170,775 research outputs found
Example stimuli for "Bimodal distribution of performance in discriminating major/minor modes"
No full textAuditory stimuli (fifty sound files in WAV format) used in the experiments reported in C Chubb, CA Dickson, T Dean, C Fagan, DS Mann, CE Wright, M Guan, AE Silva, PK Gregersen and E Kowalsky (2013), "Bimodal distribution of performance in discriminating major/minor modes," Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (in print). Included also one PowerPoint file for demonstration of all fifty sounds.Created and preserved digitally in .WAV format
Parks College Flight Instructor Carl "Chubb" Wheeler
No full textParks College Flight Instructor Carl "Chubb" Wheeler (c. 1940
Recommended from our members
Ashkenazi et al. reply
No full textAshkenazi et al. reply to Original Article: J. Ashkenazi, W. E. Pickett, H. Krakauer, C. S. Wang, B. M. Klein, and S. R. Chubb, Ground state of trans-polyacetylene and the Peierls mechanism, Physical Review Letters 62, 2016 (1989).</p
Recommended from our members
Ground State of trans-Polyacetylene and the Peierls Mechanism - Errata
No full textErrata to Original Article: J. Ashkenazi, W. E. Pickett, H. Krakauer, C. S. Wang, B. M. Klein, and S. R. Chubb, Ground state of trans-polyacetylene and the Peierls mechanism, Physical Review Letters, 62, 2016 (1989).</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
FIG. 3 in Di€erentiation of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis Turnbull, 1956 and G. rasini Lucky, 1973 (Monogenea) with reassignment of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis Turnbull, 1956 sensu Harris (1986) to G. rasini
No full textFIG. 3. Schematic representations of the large cirrus spines of: (A) G. rasini from Xiphophoru s hybrids; and (B) that of G. bullatarudis from P. reticulata. The three-dimensional curvature of these structures is not shown. The main di€erence between the two species is that each side of the base of the large cirrus spine of G. bullatarudis appears to join to form a ring whereas those of the large spine of G. rasini diverge and do not appear to join.Published as part of Richards, G. R., Veltkamp, C. J. & Chubb, J. C., 2000, Di€erentiation of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis Turnbull, 1956 and G. rasini Lucky, 1973 (Monogenea) with reassignment of Gyrodactylus bullatarudis Turnbull, 1956 sensu Harris (1986) to G. rasini, pp. 341-353 in Journal of Natural History 34 (3) on page 347, DOI: 10.1080/002229300299525, http://zenodo.org/record/527951
- …
