1,721,132 research outputs found
The N-MOmentum trial: Building momentum to advance trial methodology in a rare disease
Full text linkManagement of vascular risk in people with multiple sclerosis at the time of diagnosis in England: a population-based study
Full text linkBACKGROUND: Vascular management in People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) is important given the higher vascular burden than the general population, associated with increased disability and mortality. OBJECTIVES: We assessed differences in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension; and the use of antidiabetic, antihypertensive and lipid-lowering medications at the time of the MS diagnosis. METHODS: This is a population-based study including PwMS and matched controls between 1987 and 2018 in England. RESULTS: We identified 12,251 PwMS and 72,572 matched controls. PwMS had a 30% increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19, 1.42). Among those with type 2 diabetes, PwMS had a 56% lower prevalence of antidiabetic usage (95% CI = 0.33, 0.58). Prevalence of hypertension was 6% greater in PwMS (95% CI = 1.05, 1.06), but in those with hypertension, usage of antihypertensive was 66% lower in PwMS (95% CI = 0.28, 0.42) than controls. Treatment with lipid-lowering medications was 63% lower in PwMS (95% CI = 0.54, 0.74). PwMS had a 0.4-mm Hg lower systolic blood pressure (95% CI = -0.60, -0.13). 3.8% of PwMS were frail. CONCLUSION: At the time of diagnosis, PwMS have an increased prevalence of vascular risk factors, including hypertension and diabetes though paradoxically, there is poorer treatment. Clinical guidelines supporting appropriate vascular assessment and management in PwMS should be developed
Refinement of the Clinical Scenario Evaluation Framework for Assessment of Competing Development Strategies With an Application to Multiple Sclerosis
No full textWhen competing strategies for development programs, clinical trial designs, or data analysis methods exist, the alternatives need to be evaluated in a systematic way to facilitate informed decision making. Here we describe a refinement of the recently proposed clinical scenario evaluation framework for the assessment of competing strategies. The refinement is achieved by subdividing key elements previously proposed into new categories, distinguishing between quantities that can be estimated from preexisting data and those that cannot and between aspects under the control of the decision maker from those that are determined by external constraints. The refined framework is illustrated by an application to a design project for an adaptive seamless design for a clinical trial in progressive multiple sclerosis
Trajectories and management of vascular risk following the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A population-based matched cohort study between 1987 and 2018 in England
Full text linkBackground: People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) have an increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease burden, but this could be mitigated by vascular risk factor management. Objectives: We compared the trajectories of vascular risk factors, vascular comorbidities and clinical management in PwMS against the general population post-MS diagnosis while controlling for frailty. Methods: Retrospective longitudinal analysis using English data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1987 and 2018 comprising PwMS matched with up to six controls without MS by age, sex and general practice. Results: We compared 12,251 PwMS with 72,572 matched controls; 3.8% of PwMS had mild–moderate frailty, 1.2% more than matched controls. Compared to controls, PwMS had an elevated incidence of Type 2 diabetes (HR 1.18, 95% CI (1.04, 1.34)), and starting antihypertensive medications (HR 1.40, 95% CI (1.33, 1.47)). Among those with hypertension at baseline, blood pressure trajectories did not differ between PwMS and controls. PwMS had increased rates of meeting targets for hypertension management (HR 1.25, 95% CI (1.12, 1.41)). Conclusion: The observation that PwMS with hypertension are more likely to meet treatment targets than matched controls is encouraging, but the elevated rates of vascular comorbidities suggest that tighter vascular management may be needed in this population
Assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect in multiple sclerosis trials
No full textMultiple sclerosis (MS) is heterogeneous with respect to outcomes, and evaluating possible heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) is of high interest. HTE is non-random variation in the magnitude of a treatment effect on a clinical outcome across levels of a covariate (i.e. a patient attribute or set of attributes). Multiple statistical techniques can evaluate HTE. The simplest but most bias-prone is conventional one variable-at-a-time subgroup analysis. Recently, multivariable predictive approaches have been promoted to provide more patient-centered results, by accounting for multiple relevant attributes simultaneously. We review approaches used to estimate HTE in clinical trials of MS
Refinement of the Clinical Scenario Evaluation Framework for Assessment of Competing Development Strategies With an Application to Multiple Sclerosis
No full textWhen competing strategies for development programs, clinical trial designs, or data analysis methods exist, the alternatives need to be evaluated in a systematic way to facilitate informed decision making. Here we describe a refinement of the recently proposed clinical scenario evaluation framework for the assessment of competing strategies. The refinement is achieved by subdividing key elements previously proposed into new categories, distinguishing between quantities that can be estimated from preexisting data and those that cannot and between aspects under the control of the decision maker from those that are determined by external constraints. The refined framework is illustrated by an application to a design project for an adaptive seamless design for a clinical trial in progressive multiple sclerosis
Over three decades study populations in progressive multiple sclerosis have become older and more disabled, but have lower on-trial progression rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 randomised placebo-controlled trials
No full textBackground: Progression is the major driver of disability and cost in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the search for treatments in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) has not mirrored the success in relapsing MS. Objectives: To assess changes in PMS trials over time. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were searched to identify randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in PMS. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used, study quality was assessed and trends were examined by regression. Results: Placebo groups of 43 studies published between 1988 and 2018 were included. The mean age at trial entry increased by 9.8 years per decade (95% confidence interval (CI): [2.7; 4.9]; p \u0026lt; 0.001). Mean baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores increased by 0.36 points (95% CI: [0.09; 0.62]; p = 0.009) and disease durations at baseline were prolonged by 1.8 years (95% CI: [0.7; 2.9]; p = 0.003) per decade. The trials became larger, specifically placebo groups increased by about 222 patients (95% CI: [36; 409]; p = 0.021) and 88 patients (95% CI: [12; 165]; p = 0.025) per decade for primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS), respectively. The proportion of patients on placebo experiencing disability progression within 24 months decreased by 7.6 percentage points (95% CI: [1.2; 14.1]; p = 0.022) per year. Conclusion: Over three decades, PMS trial populations changed and are now older, with a longer disease duration and more disability, with lower on-trial progression rates
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Human haematopoietic stem cell (CD34+ subset) transplantation in acute ischaemic stroke
Full text linkStroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Globally, 15 million people suffer a stroke each year, of whom more than 5 million die, and a further 5 million are left permanently disabled. Current treatment options offer modest benefits, and there is a pressing need for new and effective treatments.
Stem cell therapy is a well-established treatment modality for haematological diseases, with its use now being explored in different disease processes, including neurological diseases, as well as vascular conditions such as ischaemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disease. Promising results have been seen in animal models of stroke, with evidence of significant functional benefits. Translation to the bedside, however, is in its infancy.
Bone marrow is an attractive source of stem cells, being easily accessible, and suitable for autologous use. CD34+ cells represent a subset of bone marrow derived mononuclear cells which have been studied in pre-clinical models of stroke. This study investigates the potential therapeutic role of autologous CD34+ cells in acute ischaemic stroke patients in a Phase I clinical trial
- …
