1,720,962 research outputs found
SU-E-T-502: Dose Perturbation Effects Near Implant Surfaces Caused by Secondary Electron Transport in Photon-Beam Therapy
No full textSU-E-T-54: Dosimetric Verification of Monte Carlo Dose Calculations for a GammaMed HDR 192Ir Brachytherapy Source Using Various Detector Types, and Non-Reference Condition Correction Factors KNR
No full textPO-0970: On the water equivalence of thirteen commercially available phantom materials in 192Ir brachytherapy
No full textPO-0969: Development of dose measurements close to brachytherapy sources in the German standard DIN 6803
No full textSU‐E‐T‐126: Non‐Reference Condition Correction Factor KNR of Typical Radiation Detectors for the Dosimetry of High‐Energy Photons
No full textSU‐F‐T‐06: Development of a Formalism for Practical Dose Measurements in Brachytherapy in the German Standard DIN 6803
No full textSU‐E‐T‐46: Application of a Twin‐Detector Method for the Determination of the Mean Photon Energy Em at Points of Measurement in a Water Phantom Surrounding a GammaMed HDR 192Ir Brachytherapy Source
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
