Ministry of Health and it allied departments, the pharmaceutical industries when possible, the researchers and most importantly with full participation and support of local leadership and communities. We, recommend that this partnership gain support from other global health partners to ensure safety of drugs through rigorous monitoring of its use and long life span. Capacity building of market and policy implementers is another critical aspect that should be given priority. We also recommend that resources be made available to strengthen the health system (human resource, Health Information System and Infrastructure) in order to gain sustained results in malaria control. This will further create enabling environment and a critical mass of scientists and public health experts to spearhead anti-malaria policy implementations properly and monitor it on timely basis. As outlined in this work, a successful campaign against malaria can be realized through combining efforts of researchers, policy makers, global health development partners and communities. This partnership has lead to real life time achievements related programmes, such as the 1940s malaria elimination campaign in Sardinia Island of Italy. ---------- Zusammenfassung: In Subsahara-Afrika haben sich die bisherigen Bemühungen zur Bekämpfung von Malaria als wenig erfolgreich erwiesen, da vor allem auf eine Mono-Medikamente-Therapie gesetzt wurde, gegen welche Plasmodium falciparum inzwischen Resistenzen entwickelt hat. Obwohl sich Chloroquin (CQ) in den letzten Jahrzehnten in den meisten Malariagebieten als nur teilweise wirksam erwies, wurde es noch bis vor kurzem eingesetzt. Bereits in den späten 1980er Jahren wurden beispielsweise in Tansania in über 60% der P.falciparum-positiven Patienten Resistenzen gegenüber CQ festgestellt. Trotzdem wurde CQ erst im Jahre 2001 durch Sulfadoxin-Pyrimethamin (SP) ersetzt. SP ist ein Malaria- Medikament, das in vielen Malaria-endemischen Ländern als Zwischenlösung eingeführt wurde, da noch keine erschwingliche Alternative zu CQ zur Verfügung stand. Etwa zur selben Zeit erlebte Sambia als erstes afrikanisches Land einen Politikwandel und führte 2004 mithilfe globaler Fördermittel die effizientere Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) ein. Zwischen 1960 und 1990 wurde der Fokus auf eine nachhaltige Malaria-Kontroll-Strategie gelegt, die zum Ziel hatte, die Interventionsstrategien der Entwicklungsländer zu fördern. Vorangegangen sind in den 1940er Jahren spezifische Maßnahmen zur Ausrottung, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf technische Fragen sowie auf die Forschung und Entwicklung von neuen Werkzeugen gelegt wurde, die zu Fortschritten in der Medikamenten- und Impfstoffentwicklung, sowie in der Vektorkontrollstrategie hätten führen sollen. Es gab mittelfristig einige Errungenschaften, gleichzeitig entstanden aber in diesem Zeitraum auch neue Herausforderungen. Eine Hauptherausforderung lag in den globalen Bemühungen, die eine fokussierte, breit angelegte Strategie zur Bekämpfung von Malaria erschwerte. Dies war auch der Grund, weshalb es den Ländern südlich der Sahara nicht gelang, eine angemessene Gesundheitsversorgung aufzubauen. Sie waren deshalb immer noch von veralteten Mono- Therapien abhängig, die zwar in den meisten Ländern zu günstigen Preisen zur Verfügung standen, aber wegen deren chronischen Überbeanspruchung zur Entwicklung von Resistenzen beitrugen. Mitte der 1990er Jahre führte die verschlechterte Situation bezüglich Malaria zusammen mit den sich abzeichnenden positiven technischen Entwicklungen dazu, dass die Kontrolle von Malaria wieder in den globalen Fokus rückte. Aus dem gleichen Grund versuchten im Jahr 2000 verschiedene Staatschefs eine gemeinsame Position bezüglich der Strategie zur Bekämpfung der wichtigsten Krankheiten zu finden. Zwei Ziele wurden in Form der Millennium Development Goals (MDG) konkret formuliert und sollten bis 2015 erreicht werden. Das MGD 4 bestand darin die Kindersterblichkeit bezogen auf das Jahr 1990 um zwei Drittel zu senken, während MGD 6 darauf abzielte die Bekämpfung von Malaria und anderen schweren Infektionskrankheiten (z.B. HIV und TB) bezüglich der Situation in 1990 deutlich zu verbessern. Diese globalen Initiativen vermochten einige bereits bestehenden Interventionsstrategien gegen Malaria zu verbessern und halfen zur Entwicklung einer Reihe neuer Instrumente und Strategien bei. Erst zu Beginn des letzten Jahrzehnts kam die „Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy“ (ACT) als eine Alternative zu den Mono-Therapien auf, welche wegen der wachsenden Resistenz immer mehr an Wirksamkeit einbüsste. Des Weiteren wurde auch für den Einsatz von „insecticide treated mosquito bed-nets“ (ITNs) plädiert. Dank der Unterstützung von Global Health Partnern, konnten die ITNs nun für viele in Malariaendemischen Gebieten lebende Personen zugänglich gemacht werden. Obwohl bisher jährlich über 1000 Millionen US für die Bekämpfung von Malaria ausgegeben wurden, stellt Malaria weiterhin eine grosse Bedrohung vor allem für Kinder unter 5 Jahren und für schwangere Frauen dar. ACT wurde als Haupt-Malaria-Medikament in Tansania gegen Ende 2006 eingeführt und 2007 auf das ganze Land ausgeweitet. Die Realisierung dieses Projekts hatte einige Ähnlichkeiten mit Ansätzen in anderen afrikanischen Ländern, jedoch gibt es nach wie vor grosse Unterschiede. Das homogene Gesundheitssystem in Tansania im Allgemeinen und das „Primary Health Care“ (PHC) System im Speziellen erleichterten die Realisierung dieser Malaria-Programme erheblich. Auch die Erkenntnisse, die im Rahmen der Nord-Süd- Forschungskooperationen gewonnen wurden, die Kollaborationen zwischen NGOs und der Regierung, sowie die Bereitstellung der erforderlichen Nachweise durch die politischen Entscheidungsträger, führten schliesslich zu einer erfolgreichen Umsetzung. Zusätzlich ermöglichte die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den wirtschaftlichen Blöcken Ostafrikas und der „Southern African Development Community“ (SADC) neue Einblicke in die grenzüberschreitende Kontrolle von Malaria. Einige dieser in Tansania neu entwickelten und praxis-erprobten Instrumente wurden auch in anderen Staaten südlich der Sahara angewandt und dabei oft von globalen anti-Malaria Kampagnen unterstützt. Die politische Stabilität und der Frieden in Tansania während mehr als vier Jahrzehnten haben ein schnelles Umdenken in der Politik und die landesweite Ausdehnung der ACTKontrollstrategie überhaupt erst ermöglicht. Viele benachbarte Länder wie Uganda, Sudan, Mozambique und die Demokratische Republik Kongo erlebten im gleichen Zeitraum viele Unruhen. Tansania hat sich als eines der wenigen afrikanischen Länder nicht gescheut sich dem Rest der Welt für Grossversuche der heute erfolgreichsten Interventionen gegen Malaria zur Verfügung zu stellen. Der Kilombero River Basin in Ifakara Tansania wird als Wiege von Malaria bezeichnet. Etliche neue Interventionen wurden auf ihre Wirksamkeit getestet und evaluiert. Die in dieser Arbeit präsentierten Ergebnisse wurden hauptsächlich aus verschiedenen Studienzentren in Tansania zusammengetragen, wobei der grösste Teil aus dem „Ifakara Demographic Surveillance System“ stammt. Die vorliegende Arbeit gewährt Einblicke in das von Tansania verfolgte Programm zur landesweiten Umsetzung der ACT. Das Ziel der Doktorarbeit ist es, einen Beitrag zum besseren Verständnis der Auswirkungen, welche die Einführung der ACT auf die Malaria Morbidität und Mortalität hatte, beizutragen und die langfristige Sicherheit im landesweiten Einsatz zu überwachen. Die erfolgreiche Einbindung der Akteure, insbesondere der teilnehmenden Communities, sowie die grosse Bereitschaft unter den Forschern beschleunigten die Umsetzung der neuen Richtlinien von Beginn an. Die auf Beweisen basierten Erkenntnisse, die aus dem “Interdisciplinary Monitoring Project of anti-malaria Combination Therapy” (IMPACT) und dem “East African Network for Monitoring anti-malaria Treatment” (EANMAT) gewonnen wurden, werden in die Entwicklung von neuen Richtlinien einfliessen. Die in vivo Studien haben gezeigt, dass Artemether-Lumefantrin (AL) nach Kontrolle der Reinfektion durch Polymase Chain Reaction (PCR) bei Kindern unter fünf Jahren nahezu 100% wirksam war. Wir haben ebenfalls bewiesen, dass es durch eine intensive Zusammenarbeit zwischen Forschung, Politik und der pharmazeutischen Industrie möglich ist, auch unter Realbedingungen Strategien für die Überwachung der Sicherheit und dem sachgemäßen Gebrauch von Antixviii Malaria-Medikamenten umzusetzen. Das „Exploring Health Impact“ Programm (ALIVE) war als erstes Programm überhaupt in der Lage, in einem randomisierten Beurteilungsdesign auf Community-Level eine Compliance von mehr als 95% zu einer komplexen 6 Dosen Therapie von Artemether-Lumefantrin (AL) aufzuzeigen. In Kapitel 5 wird berichtet, dass „ALIVEpharmacovigilance“ afrikaweit die erste community-based Pharmakovigilanz-Studie ist, welche auch die Verwendung von SMS als Überbringer von schweren Nebenwirkungen untersucht. Das Projekt ALIVE gewährt sowohl einen Einblick in die Auswirkungen von ACT und anderen Interventionen auf die Kindersterblichkeit und die Prävalenz. ALIVE hat gezeigt, dass eine Erhöhung der ITN Abdeckung um 10% eine Verringerung von 48% jährlicher Malariabedingten Parasitämie auf kommunaler Ebene erzielt [IRR=0.52; 95% CI=0.38 to 0.73]. Es wurde ebenfalls gezeigt, dass im Vergleich zu der Zeit, als in erster Linie noch SP verwendet wurde, ACT für ungefähr 11% der jährlichen Reduktion der Mortalität verantwortlich war, wenn man für andere wichtige Faktoren stratifiziert [IRR = 0,89, 95% CI = 0,79 bis 1,0]. Des Weiteren wurde beobachtet, dass die Erhöhung der Ernährungssicherheit, insbesondere der Reiserträge, für fast 36% der Reduktion der jährlichen Mortalität von Kindern unter 5 Jahren verantwortlich war [IRR = 0,64, 95% CI = 0,54 - 0,75]. Hinsichtlich der Übertragung von Malaria wurde parallel eine Parasiten-Prävalenz Reduktion von 65% bei asymptomatischen Community-Mitgliedern im DSS in Ifakara aufgezeichnet, im Vergleich zum Ausgangswert im Jahr 2006 als ACT eingeführt wurde. Darüber hinaus wurden diese Auswirkungen als nachhaltig beurteilt, da die Wirksamkeit von AL, wie anhand einer in vivo Studie ein Jahr nach Umsetzung gezeigt, im Kilombero-Tal bei über 96% liegt. Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit unterstreichen die Bedeutung des politischen Wandels in der Malariabekämpfung. Dazu gehört die Forschung als systematischer Weg, um das Gesundheitssystem zu stärken und sich in der Malaria Bekämpfung innerhalb eines endemischen Entwicklungslands zu engagieren. Die Erfahrungen aus dieser Arbeit werden relevant sein für Malaria-betroffene Gebiete vor Ort und auf globaler Ebene. Wir haben auch gelernt, dass die Sicherheit und Compliance von Arzneimitteln, die, wie ACT, im großen Maßstab eingesetzt werden überwacht und verwaltet werden muss. Dabei sollten das Gesundheitsministerium und verwandte Fachbereiche sowie die pharmazeutische Industrie und Forschungspartner, als auch die örtliche Führung miteinbezogen werden. Wir empfehlen, dass diese Partnerschaft von globalen Gesundheitsorganisationen unterstützt wird. Die rigorose Überwachung der ordnungsgemässen Verwendung von Medikamenten würde zu einem besseren Verständnis betreffend der Fragen der Sicherheit von Arzneimitteln führen, sowie deren Lebensdauer verlängern. Ein weiterer kritischer Aspekt, welcher den Vorrang eingeräumt werden sollte, ist der Aufbau von Kapazitäten. Wir empfehlen, dass Ressourcen zur Verfügung gestellt werden um das Gesundheitssystem in Malaria-endemischen Gebieten zu stärken (human resources, Health Information und Infrastruktur), um nachhaltige Ergebnisse in der Malariabekämpfung zu erreichen. Damit werden günstige Rahmenbedingungen geschaffen um eine wirksame, regelmässig überwachte, Anti-Malaria- Politik zu implementieren. Wie in dieser Arbeit erläutert, kann eine erfolgreiche Kampagne gegen Malaria durch die Bemühungen der Forscher, politischer Entscheidungsträger, globaler Entwicklungs-Partnern und der lokalen Gemeinden realisiert werden. Eine solche Partnerschaft hat bereits Erfolge erzielt, wie das Beispiel in den 1940er Jahren der Malari
    corecore