1,720,952 research outputs found
Targeted M&A Performance: Post-Acquisition Process and Organizational Integration
Corporations use mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as a tactic in implementing strategy,
yet the rate of outcomes that meet targeted performance remains relatively low. Given the
importance and frequency of M&A utilization in management strategy, it is critical that the
success rate in achieving targeted perfomaance improve so that M&A are viable strategic options
for industry. Although pre-acquisition factors and processes such as financial due diligence and
strategic fit may improve the chance of success, significant evidence of correlation between these
elements and targeted performance outcomes does not exist. Further, companies will continue to
combine in’espective ofpre-acquisition coMitions and thus need assistance fi’om research in
post-acquisition moderators of success.
Much of the research of post-acquisition M&A has developed along disciplinary lines
where the process of functional integration is studied separately from integration of people in the
merged organization. This study examines the contribution of both the functional integration and
human capital integration to the targeted post-acquisition performance outcome. A systematic
review of research explores post-acquisition integration literature to identify moderators of
achievement of targeted performance.
The evidence collected supports the theory that successful post-acquisition integration of
combined processes and organizational elements correlates to successful achievement of targeted
acquisition perforrnance. Further, the research supports the theory that, although pre-acquisition
factors influence integration, the post-acquisition process moderates achievement of the targeted
performance outcome. The analysis also provides evidence regarding the importance of
leadership, management of employee-level dynamics, as well as completion of organizational and process integration prior to realization of synergies and targeted post-acquisition
performance. Thus, where many companies identify the end of the post-acquisition process as
the point at which functions combine as targeted, research suggests that closure also needs to
occur on the organizational integration side to optimize possible synergies and acquisition
performance.Targeted M&A Performance: Post-Acquisition Process and Organizational Integration
Sheila Dempsey Chickene
A Thesis
Submitted to the
Graduate Faculty
of
University of Mm’yland University College
in Partial Fulfillment of
The Requirements for the Degree
of
Doctor of Management
Advisory Committee:
Dr. Thomas Mierzwa
Dr. Denise Breckon
March 2013
UMI Number: XXXXXXX
Copyright 2013 by
Chickene, Sheila Dempsey
INFORMATION TO USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy
submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations
and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper
alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized
copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
UMI®
UMI Microform XXXXXX
Copyright 2013 by ProQuest, LLC
All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
ProQuest, LLC
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, M148106-1346
University of Maryland University College
Graduate School of Management & Technology
DOCTOR OF MANAGEMENT DEGREE
DISSERTATION APPROVAL FORM
Candidate Sheila Dempsey Chickene has completed all the necessary dissertation
requirements of University of Maryland University College’s Doctor of Management
Program.
APPROVED:
Committee Chah’:
Dr. Thomas J. Mierzwa March 2, 2013
Date:
Committee Co-Chair:
Dr. Denise A. Breckon March 2, 2013
Date:
iii
Abstract
Corporations use mergers and acquisitions (M&A) as a tactic in implementing strategy,
yet the rate of outcomes that meet targeted performance remains relatively low. Given the
importance and frequency of M&A utilization in management strategy, it is critical that the
success rate in achieving targeted perfomaance improve so that M&A are viable strategic options
for industry. Although pre-acquisition factors and processes such as financial due diligence and
strategic fit may improve the chance of success, significant evidence of correlation between these
elements and targeted performance outcomes does not exist. Further, companies will continue to
combine in’espective ofpre-acquisition coMitions and thus need assistance fi’om research in
post-acquisition moderators of success.
Much of the research of post-acquisition M&A has developed along disciplinary lines
where the process of functional integration is studied separately from integration of people in the
merged organization. This study examines the contribution of both the functional integration and
human capital integration to the targeted post-acquisition performance outcome. A systematic
review of research explores post-acquisition integration literature to identify moderators of
achievement of targeted performance.
The evidence collected supports the theory that successful post-acquisition integration of
combined processes and organizational elements correlates to successful achievement of targeted
acquisition perforrnance. Further, the research supports the theory that, although pre-acquisition
factors influence integration, the post-acquisition process moderates achievement of the targeted
performance outcome. The analysis also provides evidence regarding the importance of
leadership, management of employee-level dynamics, as well as completion of organizational
iv
and process integration prior to realization of synergies and targeted post-acquisition
performance. Thus, where many companies identify the end of the post-acquisition process as
the point at which functions combine as targeted, research suggests that closure also needs to
occur on the organizational integration side to optimize possible synergies and acquisition
performance.
Dedication
V
This dissertation is dedicated to family members who were instrumental in the
completion of this body of work. First to my hnsband Paul, son Michael, and daughter Alexa,
thank you for pushing me to get the work done when it would have been nmre fun to do other
things. Thank you as well as for your unwavering belief in nay ability to complete the work
needed for my doctorate and this dissertation. I look forward to our increased time together!
To my Mom and Dad, Marie and Joe Dempsey, thank you for raising your 14 children to
believe anything is possible and for cheering us on even when you may not have agreed with our
choices. To my sister Karen Dempsey, who instigated this adventure, I look forward to
celebrating your eventual Ph.D. completion. To Marianne and Joe Chickene, my second parents,
thank you for your support and enconragement tlu’oughout. Lastly, to Lisa K Hill, my fi’iend
since kindergarten thanks for jumping in as my surrogate at Michael’s graduation - it was
inevitable that the two graduations would coincide.
vi
Ackno~vledgement
I look fondly back on the learning gained through my doctoral experience and have many
to acknowledge for their hand in the successful completion of both my coursework and this
dissertation. First, thank you to Dr. Thomas Mierzwa and Dr. Denise Breckon for acting as
advisor, coach, and editor throughout nay dissertation journey. Yore" guidance was a precious
gift.
In addition to my advisors, i ~vould also like to aclmowledge those in my cohol~t that
journeyed along with me including Rajesh Radakrishnan, Amanda Lle~vellyn, Tammy
Borkowski, Steve Gantz, Dainty Ebb, and Shaun Vaughns. There was definitely strength in
numbers. I feel blessed to have been part of such a talented group of scholars. May your new
knowledge serve you well!
vii
© Copyright by
Sheila Dempsey Chickene
2013
Table of Contents
viii
Table of Contents ...............................................................................v..i.ii
List of Tables ..............................................................................................x. i
List of Figures ............................................................................................x..i
Chapter 1 : Introduction ..........................................................................1.
Background ....................................................................................... 1
Problem Statement ...........................................................................5
Research Questions .......................................................................7
Scope of Study ..................................................................................8
Significance of This Research ...........................................................10
Dissertation Chapters ............................................................................11
Chapter 2: Literature Review ................................................................1..2
Overview .........................................................................................1.2 .
Pre-Acquisition Influences that Create Unique Acquisition Starting Points ....... 12
Perspectives in Post-Acquisition Integration ............................................... 16
Leadership and Communication in Process and Organizational Integration ........ 18
The Influence of Employee-Level Dynamics on Integration ..............................23
Development of a Combined Organizational Culture ....................................... 26
Management of Transition Process and Activities ...................................2..8
The Influence of Processes mad Organization in Post-Acquisition integration.. 32
Chapter 3: Conceptual Framework ........................................................3.5
Introduction ..............................................................................3..5
Conceptual Model Description ..............................................................36
Variables of the Analysis ................................................................ 38
Hypotheses ......................................................................................3.9
Summary of the Research Model ..................................................................44
ix
Chapter 4: Research Method ..................................................................47
Introduction ..............................................................................4.7
Research Objectives ......................................................................4.7
Research Methodology ..................................................................47
Search Strategy ..........................................................................4.9
Data Collection Methods ............................................................... 52
Research Constraints and Limitations ...................:. ............................ 54
Threats to Validity ........................................................................ 55
Subject Matter Expert (SME) Review .................................................57
Chapter 5: Analysis of Findings ............................................................ 58
Introduction ...............................................................................5.8
Systematic Literature Search Results ................................................. 58
Characteristics of Excluded Studies ................................................... 59
Characteristics of Included Studies .................................................... 62
Synthesis of Included Studies .......................................................... 63
Pre-Acquisition Factors & a Well-Executed Post-Acquisition ................... 67
Externally Focused Pre-Acquisition Factors ............................... 68
Internally Focused Pre-Acquisltion Factors ................................ 71
Externally & Internally Focused Pre-Acquisition Factors ............... 74
Leadership and Communication ...................................................... 77
Employees and Organizational Cultm’e ..............................................81
Orgaaaizational and Process integration .............................................. 84
X
Limitations ................................................................................88
Problem Definition ........................................................... 89
Literature Search .............................................................. 89
Gathering Infol~nation fi’om Included Studies ........................... 90
Methods within Individual Studies. ........................................ 91
Integration of Evidence from Individual Studies ........................... 91
Intel~retation of Evidence ................................................... 92
Presentation of Results ........................................................ 92
Conclusion ...................................................................................... 93
Chapter 6: Implications for Management ..................................................... 100
Introduction ..............................................................................100
Implications for Management Theory ................................................. 100
Implications for Management Practice ................................................ 101
Future Trends in M&A .................................................................1.03
Recommendations for Future Research ............................................... 105
References ....................................................................................................109
Appendices ...................................................................................................124
Appendix A: Matrix of Merger and Acquisition Types ........................... 124
Appendix B: Selection Criteria ....................................................... 125
Appendix C: Assesslnent Criteria Tool (ACT) ......................................126
Appendix D: Search Strings ............................................................127
Appendix E: Results of Systematic Literature Search ............................. 128
Appendix F: Sources of Literature ................................................... 129
Appendix G: SME Response Folan ................................................... 130
List of Tables
xi
Table 1 :
Table 2:
Table 3:
Table 4:
Table 5:
Table 6:
Table 7:
Table 8:
Table 9:
Table 10:
Table 11:
Table 12:
Summary of Propositions Derived from Literature Review ................
Summary of Propositions, Variables, and Hypotheses ........................
Summary of Sem’ch Themes .......................................................
Search String Strategy Summary ....................................................
Excluded Studies .....................................................................
Included Study Summaries .........................................................
Externally Focused Pre-Acquisition Factor Studies and Findings .....
Internally Focused Pre-Acquisition Factor Studies and Findings ......
Externally & Internally Focused Pre-Acquisition Factor Studies and
Findings .......................................................................
Leadership and Communication Studies & Findings ..........................
Employee-Level Dynamics & Organizational Culture Studies and
Findings .........................................................................
Organizational & Process Integration Studies and Findings .................
34
45
51
52
61
64
71
73
76
81
84
88
Figure 1 :
Fignre 2:
Figure 3:
List of Figures
Conceptual Model of Post-Acquisition integration for Targeted M&A
Performance ..........................................................................................
Research Model and Hypotheses ....................................................
Evidence Based Model and Hypotheses ..................................
37
46
94
POST-M&A INTEGRATION AND PERFORMANCE 1
Background
Chapter 1: Introduction and Research Problem
Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are primary tactics in the arena of corporate strategy for
growth and sustainability. Thomson Financial figures show that an estimated 10,000 US
mergers and acquisitions occun’ed in 2006 (Marks & Vansteenkiste, 2008). Cartwright and
Schoenberg (2006) put the global rate at about 30,000 acquisitions in 2004. In spite of its use as
a tactic in corporate growth, estimates of success rates continue to be no higher than about 25-
34% (Deutsch & West, 2010). Some of the highest success rates are estimated at 50%
(Cartwright & Schoenberg, 2006). Further, Marks and Mirvis (1992) claim 33% of M&A result
in resale within five years of acquisition. As such, Haspeslagh and Jemison (1987), refer to
M&A as a risky vehicle for strategic renewal while Pablo and Javidan (2002) categorize the
M&A record of accomplishment as mediocre. Moreover, research indicates that despite decades
of study of factors such as acquisition relatedness, prior acquisition experience, and
organizational complementarity, antecedents for achievement of targeted financial outcomes
remain tmknown (Hitt, Harrison, Ireland, & Best, 1998; King, Dalton, Daily, & Covin, 2004).
Hitt et al. (1998) state, "the fact that acquisitive growth is a significant firm strategy and
many acquisitions are not successful suggests an inadequate theoretical and practical
understanding of this complex phenomenon" (p. 92). Many disciplines are attempting to
understand how acquisition integration processes can improve the probability of success
(Cartwright & Schoenberg, 2006). Research identifies four primary schools of thought that
attempt to explain these phenomena including financial, strategic management, process, and
organizational perspectives (Birkinshaw, Bresman, & HSkanson, 2000; Cartwright &
POST-M&A INTEGRATION AND PERFORMANCE 2
Schoenberg, 2006; Chatteljee, Lubatldn, Schweiger, & Weber, 1992; Creasy, Stull, & Peck,
2009; Harrison, Hitt, Hoskisson, & Ireland, 199t; and Homburg & Bucerius, 2006). Haspeslagh
and Jemison (1987) identify two phases of the M&A process - the activities that occur before the
signing of the agreement and the integration phase that occurs thereafter. The financial and
strategic management schools of thought tend to research the former whereas the majority of the
process and organizational studies align with the latter (Birkinshaw et al., 2000).
The focus of the financial perspective is primarily on wealth creation that results fi’om
efficiencies or synergies in acquisitions (Birkinsha~v et al., 2000; Cartwright & Schoenberg,
2006; and Harrison et al., 1991). The strategic management perspective focuses on the
compatibility or strategic fit of the merging organizations prior to acquisition (Birkinsha~v et al.,
2000; Cartwright & Schoenberg, 2006). Through the 1980’s, the majority of research in M&A
focused on the financial and strategic fit of the acquiring and acquired firms (Barkema &
Schijven, 2008; Nahavandi & Malekzadeh, 1988).
Despite the volume of research in the pre-acquisition arena, Harvey and Lusch (1995)
describe the lack of a comprehensive due diligence model as "disquieting" (p. 5) and call for
expanded resem’ch in this area. A decade later King et al. (2004) provide meta-analytic evidence
of a lack of economic or strategic antecedents of acquisition financial performance. The authors
determined that financial and strategic management factors were not capable of explaining the
success or failure and recommended searching for additional antecedents of success. Although
research continues in the pre-acquisition phase, Barkema and Schijven (2008) note a recent shift
in research to the post-acquisition process with potential to enhance or even predict the
realization of intended acquisition synergies. Given that poor fiscal and strategic due diligence is
not a sufficient explanation for all failures; research needs to look beyond the pre-acquisition
phase of M&A and investigate the post-acquisition phase.
POST-M&A INTEGRATION AND PERFORMANCE 3
In the process and organizational perspectives, the focus is primarily on post-acquisition
management, with evidence that the due diligence phase also benefits from understanding both
process and organizational integration during post-acquisition. The process perspective
investigates the role that an integration strategy and subsequent actions have on the outcome
while an organizational perspective focuses on employee and cultural dynamics of the
integration process (Cartwright and Schoenberg, 2006). Jemison and Sitkin (1986) define the
process perspective as "the acquisition process itselt" (p. 145) and focus on activities that occur
tbxoughout the acquisition. Birldnshaw et al. (2000) define the process perspective as task
integration in the post-acquisition phase of M&A.
If due diligence in the areas of financial and strategic compatibility are insufficient
predictors of success, then study of post-acquisition and these latter areas of process and
organizational integration may provide sought after answers. Cartwright and Schoenberg (2006)
comment that research and insight have tended to develop along disciplinary lines rather than in
a holistic or multi-disciplinary approach. Cartwright and Cooper (1995) recommend a multi-disciplinary
approach to allow for a "collective rather than fragmented contribution to our
understanding of the phenomena" (p. 41). In their study of successful and unsuccessful
acquisitions, Hittet al. (1998) concur with Cartwright and Cooper in concluding that no one
single theory fully explained the success or failure of acquisitions. Whereas fi
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Author Under Sail The Imagination of Jack London, 1893-1902
In Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Spirit Truth -- 2. From Absorption to Theatricality and Back Again -- 3. "I Will Build a New Present" -- 4. Sons as Authors -- 5. Fathers as Publishers -- 6. The Daughter as Author -- 7. Lovers as Authors -- 8. At Sea with the Family -- 9. Yellow News, Yellow Stories -- 10. The Return Home -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About Jay WilliamsIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
- …
