1,720,963 research outputs found

    Factors predictive of shockwave lithotripsy failure for ureteral stones: Why we need to hurry

    No full text
    Background: The Aims of This Study Are to Evaluate The Prognostic Factors of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy In Patients With Ureteric Stones, and to Identify Which Patients Might Directly Benefit of An Endoscopic Treatment. Methods: We Performed a Prospective Study From January 2013 and July 2016 On Patients With Single Ureteric Stone and Undergoing Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (Swl). We Divided Patients Into Two Groups: First Group (Success Group) Included Cases Resolved With Swl Only, and a Second Group (Failure Group) Including Patients With Stone Not Resolved By Swl and Requiring An Endoscopic Treatment. We Evaluated Age, Weight, Height, Body Mass Index, Stone Size, Hydronephrosis, Laterality, Location, Days Elapsed From Onset of Symptoms to Swl and Stone Density When Computed Tomography Was Performed. In Case of Stone Fragments >4 Mm, The Procedure Was Repeated Up to a Maximum of Three Times. Swl Was Considered As Failed If Patients Had a Residual Stone of Any Size After a Follow-Up of 3 Months or If a Complication Occurred. Results: 274 Patients Completed Follow-Up and Were Enrolled In The Study. Mean Age Was 53.22 Years (Standard Deviation: 13.98). Swl Overall Success Rate Was 84.3% (231 Patients Successfully Treated With Shockwaves) and Failure Rate Was 15.7% (43 Patients Underwent Auxiliary Endoscopic Procedure). At The Univariate Analysis, We Observed a Statistically Significant Difference for Hydronephrosis (P=0.006), Time Elapsed From Symptoms Onset (P=0.013), Patients’ Age (P=0.06) and Mean Stone Density (0.023). In The Multivariate Logistic Regression, Patients’ Age (or: 1.517), and Time Elapsed From Obstruction to Swl (or: 3.005) Were Independent Predictive Factors for Swl Failure. Furthermore, Moderate and Severe Hydronephrosis Seemed to Be Independent Predictive Factors for Swl Failure, Presenting An or of 2.451 and 4.207 Respectively. High Stone Density Resulted to Be a Predictive Factor for Swl Failure (or: 2.293 If Density Was Higher Than 1100 Hounsfield Units). Conclusions: We Report a Large Series of Patients Undergone Primary Swl for Ureteric Stones. Our Data Demonstrated The Role of Hydronephrosis, Time Elapsed From Obstruction Onset to Treatment and Stone Density As Independent Predictive Factors of Swl Failure

    BIOMARKERS OF UROTHELIAL DAMAGE IN PATIENTS TREATED BY ADJUVANT INTRAVESICAL THERAPY

    No full text
    Introduction/Aim: Chemotherapy or BCG given intravesically to prevent recurrence after transurethral resection (TUR) of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMI-BC) cause frequent, sometime severe, local toxicity. As a consequence, many patients do not complete the planned treatment (1). A major challenge for the urologists is to identify an early biomarker of urothelial damage to recognize and prevent local toxicity improving patient’s compliance. The purpose of our research was to investigate the relation between urothelial injury by intravesical treatment and the expression of potential biomarkers in urine and/or in barbotage solution. The urinary HB-EGF expression in interstitial cystitis has been analyzed by a few studies (2, 3). As a preliminary step, the variations of Fibronectin (FN), Epidermal Growth Factor- Receptor (EGF-R) and Heparin-binding Epidermal Growth Factor-like Growth Factor (HB-EGF) during intravesical therapy and after the administration of a solution with the potential role of urothelial repairing (hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate) were investigated. Patients and Methods: the toxicity of intravesical therapy with mitomycin, epirubicin or BCG was classified in 3 grades (absent, moderate, severe). Urine and bladder washing solution during intravesical therapy in 55 patients after NMI-BC TUR and in 10 healthy controls for a total of 200 samples were collected. Total cellular RNA was isolated from the cell pellet using miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen®). FN and EGF-R gene expression by Real Time quantitative PCR were analyzed. The expression of HB-EGF was measured in urine samples by ELISA (Abcam®). Results: In barbotage samples the FN gene expression and the EGF-R levels in our patients were respectively increased a median of 4.7 fold and decreased of 0.9 fold compared to controls. Before intravesical therapy and in absence of local toxicity, gene expression increased 1.9 fold for FN and 1.1 fold for EGF-R. In contrast, in patients with local toxicity due to intravesical therapy, the FN gene expression levels increased to a median of 5.82 fold, while EGF-R remained unchanged. The administration of hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate solution decreased the mean FN gene expression from 3 to 0.6 fold, with concomitant symptomatic relief. HB-EGF protein median urine levels were 25.7 pg/ml in 13 patients before intravesical therapy and 18.9 pg/ml in 5 healthy controls. No significant variations in relation to the local toxicity. During therapy median HB-EGF protein levels in urine varied from 21.6 pg/ml in absence of toxicity to 25.7 pg/ml in case of severe toxicity to 18.5 pg/ml after hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate solution. Preliminarily, the observed variations of HB-EGF, increasing no more than 1.2 fold compared to healthy controls, do not seem possible marker of urothelial damage. Discussion and Conclusion: EGF-R gene and HBEGF expressions do not seem to vary significantly in relation to local toxicity due to intravesical therapy. FN gene is overexpressed in presence of urothelial damage significantly reduced by intravesical hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate solution administration, according with symptoms relief

    S9-Fibronectin, EGF-R, HB-EGF:biomarkers of urothelial damage during intravesical adjuvant therapy?

    No full text
    Intravesical chemotherapy and immunotherapy with BCG represent the standard therapy to prevent recurrence after transurethral resection (TUR) of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMI-BC). Maintenance for at least one year is considered the best regimen. Noteworthy, a relevant number of patients do not complete the planned treatment due to local toxicity of the drug given intravesically1, 2. A major challenge for the urologists is to identify an early urothelial damage biomarker to prevent severe local toxicity requiring treatment interruption and to improve patient's compliance. The preliminary purpose of our research was to verify the possible correlation between urothelial damage induced by intravesical treatment and the expression of potential biomarkers in urine or bladder washing solution. Fibronectin (FN), Epidermal Growth Factor-Receptor (EGF-R) and Heparin-binding Epidermal Growth Factor-like Growth Factor (HB-EGF) have been preliminary investigated. The urinary HB-EGF expression in patients with interstitial cystitis has been already analyzed by some studies3, 4, 5 The biomarkers trend during therapy with hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate solution will be investigated. Materials and Methods: we collected 50 ml urine and bladder washing solution during intravesical therapy in 55 patients after NMI-BC TUR and in 10 healty controls for a total of 200 samples. After centrifugation, total cellular RNA was isolated from the cell pellett using miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen®) according to the manufacturer's instructions. We investigated FN and EGF-R gene expression by Real Time quantitative PCR. Finally, the abundance of HB-EGF in urine samples was measured using Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Abcam®) following manufacturer's instructions. Results: The FN gene expression levels in NMI-BC compared with controls were increased 4.7 fold while EGF-R levels were decreased 0.9 fold. In the patients in whom local toxicity due to intravesical therapy was clinically relevant, the FN gene expression levels were increased 5.82 fold, and the EGF-R one was decreased 0.88 fold. In contrast patients before starting therapy or with a good tolerance showed gene expression levels increased 1.9 fold for FN and 1.1 fold for EGF-R. In patients receiving hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate solution to treat the severe vesical toxicity the average FN gene expression levels were decreased from 3 to 0.6 fold, with concomitant symptomatic improvement. HB-EGF protein levels in urine in patients receiving intravesical chemo or immunotherapy were increased 1.2 fold compared to controls and remained unchanged during therapy. No fold change was detected in patients treated with hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate solution. Our preliminary data will be updated in the final presentation. Statistical analysis is ongoing. Conclusion: EGF-R gene expression in the bladder washing solution and HB-EGF levels in urine did not show significant fold change in relation to urothelial damage compared to controls. Preliminarly, FN gene expression in bladder washing solution showed an overexpression during urothelial damage and decrease after therapy with hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulphate solution in correlation to symptoms relief

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore