1,720,997 research outputs found
.: Impaired endothelium-independent vasodilation at peripheral microcirculatory level in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy
No full textRidotta risposta vasodilatatrice del microcircolo periferico al Nitroprussiato di Sodio in pazienti con ipertensione arteriosa essenziale ed ipertrofia ventricolare sinistra
No full textRelazione tra ipertrofia ventricolare sinistra e vasodilatazione microcircolatoria cutanea al Sodio Nitroprussiato in pazienti con ipertensione arteriosa essenziale
No full textRidotta risposta vasodilatatrice del microcircolo periferico al Sodio Nitroprussiato in pazienti con ipertensione arteriosa essenziale ed ipertrofia ventricolare sinistra
No full textDiminuita vasodilatazione endotelio-indipendente a livello del microcircolo cutaneo in pazienti ipertesi con ipertrofia ventricolare sinistra o rimodellamento concentrico
No full textImpaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation at peripheral microcirculatory level in patients with coronary artery disease
No full textnot availabl
Endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation is impaired at peripheral microcirculatory level in patients with coronary artery disease
No full textRicerca anticorpi anti strutture epidermiche in pazienti in trattamento con Ace inibitori
No full textGoing Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
