1,720,996 research outputs found
Validating chest MRI to detect and monitor cystic fibrosis lung disease in a pediatric cohort
No full textBackground: Computed Tomography (CT) is the gold standard to assess bronchiectasis and trapped air in cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease, but has the disadvantage of radiation exposure. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a radiation free alternative.
Objective: To validate MRI as outcome measure by: correlating MRI scores for bronchiectasis and trapped air with clinical parameters, and by comparing those MRI scores with CT scores.
Methods: In patients with CF (aged 5.6-17.4 years), MRI and CT were alternated annually during routine annual check-ups between July 2007 and January 2010. Twenty-three children had an MRI performed 1 year prior to CT, 34 children had a CT 1 year prior to MRI. Bronchiectasis and trapped air were scored using the CF-MRI and CF-CT scoring system. CF-MRI scores were correlated with clinical parameters: FEV1 , Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pulmonary exacerbations and patient-reported respiratory symptoms measured on the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), using Spearman's correlation coefficient. MRI and CT scores were compared using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.
Results: Fifty-seven patients who had an MRI, CT and CFQ-R during the study period were included. CF-MRI bronchiectasis correlated with FEV1 , Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pulmonary exacerbations and patient-reported respiratory symptoms. CF-MRI trapped air only correlated with FEV1 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ICCs between MRI and CT bronchiectasis and trapped air were 0.41 and 0.35 respectively. MRI tended to overestimate bronchiectasis compared to CT.
Conclusion: The associations between CF-MRI scores and several important clinical parameters further contributes to the validation of MRI. MRI provides different information than CT
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Aspergillus-related lung disease in people with cystic fibrosis: can imaging help us to diagnose disease?
Full text linkIn people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF), viscous sputum and dysfunction of the mucociliary escalator leads to early and chronic infections. The prevalence of Aspergillus fumigatus in sputum is high in PwCF and the contribution of A. fumigatus to the progression of structural lung disease has been reported. However, overall, relatively little is known about the contribution of A. fumigatus to CF lung disease. More knowledge is needed to aid clinical decisions on whether to start antifungal treatment. In this review, we give an overview of A. fumigatus colonisation and infection in PwCF and the different types of pulmonary disease caused by it. Furthermore, we discuss the current evidence for structural lung damage associated with A. fumigatus in PwCF on chest computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. We conclude that radiological outcomes to identify disease caused by A. fumigatus can be important for clinical studies and management
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
