1,721,471 research outputs found
A4 see-saw models and form dominance
We introduce the idea of Form Dominance in the (type I) see-saw mechanism, according to which a particular right-handed neutrino mass eigenstate is associated with a particular physical neutrino mass eigenstate, leading to a form diagonalizable effective neutrino mass matrix. Form Dominance, which allows an arbitrary neutrino mass spectrum, may be regarded as a generalization of Constrained Sequential Dominance which only allows strongly hierarchical neutrino masses. We consider alternative implementations of the see-saw mechanism in minimal A4 see-saw models and show that such models satisfy Form Dominance, leading to neutrino mass sum rules which predict closely spaced neutrino masses with a normal or inverted neutrino mass ordering. To avoid the partial cancellations inherent in such models we propose Natural Form Dominance, in which a different flavon is associated with each physical neutrino mass eigenstate
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
[[alternative]]Related Factors of Teachers’ SARS Knowledge, Beliefs, Preventive Behavioral Intention, and Preventive Teaching Intention in Elementary Schools of Taipei County
[[abstract]]Related Factors of Teachers’ SARS Knowledge, Beliefs, Preventive Behavioral Intention, and Preventive Teaching Intention in Elementary Schools of Taipei County
A Master Thesis By Chen, Mu-Lin
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to examine SARS knowledge, beliefs, preventive behavioral intention, preventive teaching intention, and related factors for the intentions among the elementary schools’ teachers in Taipei County. The participants chosen by cluster sampling method were 573 elementary schools’ teachers who were asked to respond to a self-reported questionnaire. The major findings of this study were as follows:
1.The scores of SARS knowledge the teachers got were low. About 70 percentage of the teachers had the experience of health education, but there were still 30 percentage of the teachers had not the experience. The mission of preventive teaching for SARS needed the corporation of the teachers in schools.
2.The cues to action for SARS mainly included television, network, brochure, and newspaper.
3.There were significant correlations among perceived severity, perceived benefits, and perceived susceptibility with SARS preventive behavioral intention.
4.The self-efficacy significantly correlated with SARS preventive behavioral intention & preventive teaching intention, and could also effectively predict both two intentions.
5.The explanation power (R2) of the SARS preventive behavioral intention by perceived benefits, self-efficacy, gender, the content of teaching, the location of school, and health education teaching toward SARS was 43.9%.
6.The explanation power (R2) of the SARS preventive teaching intention by the teaching time, cues to action, self-efficacy, the content of teaching, jobs, and health education teaching toward SARS was 32.9%.
7.There were significant differences among perceived benefits, perceived barrier, and perceived susceptibility toward gender. Some of demographic variables showed the significant differences for the beliefs of SARS.
8.There were significant correlations among perceived benefits, self-efficacy with cues to action.
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
