1,720,987 research outputs found
Erratum à l’article de Christophe Pottier et Annie Bolle « Le Prasat Trapeang Phong à Hariharâlaya : histoire d’un temple et archéologie d’un site »
Erratum à l’article de Christophe Pottier et Annie Bolle « Le Prasat Trapeang Phong à Hariharâlaya : histoire d’un temple et archéologie d’un site ». In: Aséanie 25, 2010. pp. 135-136
À la recherche de Goloupura
Christophe Pottier
In search of Goloupura
In this paper, the writer reconsiders an old hypothesis proposed in the 1930s by Victor Goloubew about the configuration of the first Angkorean capital built in the last years of the ninth century by king Yašovarman around his main temple on top of the Phnom Bakheng. Rarely and too briefly contested in the 1970s, this hypothesis -humorously named Goloupura- is still present and influences urban studies at Angkor, lending support to the idea of a square and geometric walled city, a shape supposed to be continuously applied for centuries, until Angkor Thorn.
The writer re-evaluates the findings of Goloubew's archaeological research and, using ground checkings, remote sensing, spatial analysis, epigraphic evidence and limited cores, he demonstrates that it is impossible to accept Goloubew's hypothesis. A fresh interpretation and a new dating are then proposed for the most important remains of Goloupura: what was previously considered to be the south-west part of the large moat surrounding the city appears to have been an ingenious waterway allowing a better link between the late twelfth-century capital with the lake Tonle Sap and the fluvial network. Finally, the writer concludes with a general view of the extension of Yašovarman's capital.Christophe Pottier
A la recherche de Goloupura
Cet article examine un aspect de l'hypothèse émise dans les années 1930 par Victor Goloubew à propos de la première capitale angkorienne, fondée à la fin du IXe siècle par Yašovarman autour du Phnom Bakheng. Alors que l'identification du temple établi au sommet de ce phnom avec le « temple-montagne » de ce roi est désormais considérée comme une certitude, la restitution des limites de la cité - surnommée Goloupura - est nettement moins assurée même si elle a largement contribué - et contribue toujours - à propager l'image de la cité angkorienne entourée d'une enceinte carrée, assez semblable en fait à Angkor Thorn. Ce schéma idéal n'a été contesté que tardivement et brièvement par B. P. Groslier en 1979, mais reste encore fréquemment accepté, parfois légèrement modifié, et demeure ainsi très présent dans le paysage des études angkoriennes. L'article propose tout d'abord une réévaluation des arguments à l'origine de l'hypothèse de V. Goloubew. Puis les vestiges existants sont réétudiés suivant des approches complémentaires (analyse spatiale, télédétection, reconnaissances de terrain, examen de données épigraphiques et stratigraphiques) qui s'accordent à nier l'existence de Goloupura. Cette hypothèse devant être abandonnée, une autre interprétation et une nouvelle datation des vestiges monumentaux principaux sont alors proposées. Finalement, ces éléments permettent de brosser un tableau général de l'extension de la capitale de Yašovarman.Pottier Christophe. À la recherche de Goloupura. In: Bulletin de l'Ecole française d'Extrême-Orient. Tome 87 N°1, 2000. pp. 79-107
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
