1,720,993 research outputs found
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_3_Supplement - Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_3_Supplement for Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning by David Mitchell, Sarah E. Larson, Claudia Colantonio, and Christina Nguyen in State and Local Government Review</p
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_2_Supplement - Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_2_Supplement for Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning by David Mitchell, Sarah E. Larson, Claudia Colantonio, and Christina Nguyen in State and Local Government Review</p
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_5_Supplement - Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_5_Supplement for Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning by David Mitchell, Sarah E. Larson, Claudia Colantonio, and Christina Nguyen in State and Local Government Review</p
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_4_Supplement - Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_4_Supplement for Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning by David Mitchell, Sarah E. Larson, Claudia Colantonio, and Christina Nguyen in State and Local Government Review</p
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_6_Supplement - Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_6_Supplement for Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning by David Mitchell, Sarah E. Larson, Claudia Colantonio, and Christina Nguyen in State and Local Government Review</p
SLGR_17-0019R2_Table_7_Supplement - Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning
SLGR_17-0019R2_Table_7_Supplement for Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning by David Mitchell, Sarah E. Larson, Claudia Colantonio, and Christina Nguyen in State and Local Government Review</p
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_7_Supplement - Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_7_Supplement for Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning by David Mitchell, Sarah E. Larson, Claudia Colantonio, and Christina Nguyen in State and Local Government Review</p
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_1_Supplement - Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning
Supplemental Material, SLGR_17-0019R2,_Table_1_Supplement for Planning for Change: Incorporating Contextual Implementation Design into Strategic Planning by David Mitchell, Sarah E. Larson, Claudia Colantonio, and Christina Nguyen in State and Local Government Review</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
