126,233 research outputs found
Alburnoides holciki Coad & Bogutskaya 2012
No full text<i>Alburnoides holciki</i> Coad & Bogutskaya, 2012 [N]—Spirlin <p> <b>Taxonomy.</b> Original description: <i>Alburnoides holciki</i> Coad & Bogutskaya, 2012: 44, figs. 1–2 [Hari River at Herat, 34°20’N, 62°12’E, Afghanistan; holotype: SNMB 6788].— Afghanistan synonyms: <i>Alburnoides parhami</i> Mousavi-Sabet, Vatandoust & Doadrio, 2015.—Revisions: None.—Illustration: Coad & Bogutskaya (2012: figs. 1–2).</p> <p> <b>Status in Afghanistan.</b> First identified from Afghanistan by Coad & Bogutskaya (2012); confirmed by Coad (2015: 227).—Afghanistan materials: None.</p> <p> <b>Distribution and habitat.</b> Distribution in Afghanistan: Hari River.—General distribution: Central Asia: Hari [= Tedzhen / Hariroud] River, Afghanistan, its western tributary in Iran, southern Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and western Tajikistan.—Habitat: This species lives in all kinds of streams. Freshwater.</p> <p> <b>Economic importance.</b> No commercial importance.</p> <p> <b>Conservation.</b> Conservation status in Afghanistan: Unknown.—IUCN: NE (2023).—Threats: Unknown.— Moderate sensitivity to human activities.—Not considered as a keystone species.—Decline status: Unknown.— Low priority for conservation action.</p>Published as part of <i>Çiçek, Erdoğan, Fricke, Ronald, Eagderi, Soheil, Sungur, Sevil, Coad, Brian W & Hamdard, Mohammad Hamid, 2023, Fishes of Afghanistan; a revised and updated annotated checklist, pp. 1-69 in Zootaxa 5305 (1)</i> on page 34, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5305.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8048564">http://zenodo.org/record/8048564</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Prognostic nomogram of TCGA-COAD patients.
No full text(A) Nomogram for predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival of TCGA-COAD patients. (B) The calibration curve of 1- and 3-year overall survival of TCGA-COAD patients.</p
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
FABP4 expression correlated with infiltration immune cells in COAD patients.
No full text(A) The mRNA expression levels of FABP4 in TCGA-COAD samples and normal samples, *** p <0.001. (B) The protein level of FABP4 in COAD tissues and adjacent noncancerous colon tissues (magnified, X100 and X200). (C) Correlation analysis of FABP4 expression and immune infiltration cells based on TIMER database.</p
Acanthobrama hadiyahensis Coad, Alkahem & Behnke 1983
No full text<p> 4. <i>Acanthobrama hadiyahensis</i> Coad, Alkahem & Behnke, 1983 ―Arabian Bream― <b>Endemic</b></p> <p> <b>Taxonomy.</b> Original description: <i>Acanthobrama hadiyahensis</i> Coad, Alkahem & Behnke, 1983:1, fig. 1 [Wadi Hadiyah, near Hadiyah, Saudi Arabia, about 25°33’N, 38°44’E; Holotype: NMC 82-0110A]. Synonyms: None</p> <p> <b>Status in the Arabian Peninsula.</b> Recorded from the Arabian Peninsula in original description by Coad <i>et al.</i> (1983); by confirmed by Hamidan & Aloufi (2014), Hamidan & Shobrak (2019), and Freyhof <i>et al.</i> (2020).</p> <p> <b>General distribution.</b> Khaibar and northern Hijaz, Saudi Arabia. Habitat: Freshwater.</p> <p> <b>Distribution in the Arabian Peninsula:</b> Saudi Arabia, in springs of Wadi Hadiya in the Khaibar region, and the Qusaiba’a Dam (locally known as Sadd Al-Bint) in Al-Thamad area of Khaibar (Hamidan & Al-Aoufi 2014; Hamidan & Shobrak 2019; Freyhof <i>et al.</i> 2020).</p> <p> <b>Economic importance.</b> Locally consumed, but of no commercial importance.</p> <p> <b>Conservation.</b> Critically Endangered (CR).</p>Published as part of <i>Esmaeili, Hamid Reza & Hamidan, Neshat, 2023, Inland fishes of the Arabian Peninsula: Review and a revised checklist, pp. 201-226 in Zootaxa 5330 (2)</i> on pages 206-207, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5330.2.2, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/8249316">http://zenodo.org/record/8249316</a>
Functional enrichment analyses of FABP4 coexpressed genes in COAD.
No full text(A) GO and (B) KEGG analysis of the coexpressed genes in COAD. (C) FABP4 related coexpression genes was enriched in antigen processing and presentation pathway.</p
- …
