1,720,961 research outputs found
Ruolo diagnostico, prognostico e predittivo di risposta del NETest nelle neoplasie neuroendocrine
Il NETest è una metodica di biologia molecolare e, in particolare, di biopsia liquida, applicata alle neoplasie neuroendocrine (NEN), che si propone come nuovo biomarcatore altamente sensibile e specifico. Il NETest consente una sorta di gene signature del tumore, definendone il profilo trascrizionale mRNA, estratto dal sangue periferico. L’applicazione pratica è nella diagnosi, dove il NETest sembra identificare anche piccoli tumori localizzati, nella definizione prognostica, con l’identificazione dei tumori con maggiore tendenza alla progressione e alla recidiva post-chirurgica, nella riposta ai trattamenti, con l’identificazione precoce di progressione nel corso di terapie anti-tumorali. A fronte di risultati iniziali estremamente promettenti, il NETest necessita di una conferma su larga scala, in ampie casistiche multicentriche
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
NETest: a systematic review focusing on the prognostic and predictive role
The NETest is a standardized and reproducible liquid biopsy for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). It evaluates the expression of 51 NET genes by real-time polymerase chain reaction,
providing an accurate molecular profile of the neoplasm. Diagnostic utility of NETest has been widely demonstrated, while its role in predicting prognosis and treatment response is less studied. This systematic review aims to collect and discuss the available evidence on the prognostic and predictive role of NETest, trying to answer 3 questions, frequently raised in clinical practice. Is NETest able to differentiate stable
from progressive disease? Increased NETest levels (at least >40%) correlate with disease progression. Is NETest able to predict tumor progression and tumor response to treatment?
Some studies demonstrated that the baseline NETest score >33–40% could predict tumor progression. Moreover, NETestperformed after treatment (as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy) could predict treatment response also before radiological findings, since the decrease or stability of NETest score predicts tumor response to treatment. Is NETest able to evaluate tumor recurrence risk after surgery? NETest can predict surgical treatment outcome detecting minimal residual disease after radical surgery, which is characterized by a lower but positive NETest score (20–40%), while a higher
score (>33–40%) is associated with nonradical surgery. In conclusion, in addition to its demonstrated diagnostic role, this systematic review highlights the efficacy of NETest to assess
disease status at the moment of the NETest execution and to predict tumor recurrence after surgery. The efficacy for other applications should be proven by additional studies
Validation of ACR TI-RADS performance in transition age. Results from a multicenter retrospective study by the TALENT study group
Purpose: Although thyroid nodules are less common in the pediatric population, the risk of malignancy is higher than in adult patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ultrasonographic predictive factors of malignancy in thyroid nodules and to validate American College of Radiologists (ACR) TI-RADS performance in transition age patients. Methods: One hundred forty-two patients aged between 14 and 21 years referred to the participating centers for FNA biopsy of a thyroid nodule between 2007 and 2022 were included and ultrasound reports and sonographic images were retrospectively analyzed. Nodule features were defined according to the ACR-TIRADS lexicon. Two reference standards were applied: FNA cytology and surgical histology. The diagnostic performance of single sonographic features was estimated. Significant predictors were then included in a multivariate regression model. Results: Nodules included in ACR-TIRADS categories TR4 or TR5 had 10-fold increased risk of indeterminate or suspicious/malignant cytology [p < 0.001]. In univariate analysis, solid composition [p = 0.016] and presence of hyperechoic foci [p = 0.040] significantly increased the likelihood of malignant histology. In multivariate regression analysis, irregular margins [p = 0.011] and hyperechoic foci [p = 0.019] were independent predictors of indeterminate or suspicious/malignant cytology. Conclusion: Nodules included in ACR-TIRADS categories TR4 or TR5 had 10-fold increased risk of indeterminate or suspicious/malignant cytology in transition age. ACR-TIRADS was not able to rule-out malignancy compared to FNAB alone, suggesting the need to reconsider recommendations in the transition age group
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
