1,720,957 research outputs found
A Dataset of Standard and Abrupt Industrial Gestures Recorded Through MIMUs
Full text linkConsidering the human-centric approach promoted by Industry 5.0, safety becomes a crucial aspect in scenarios of human–robot interaction, especially when abrupt human movements occur due to inattention or unexpected circumstances. To this end, human motion tracking is necessary to promote a safe and efficient human–machine interaction. Literature datasets related to the industrial context generally contain controlled and repetitive gestures tracked with visual systems or magneto-inertial measurement units (MIMUs), without considering the occurrence of unexpected events that might cause operators’ abrupt movements. Accordingly, the aim of this paper is to present the dataset DASIG (Dataset of Standard and Abrupt Industrial Gestures) related to both standard typical industrial movements and abrupt movements registered through MIMUs. Sixty healthy working-age participants were asked to perform standard pick-and-place gestures interspersed with unexpected abrupt movements triggered by visual or acoustic alarms. The dataset contains MIMUs signals collected during the execution of the task, data related to the temporal generation of alarms, anthropometric data of all participants, and a script for demonstrating DASIG usability. All raw data are provided, and the collected dataset is suitable for several analyses related to the industrial context (gesture recognition, motion planning, ergonomics, safety, statistics, etc.)
Comparison of Gait Smoothness Metrics in Healthy Elderly and Young People
Full text linkThe goal of this study is to compare gait smoothness using different metrics. Methodologically, harmonic ratio (HR), spectral arc length (SPARC) and log dimensionless jerk (LDLJ) metrics were applied to acceleration and angular velocity data collected during gait using a wearable inertial sensor placed on the trunk. Sixteen healthy elderly (68.3 ± 4.4 years) and sixteen young (22.6 ± 1.1 years) participants volunteered for the analysis. They were requested to walk at self-selected normal and fast velocities. The results obtained with the three metrics showed variations in smoothness within and between groups. Notably, the older group exhibited contradictory smoothness trends compared to prior studies, presenting a smoother gait than the younger cohort, except for specific directional accelerations. Contradictory outcomes arose between metrics, challenging the influence of age on gait smoothness. Despite concerns about LDLJ’s susceptibility to disturbances, it emerged as the most robust metric. Conversely, HR exhibited alignment with the existing literature on specific acceleration directions. The differences observed in gait smoothness between the two age groups while walking at different speeds suggest that pace might affect smoothness evaluation. The study posits that aging may have a less pronounced impact on gait smoothness compared to cognitive impairment, implying potential clinical utility in discerning age-related gait changes. These findings highlighted the importance of a comprehensive approach to estimating gait smoothness, integrating different metrics and considering several walking speeds, crucial for understanding age-related gait alterations and their clinical implications
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
