1,720,975 research outputs found
RRS Discovery Cruises 112 and 115, 3-18 August and 4-17 December 1980. Tide recording between Grand Banks of Newfoundland and West Biscay
Get PDFRRS "Discovery" Cruises 95 and 97, 25 October - 17 November and 6-21 December 1978. Tide recording in the Tropical Atlantic and equatorial hydrology at 27.5 and 32.5 West Meridians
Get PDFRRS Discovery Cruises 56 and 58, 30th October - 7th November and 5th December- 15th December 1973. International comparison of tidal pressure sensors, North Bay of Biscay
Get PDF
RRS Discovery Cruise 74, legs 1 and 3. 3 - 15 September and 28 September - 13 October 1975. Oceanic tidal survey covering shelf edge south and west of Ireland and along 53.5 parallel to 30 West Meridian
Get PDFRRS Discovery Cruise 68 (3 legs), 1 November - 15 December 1974. Oceanic tidal survey from N. Biscay Shelf to Azores, geophysical surveys NE of Azores, biological hauls near 44N 13W, and testing of miscellaneous physical equipment
Get PDFRRS Discovery Cruise 78 (3 legs), 8 September - 18 October 1976. Oceanic tidal recording SE and SW of Iceland and tests and use of side-scan sonar west of Hebrides
Get PDFEstimates of internal tide energy fluxes from Topex/Poseidon altimetry: central North Pacific
No full text
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
