1,720,969 research outputs found

    Lo studio FAST: FAringotonsillite STreptococcica in età pediatrica. Impatto farmacoeconomico delle Linee Guida dell'American Academy of Pediatrics sulla pratica clinica di 600 pediatri italiani

    Full text link
    The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has recently published its new guidelines for the treatment of pediatric tonsillopharyngitis; a diagnostic test for the detection of streptococci is recommended, followed by a treatment with penicillins (10 days) or cephalosporins (5 days) in case of positivity, and by no treatment otherwise. The success of a guideline, in general, depends on its diffusion in practice and on its adaptability to different local settings. The aim of the present study (FAST) was the evaluation of the clinical and economical impact of the application of the AAP guidelines in the Italian reality. The study was conducted with the cooperation of 600 pediatricians, uniformly distributed on the Italian territory, and involved 3072 patients. The pediatricians were left free to decide whether to follow the guidelines or not. The results of the analysis indicate that only some 20% of the pediatricians adhered to the suggested protocol; the total cost (calculated in the perspective of the National Health System, with a time horizon of about 3 months) per patient, nonetheless, resulted inferior in the group treated according to the proposed protocol (50,45 • vs. 53,30 •). Furthermore, a lower incidence of complications occurred in these patients. Among the “off-protocol” behaviors, two showed particularly evident misuse of health resources: inappropriate treatment after test positivity (59,15 •/patient), and treatment after test negativity (14% of the total population). Another interesting, although not surprising, result of this study was the evidence that penicillins are as effective as cephalosporins in the short-term, but significantly inferior in terms of complications, positivity for streptococci at the control test, and complications detected at follow-up

    Erratum: An economic evaluation of aripiprazole vs olanzapine adapted to the Italian setting using outcomes of metabolic syndrome and risk for diabetes in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 4: 967–976

    No full text
    ErratumColombo GL, Caruggi M, Di Matteo, et al. 2008. An economic evaluation of aripiprazole vs olanzapine adapted to the Italian setting using outcomes of metabolic syndrome and risk for diabetes in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat, 4: 967–976.Page 972, Results, right column, last paragraph. The second sentence should read:In the simulated cohort of 1000 patients, the values with aripiprazole for 26 weeks showed the avoidance of 34 events of diabetes over 5 years (28 in discounted scenario), resulting in total cost savings of €1,933.24 (€1,472.52 in discounted scenario).Page 973, Table 5:Under Events avoided/1000 schizophrenia patients (5 years): 18 should read 28.Under Cost/metabolic syndrome avoided (5 years): −€2,860.52 should read −€1,852.73

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore