306,133 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Planorbacochlea graemei Shea & Colgan & Stanisic 2012, n. sp.
No full textPlanorbacochlea graemei n. sp. (Figs 15F; 16F; 17F; 18E; 19F) Etymology. Named for the late Graeme Annabel who first collected this species and who made a significant contribution to our knowledge of the terrestrial micro-snails of eastern Australia. Diagnosis. Shell very small, pale orange-brown, biconcave with weakly depressed spire. Protoconch sculpture spiral consisting of 26 prominent, closely spaced, beaded spiral cords and weak, closely spaced radial ridges becoming more pronounced toward the protoconch-teleoconch boundary. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, orthocline to weakly prosocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 45–68. Umbilicus wide cup-shaped. Type material examined. Holotype. AM C.462745, Speers Point, Lake Macquarie Reserve, above end of Farm Street, NSW (32 965° S, 151 632° E), 3.viii.2005, coll. G. Annabell. Paratypes. AM C.462740, AM C.462743, AM C.472882, same data as holotype. Description. Shell very small, pale orange-brown, biconcave with weakly depressed spire. Whorls 3.00–3.75, tightly coiled, the last inflated and descending in front. Sutures strongly impressed. Shell diameter 2.66–3.25 mm (mean 2.80 mm), height 1.44–1.58 mm (mean 1.50 mm), H/D 0.49–0.55 (mean 0.53). Protoconch flat, of one whorl, diameter 0.35–0.48 mm. Protoconch sculpture spiral consisting of 26 prominent, closely spaced, beaded spiral cords and weak, closely spaced radial ridges becoming more pronounced toward the protoconch-teleoconch boundary. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, orthocline to weakly prosocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 45–68 (mean 54), width of rib interstices on the first teleoconch whorl greater than or equal to width of six ribs; on the penultimate whorl greater than or equal to width of six ribs; each rib with two or more periostracal blades with overlapping thickenings. Interstitial sculpture of low prominent microradial ribs and low, weaker microspiral cords forming weak beads at their intersection; number of microradials between ribs on the first teleoconch whorl 9–18; on first quarter of body whorl 12; height of microspirals very low. Aperture broadly ovately-lunate. Parietal callus prominent, transparent. Umbilicus wide cup-shaped, diameter 0.74–0.99 mm (mean 0.85 mm), D/U 3.30–3.62 (mean 3.40). Based on 5 measured adults. Anatomy unknown. Distribution and habitat. Known only from the type locality at Speers Point, in littoral rainforest; recovered from litter. Remarks. Planorbacochlea graemei n. sp. is readily separated from all others in the P. hawkesburyana complex by the combination of very widely spaced radial ribs on the teleoconch and fewer spiral cords on the protoconch.Published as part of Shea, M., Colgan, D. J. & Stanisic, J., 2012, 3585, pp. 1-109 in Zootaxa 3585 on page 5
Planorbacochlea watagan Shea & Colgan & Stanisic 2012, n. sp.
No full textPlanorbacochlea watagan n. sp. (Figs 15E; 16E; 17E; 18D; 19E) Etymology. Named for the Watagans Mountains, west of Lake Macquarie, NSW. Diagnosis. Shell very small, light brown, biconcave with weakly depressed spire. Protoconch sculpture strongly spiral consisting of 22 prominent, closely spaced, beaded spiral cords; and weak, closely spaced radial ridges becoming more pronounced toward the protoconch-teleoconch boundary. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, orthocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 174–228. Umbilicus open, U-shaped. Type material examined. Holotype. AM C.309158, Olney State Forest, at The Basin camping area, upper Wollombi Brook, Watagan Mountains, SW of Newcastle, NSW (33° 06’ 14” S, 151° 13' 46” E), 16.i.2000, coll. M. Shea. Paratypes. AM C.472886, same data as holotype. Wyong State Forest: AM C.162128, AM C.319715, AM C.319920 (33° 13’ 58”'S, 151° 20’ 23” E). Watagan National Park: AM C.309157 (33° 50’ 0” S, 151° 26’ 01” E). Description. Shell very small, light brown, biconcave with weakly depressed spire. Whorls 3.0–3.75, tightly coiled, the last inflated and descending in front. Sutures strongly impressed. Shell diameter 2.87–3.42 mm (mean 3.25 mm), height 1.56–1.79 mm (mean 1.66 mm), H/D 0.49–0.56 (mean 0.51). Protoconch flat, of 1.25 whorls, diameter 0.45–0.58 mm. Protoconch sculpture strongly spiral consisting of 22 prominent, closely spaced, beaded spiral cords and weak, closely spaced radial ridges becoming more pronounced toward the protoconch-teleoconch boundary. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, orthocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 174–228 (mean 188), width of interstices on the first teleoconch whorl equal to width of three to less than six ribs; on the penultimate whorl equal to width of three to less than six ribs; each rib with two or more periostracal blades with overlapping thickenings. Interstitial sculpture of low prominent microradial ribs and low, weaker microspiral cords forming weak beads at their intersection; number of microradials between ribs on the first teleoconch whorl 4–6; on first quarter of body whorl 4–7; height of microspirals variable. Aperture broadly ovately-lunate. Parietal callus prominent, transparent. Umbilicus open, U-shaped, diameter 0.81–1.06 mm (mean 0.85 mm), D/U 3.24–3.74 (mean 3.62). Based on 6 measured adults. Anatomy unknown. Distribution and habitat. Wyong-Watagan Mountains district, west of Wyong and Lake Macquarie, NSW; in subtropical rainforest to understorey vine thicket in sclerophyll forest, in litter, under logs and rocks. Remarks. Planorbacochlea watagan n. sp. differs from P. hawkesburyana by having fewer spiral cords on the protoconch and more numerous radial ribs on the teleoconch.Published as part of Shea, M., Colgan, D. J. & Stanisic, J., 2012, 3585, pp. 1-109 in Zootaxa 3585 on pages 48-5
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Modern Airline Pilots\u27 Quandary: Standard Operating Procedures—to Comply or Not to Comply
No full textModern airline pilots are tasked every flight with the safe and efficient operation of highly automated airliners in today’s complicated global and economic environments. Airlines have developed standard operating procedures (SOP) for normal, abnormal, and emergency operations. These procedures serve as a script for crews to follow. These procedures are designed by airlines to ensure that aircraft are operated in the (1) most safe, (2) most efficient, and (3) most on-time manner. For the most part pilots will comply with SOP, but when they (1) don9t agree with SOP, (2) don9t understand SOP or the risks associated with not complying with SOP, or (3) don9t feel adequately trained to know what SOP is, it is difficult to motivate them to comply. Airlines have the means to measure compliance through Flight Operations Quality Assurance (FOQA) and Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA). The purpose of this research is to determine if increased understanding, knowledge and awareness of the risk of noncompliance with SOP increase airline pilots’ compliance with SOP. This research explores data from line checks at a major US airline that was gathered in pursuit of understanding what drives SOP compliance. Baseline data was gathered and analyzed to determine the top 12 noncompliant items. The airline provided training during the Human Factors module in each pilots recurrent training on Pilot Intentional Non Compliance (PINC). The training including developing pilots’ understanding that while most Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP) reports grant pilots immunity from legal action, if a violation is labeled PINC, ASAP protections do not apply. Further line checks were conducted after the pilots received the PINC training. The top 12 noncompliant items from the pre-PINC training group were compared to the same 12 items in the post-PINC training group. Significant improvement in SOP compliance was found in six of the 12 items tested. The results established that training pilots on the risk of PINC did significantly increase SOP compliance
Richmondaropa conjuncta Shea & Colgan & Stanisic 2012, n. comb.
No full textRichmondaropa conjuncta (Iredale, 1941) n. comb. (Figs 30D, E; 32D, E; 34D, E; 36D, E; 38C, D) Roblinella conjuncta Iredale, 1941b: 1; Iredale 1941a: 268 (illustration only). Roblinella conjuncta: Smith 1992: 203. Gyrocochlea conjuncta (Iredale): Stanisic et al. 2010: 200. Type locality. Byron Bay, NSW. Diagnosis. Shell very small, cinnamon brown, planispiral with flat to slightly depressed spire. Protoconch sculpture primarily spiral consisting of 17 prominent, widely spaced, narrow, continuous spiral cords; underlying weak radial ridges present. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, orthocline to weakly prosocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 67–100 (mean 77). Umbilicus wide U-shaped to cup-shaped. Type material examined. Neotype (here designated) AM C.5311, Byron Bay, NSW (28° 39' S, 153° 37' E), 1908. Other material examined. Byron Bay: AM C.140243, AM C.472888. Brunswick Heads: QMMO 16789. Description. Shell very small, cinnamon-brown, planispiral with flat to slightly depressed spire. Whorls 3.50–4.25, tightly coiled, the last weakly expanding and strongly descending in front. Sutures strongly impressed. Shell diameter 3.46–4.04 mm (mean 3.74 mm), height 1.81–2.26 mm (mean 2.08 mm), H/D 0.50–0.59 (mean 0.55). Protoconch flat, of 1.12 whorls, diameter 0.56–0.67 mm. Protoconch sculpture primarily spiral consisting of 17 prominent, widely spaced, narrow, continuous spiral cords; underlying weak radial ridges present. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, orthocline to weakly prosocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 67–100 (mean 77), width of interstices on the first teleoconch whorl greater than or equal to width of six ribs; on the penultimate whorl greater than or equal to width of six ribs; each rib with one or more periostracal blades; with or without overlapping thickenings. Interstitial sculpture of low prominent microradial ribs and low, weaker microspiral cords forming weak beads at their intersection; number of microradials between ribs on the first teleoconch whorl 5–8; on first quarter of body whorl 13–17. Aperture broadly ovately-lunate. Parietal callus prominent, transparent. Umbilicus wide U-shaped to cup-shaped, diameter 0.80–1.16 mm (mean 0.99 mm), D/U 3.32–4.36 (mean 3.79). Based on 11 measured adults. Anatomy unknown. Distribution and habitat. Coastally in the Byron Bay region, north-eastern NSW; found in rainforest and vine thicket; living on underside of logs. Remarks. Iredale (1941) did not provide details about the protoconch of the type of Richmondaropa conjuncta n. comb. when he described the species. The type cannot now be located so that the protoconch sculpture cannot be determined. However, by assigning the species to Roblinella Iredale, 1937 (type: Helix roblini Petterd, 1879) Iredale identified this species as having a primarily spiral protoconch (see note below). Additionally, the comparatively low rib count for the body whorl (approx. 80) given by Iredale (1941b) is distinctive among the nautiliform charopids of north-eastern NSW. The illustration of the species, provided by that author in a publication (Iredale 1941a) preceding that in which the original description appeared (Iredale 1941b), clearly shows the wide rib spacing on the body whorl. Contemporary collections from the coastal rainforests around the Byron Bay area have discovered specimens which align quite closely with Iredale’s description. Hence, in order to stabilise this name a neotype is here designated from this recently collected material. R. conjuncta differs from R. prava by having more tightly coiled whorls and fewer, more widely spaced radial ribs on the teleoconch. This species may only be a regional variant of R. prava, however without DNA results and soft parts to study, full species status is retained pending further study. A second large undescribed planispiral charopid occurs sympatrically with R. conjuncta distinguished by more crowded teleoconch ribs, shallower whorls, wider umbilicus and a cancellate protoconch not dissimilar to ‘Gyrocochlea’ species. A specimen identified as R. conjuncta from the Byron Bay-Brunswick Heads road in the Queensland Museum collections had a higher teleoconch rib count (100), compared to other specimens from the Byron Bay area (up to 90). It is here included with R. conjuncta based on its proximity to the Byron Bay site but may in fact be R. prava. Note. Four species from Tasmania (H. agnewi Legrand, 1871, H. curacoae Brazier, 1871, H. mathinnae Petterd, 1879, H. gadenensis Petterd, 1879), one from South Australia (R. speranda Iredale, 1937) and Endodonta intermedia Odhner, 1917 from the Atherton Tableland, north-eastern Queensland, were originally placed in Roblinella by Iredale (1937) on the basis of spirally lirate protoconch sculpture. Subsequently, R. conjuncta Iredale, 1941 from Northern New South Wales was also assigned to this genus. Stanisic et al. (2010) reassigned R. intermedia to Sinployea Solem, 1983. Here we have assigned R. conjuncta to Richmondaropa n. gen. Detailed examination of the micro-architecture of the protoconchs of the remaining Tasmanian representatives indicates that Roblinella still remains a polyphyletic taxon requiring revision (J. Stanisic unpublished data).Published as part of Shea, M., Colgan, D. J. & Stanisic, J., 2012, 3585, pp. 1-109 in Zootaxa 3585 on pages 83-8
Accompanying Survivors of Sexual Harm: A Toolkit for Churches
No full textAccompanying Survivors of Sexual Harm is a trauma-informed resource that offers education and support of Christian clergy and lay leaders as they respond to sexual harm in their communities. It lays out plans for workshop-based sessions, which aim to educate clergy and lay leaders about
• Understanding the nature of sexual harm and its prevalence in New Zealand society
• Being alert to and responding in a pastorally sensitive manner to people within their community who have experienced/are experiencing sexual harm
• Identifying and articulating some of the scriptural and theological foundations that work to justify/legitimise/enable sexual harm while silencing the voices of victims/survivors
• Identifying and articulating some of the scriptural and theological foundations that work to challenge and resist sexual harm
• Exploring how their church might work to create a safe space for victims/survivors of sexual harm.
The toolkit will be of value to anyone in a church leadership position, including those training for Christian ministry and those who have extensive ministry/leadership experience. It is intentionally ecumenical in nature and does not require knowledge of any one denominational tradition.
While some of the content relates specifically to the context of Aotearoa New Zealand, most of the material can be adapted and used further afield. There is space offered throughout the sessions for participants to discuss how issues pertaining to sexual harm relate to their own communities. Participants also have opportunities to consider how their own cultures, contexts, traditions, and languages will help shape their role of accompanying victims and survivors.
The toolkit is free for anyone to download and use. If you have any queries about the use of the toolkit, please contact us at [email protected].
We hope this resource is a useful and meaningful tool for all those who accompany victims and survivors on their journey
Planorbacochlea manningensis Shea & Colgan & Stanisic 2012, n. sp.
No full textPlanorbacochlea manningensis n. sp. (Figs 20A; 21A; 22A; 23A; 24A; 25E; 26E; 28C–E) Etymology. For the Manning Valley, New South Wales. Diagnosis. Shell very small, orange-brown, biconcave with weekly depressed spire. Protoconch sculpture spiral consisting of 25 to 27 prominent, closely spaced, beaded spiral cords and weak, closely spaced radial ridges becoming more pronounced toward the protoconch-teleoconch boundary. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, orthocline to weakly prosocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 129–144. Umbilicus wide cup-shaped. Penis club- or pear-shaped, longitudinal pilasters distally, apically with a fluted vase-shaped verge having a terminal pore and about half the length of penis or longer. Type material examined. Holotype. AM C.369784, 15 km SW of Taree, via Tinonee, off Possum Brush Rd, New South Wales, (31° 59’ 23” S, 152° 22’ 23" E), 19.iii.1990, coll. I. Loch, P.H. Colman. Paratypes. AM C. 472893, same data as holotype. SW Taree: AM C.163134. NW Taree: AM C.163253. S Wingham: AM C.163268. Description. Shell very small, orange-brown, biconcave with weakly depressed spire. Whorls 3.5–4.0, tightly coiled, the last inflated and descending in front. Sutures strongly impressed. Shell diameter 3.05–3.37 mm (mean 3.25 mm), height 1.50–1.63 mm (mean 1.57 mm), H/D 0.47–0.51 (mean 0.48). Protoconch flat, of 1.12–1.25 whorls, diameter 0.40–0.54 mm. Protoconch sculpture strongly spiral consisting of 25 to 27 prominent, closely spaced, beaded spiral cords and weak, closely spaced radial ridges becoming more pronounced toward the protoconch-teleoconch boundary. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, orthocline to weakly prosocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 129–144 (mean 138), width of interstices on the first teleoconch whorl equal to width of four to less than six ribs; on the penultimate whorl equal to width of four to less than six ribs; each rib with two or more periostracal blades. Interstitial sculpture of low prominent microradial ribs and low, weaker microspiral cords forming weak beads at their intersection; number of microradials between ribs on the first teleoconch whorl 5–7; on first quarter of body whorl 6–7. Aperture broadly ovately-lunate. Parietal callus prominent, transparent. Umbilicus wide cup-shaped, diameter 0.85–1.03 mm (mean 0.95 mm), D/U 3.23–3.61 (mean 3.43). Based on 8 measured adults. Reproductive organs with ovotestis containing two clumps of alveoli, with more than two alveolar lobes per clump. Hermaphroditic duct narrow to broad crescent-shaped. Spermatheca with a large oval bulb. Penial retractor muscle inserting at the junction of the penis and epiphallus. Epiphallus equal or shorter than penis, entering penis through a verge. Penis club- or pear-shaped, longitudinal pilasters distally, apically with a fluted vase-shaped verge having a terminal pore and about half the length of penis or longer. Vagina shorter than penis. Atrium short. Distribution and habitat. Lower Manning Valley, NSW; found in wet sclerophyll forest, living under logs. Remarks. Planorbacochlea manningensis n. sp. superficially resembles P. planorbis from the Port Stephens/ Hunter River area in shell morphology but can be distinguished from that species by the more crowded ribbing on the teleoconch. P. yessabahensis n. sp. from the Macleay Valley has less crowded ribs on the teleoconch and a protoconch which is reticulate (lattice-like) with more widely spaced spiral cords. DNA extraction was unsuccessful for this species.Published as part of Shea, M., Colgan, D. J. & Stanisic, J., 2012, 3585, pp. 1-109 in Zootaxa 3585 on page 5
Comboynea winghamensis Shea & Colgan & Stanisic 2012, n. sp.
No full textComboynea winghamensis n. sp. (Figs 29D; 31D; 33D; 35D; 37D) Etymology. For the type locality, Wingham Brush Nature Reserve. Diagnosis. Shell very small, orange-brown, biconcave with depressed spire. Protoconch sculpture primarily spiral consisting of 17 to 22 prominent, crowded, low, broad spiral cords and very weak, irregularly spaced, underlying radial growth ridges. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, very crowded and quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, opisthocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 162–228 (mean 177). Umbilicus narrow U-shaped. Type material examined. Holotype. AM C.171399, Wingham Brush Nature Reserve, Wingham, Manning River, west of Taree, NSW (31° 52' 15" S, 152° 22' 51" E), 5. ii.1982, coll. M. Shea. Paratypes. AM C.472880, same data as holotype. Wingham Brush: QMMO31856, QMMO44829. Description. Shell very small, orange-brown, biconcave with depressed spire. Whorls 3.87–4.12, tightly coiled, the last inflated and descending in front. Sutures strongly impressed. Shell diameter 3.60–3.98 mm (mean 3.77 mm), height 1.94–2.20 mm (mean 2.06 mm), H/D 0.52–0.58 (mean 0.54). Protoconch flat, of 1.12 whorls, diameter 0.41–0.58 mm. Protoconch sculpture primarily spiral consisting of 17 to 22 prominent, crowded, low, broad spiral cords and very weak, irregularly spaced, underlying radial growth ridges. Teleoconch sculpture of numerous, prominent, very crowded and quite uniformly spaced, slightly sinuate, opisthocline radial ribs. Ribs on body whorl 162–228 (mean 177), width of interstices on the first teleoconch whorl equal to or greater than width of four ribs; on the penultimate whorl equal to width of four to greater than or equal to width of six ribs; each rib with two or more periostracal blades. Interstitial sculpture of low prominent microradial ribs and low, weaker microspiral cords forming weak beads at their intersection; number of microradials between ribs on the first teleoconch whorl 8–10; on first quarter of body whorl 5–6. Aperture narrowly ovately-lunate. Parietal callus prominent, transparent. Umbilicus narrow U-shaped, diameter 0.92–1.27 mm (mean 1.07 mm), D/U 2.95–4.05 (mean 3.54). Based on 10 measured adults. Anatomy unknown. Distribution and habitat: Wingham Brush Nature Reserve, Wingham, Manning River, west of Taree, NSW; found in subtropical rainforest, living on underside of logs and wood. Remarks. Comboynea winghamensis n. sp. superficially resembles Co. boorganna n. sp. found at higher altitudes but has a significantly higher rib count and slightly wider umbilicus. This species apparently is the sole planispiral/biconcave charopid taxon at the type locality at Wingham Brush, whereas Co. boorganna occurs sympatrically with at least two other planispiral charopids on the Comboyne Plateau. Anatomical and molecular data are unknown for this species. However the protoconch sculpture is unequivocally Comboynea.Published as part of Shea, M., Colgan, D. J. & Stanisic, J., 2012, 3585, pp. 1-109 in Zootaxa 3585 on pages 72-7
Hipposideros wollastoni subsp. fasensis Flannery & Colgan 1993
No full text<p> <b> <i>Hipposideros wollastoni fasensis</i> Flannery & Colgan, 1993</b> </p> <p> <i>Rec. Aust. Mus.</i> 45(1): 52, figs 6–10, table 4. (19 March 1993).</p> <p> <b>Common name</b>. Wollaston’s Leaf-nosed Bat.</p> <p> <b>Current name</b>. <i>Hipposideros wollastoni fasensis</i> Flannery & Colgan, 1993; following Simmons (2005).</p> <p> <b>Holotype</b>. M.21876 by original designation. Female young adult, [Field no. FJ58], skull, body in alc., tongue in alc., frozen tissue; collected by T. F. Flannery, 26 February 1990, registered 20 June 1990.</p> <p> <b>Condition</b>. Cranium with fracture in left parietal; both dentaries complete; soft palate retained on skull. Body in alc.: broken left forearm and humerus, hole in left wing membrane between forearm and 5th digit.</p> <p> <b>Type locality</b>. At an alt. of 400–450 m on the hill south of the airstrip at 2Fas village (3°13'S 141°30'E), West Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea.</p> <p> <b>Comments</b>. Described from the holotype only; we are not aware of any subsequent records of the taxon. Provisionally recognized as a full species by Helgen (2007) but retained as a subspecies here, pending formal elevation to species.</p>Published as part of <i>Parnaby, Harry E., Ingleby, Sandy & Divljan, Anja, 2017, Type Specimens of Non-fossil Mammals in the Australian Museum, Sydney, pp. 277-420 in Records of the Australian Museum 69 (5)</i> on page 392, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.69.2017.1653, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/5237800">http://zenodo.org/record/5237800</a>
- …
