1,720,963 research outputs found
Marginalized models for right-truncated and interval-censored time-to-event data
Analysis of clustered data is often performed using random effects regression models. In such conditional models, a cluster-specific random effect is often introduced into the linear predictor function. Parameter interpretation of the covariate effects is then conditioned on the random effects, leading to a subject-specific interpretation of the regression parameters. Recently, Marginalized Multilevel Models (MMM) and the Bridge distribution models have been proposed as a unified approach, which allows one to capture the within-cluster correlations by specifying random effects while still allowing for marginal parameter interpretation. In this paper, we investigate these two approaches, and the conditional Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM), in the context of right-truncated, interval-censored time-to-event data, further characterized by clustering and additional overdispersion. While these models have been applied in literature to model the mean, here we extend their application to modeling the hazard function for the survival endpoints. The models are applied to analyze data from the HET-CAM(VT) experiment which was designed to assess the potential of a compound to cause injection site reaction. Results show that the MMM and Bridge distribution approaches are useful when interest is in the marginal interpretation of the covariate effects
Do we need frailty modeling in the development of prognostic models?
Prognostic models are developed to assist in clinical decision making particularly in regards to patient treatment and follow-up time. The Cox proportional hazards model is the most extensively used in analysis. As such almost all prognostic models in survival data are developed based on Cox models. However, overreliance on the the Cox model alone is common even in the presence of clustering ignoring the intrinsic heterogeneity and dependency present in such data. This project highlight the need for prognostic model building to account for clustering with a case study in Traumatic Brain Injury(TBI). Two approaches are used to account for clustering, the fixed effect and the frailty models. By comparing model parameter estimates and standard errors for these methods against the naive Cox, we demonstrate that lack of accounting for heterogeneity may lead to invalid inference as model parameter estimates have underestimated standard errors leading to inflated type I error. Comparison o
Do we need frailty modeling in the development of prognostic models?
Prognostic models are developed to assist in clinical decision making particularly in regards to patient treatment and follow-up time. The Cox proportional hazards model is the most extensively used in analysis. As such almost all prognostic models in survival data are developed based on Cox models. However, overreliance on the the Cox model alone is common even in the presence of clustering ignoring the intrinsic heterogeneity and dependency present in such data. This project highlight the need for prognostic model building to account for clustering with a case study in Traumatic Brain Injury(TBI). Two approaches are used to account for clustering, the fixed effect and the frailty models. By comparing model parameter estimates and standard errors for these methods against the naive Cox, we demonstrate that lack of accounting for heterogeneity may lead to invalid inference as model parameter estimates have underestimated standard errors leading to inflated type I error. Comparison o
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
