1,720,956 research outputs found
FIGURES 46–48. FIGURE 46 in The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species
No full textFIGURES 46–48. FIGURE 46. Zelus cervicalis: rounded, unarmed humeri, FIGURE 47. Zelus luridus: distinctly spinose humeri, FIGURE 48. Zelus renardii: angulate humeri.Published as part of Clem, C.Scott, Swanson, Daniel R. & Ray, Charles H., 2019, The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species, pp. 151-198 in Zootaxa 4688 (2) on page 172, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4688.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/351602
FIGURES 21–26. FIGURE 21 in The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species
No full textFIGURES 21–26. FIGURE 21. Rhiginia cruciata: lateral curved prongs on scutellum apex, FIGURE 22. Barce fraterna: clypeus with angular, spiniform process, FIGURE 23. Ploiaria sp: connate, non-hairy protarsi, FIGURE 24. Stenolemus lanipes: protibial venter with strongly sclerotized denticles in addition to setae, FIGURE 25. Empicoris sp.: lateral carinae of posterior lobe of pronotum, FIGURE 26. Empicoris sp.: widened pterostigmaPublished as part of Clem, C.Scott, Swanson, Daniel R. & Ray, Charles H., 2019, The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species, pp. 151-198 in Zootaxa 4688 (2) on page 159, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4688.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/351602
FIGURES 40–45. FIGURE 40. Apiomerus crassipes pronotal pattern, FIGURE 41. Apiomerus spissipes pronotal pattern, FIGURE 42 in The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species
No full textFIGURES 40–45. FIGURE 40. Apiomerus crassipes pronotal pattern, FIGURE 41. Apiomerus spissipes pronotal pattern, FIGURE 42. Sinea diadema: A) dorsoapical spine on profemur; B) spined anterior pronotal lobe; C) cylindrical profemur, FIGURE 43. Sinea spinipes: A) tuberculate anterior pronotal lobe; B) fusiform, thickened profemur, FIGURE 44. Doldina sp.: apicolateral spines of profemur, FIGURE 45. Fitchia aptera: darkened peritreme of abdominal spiraclesPublished as part of Clem, C.Scott, Swanson, Daniel R. & Ray, Charles H., 2019, The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species, pp. 151-198 in Zootaxa 4688 (2) on page 171, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4688.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/351602
FIGURES 36–39. FIGURE 36 in The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species
No full textFIGURES 36–39. FIGURE 36. Pnirontis sp.: A) blunt spine at end of scape; B) ventrally armed scape; C) mandibular plates slightly surpassing antennifer, FIGURE 37. Ctenotrachelus minor: elongate prosternum, FIGURE 38. Oncocephalus geniculatus: incrassate profemur, FIGURE 39. Diaditus tejanus: mandibular plates between antennaePublished as part of Clem, C.Scott, Swanson, Daniel R. & Ray, Charles H., 2019, The Reduviidae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera) of Alabama, with a morphological key to species, pp. 151-198 in Zootaxa 4688 (2) on page 162, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4688.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/351602
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
