1,720,971 research outputs found
Lexical development in bilingual preschool children
No full textAlthough bilingualism has been a long-standing topic of interest for scientists of different disciplines(philosophers, psychologists, linguists), most of our current knowledge is not easily applicable to situations that clinicians and researchers face as a result of a recent increase in immigration. This review analyses recent studies investigating vocabulary development in bilingual preschool children who have been simultaneously exposed to the language of their parents' country and to the language of their host country since birth. This review highlights the characteristics of bilingual development and methodological concerns in the assessment of bilingualism. After a general introduction of bilingual language development, this review focuses on the role of linguistic input in bilingual lexical acquisition and diverse approaches to lexical assessment in simultaneous bilingual preschool children
High values of baseline and 24-hour mean arterial pressure are associated with lower chance of early neurological improvement in acute stroke patients treated with thrombolysis
No full textPrimo sviluppo del linguaggio, differenze individuali e indici di rischio in bambini monolingui e bilingui
No full textLanguage Acquisition by Bilingual Deaf Preschoolers: Theoretical, Methodological Issues and Empirical Data
No full textLa comprensione linguistica fra i 2-3 anni di età: l’uso del test “Parole in Gioco” in modalità cartacea e computerizzata
No full textOn line screening and profiles of language delays in very preterm and moderate preterm children compared to full term children 30 months
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
