1,720,956 research outputs found
Recherches sur les correspondances latines mineures de l'époque carolingienne. Présentation, traduction annotée, étude littéraire
No full textThis thesis is composed by the translation and the study of a corpus which contains forty one letters, written during Charlemagne's reign by various scholars from different cultural areas of the actual Europe who spent time at the sovereign's court. These missives, which, for the most part, have not been translated in French, are generally not much studied by scholars, or are analysed mainly from a historical and theological point of view. A first volume comprises the commentary of these letters: it endeavours to analyse what is at stake in these texts literarily, culturally and historically, especially through the research of scriptural and patristic sources. Then, an overview part aiming at proposing an extension of the reflection sums up the gramatical conceptions which underlie these missives by highlighting the link set up during the Carolingian period between grammar and categories from the Aristotelian-Boecian tradition. It suggests considering the conception of the texts which compose our corpus through a common thinking system by putting them, in parallel with other Carolingian creations, in their specific cultural context. The second volume offers a translation of the letters, facing their Latin version, in order to enlighten the scriptural and patristic sources by a double apparatus and to elucidate some passages of the texts by a third level of notes.Cette thèse présente la traduction et l'étude d'un corpus constitué de quarante-et-une lettres, composées sous le règne de Charlemagne par divers lettrés issus de différentes aires culturelles de l'actuelle Europe qui fréquentèrent la cour du souverain. Ces missives, qui, pour la plupart, n'ont pas été traduites en français, sont généralement peu étudiées par la critique, ou sont commentées majoritairement d'un point de vue historique et théologique. Un premier volume comprend le commentaire de ces lettres, qui s'efforce d'en analyser les enjeux littéraires, culturels et historiques, notamment à partir de la recherche de sources scripturaires et patristiques. Une partie de synthèse visant à proposer un prolongement de la réflexion récapitule ensuite les conceptions grammaticales qui sous-tendent ces missives en soulignant le lien établi à l'époque carolingienne entre la grammaire et les catégories issues de la tradition aristotélico-boécienne. Elle propose d'envisager la conception des textes de notre corpus à partir d'un système de pensée commun en les replaçant, parallèlement à d'autres productions carolingiennes, dans le contexte culturel qui leur est propre. Le second volume présente une traduction des lettres en vis-à-vis de leur version latine, afin d'en éclairer les sources scripturaires et patristiques au moyen d'un double apparat et d'en élucider certains passages par un troisième étage de notes
Research on the minor Latin correspondences of the Carolingian period. Presentation, annotated translation, literary study
No full textCette thèse présente la traduction et l'étude d'un corpus constitué de quarante-et-une lettres, composées sous le règne de Charlemagne par divers lettrés issus de différentes aires culturelles de l'actuelle Europe qui fréquentèrent la cour du souverain. Ces missives, qui, pour la plupart, n'ont pas été traduites en français, sont généralement peu étudiées par la critique, ou sont commentées majoritairement d'un point de vue historique et théologique. Un premier volume comprend le commentaire de ces lettres, qui s'efforce d'en analyser les enjeux littéraires, culturels et historiques, notamment à partir de la recherche de sources scripturaires et patristiques. Une partie de synthèse visant à proposer un prolongement de la réflexion récapitule ensuite les conceptions grammaticales qui sous-tendent ces missives en soulignant le lien établi à l'époque carolingienne entre la grammaire et les catégories issues de la tradition aristotélico-boécienne. Elle propose d'envisager la conception des textes de notre corpus à partir d'un système de pensée commun en les replaçant, parallèlement à d'autres productions carolingiennes, dans le contexte culturel qui leur est propre. Le second volume présente une traduction des lettres en vis-à-vis de leur version latine, afin d'en éclairer les sources scripturaires et patristiques au moyen d'un double apparat et d'en élucider certains passages par un troisième étage de notes.This thesis is composed by the translation and the study of a corpus which contains forty one letters, written during Charlemagne's reign by various scholars from different cultural areas of the actual Europe who spent time at the sovereign's court. These missives, which, for the most part, have not been translated in French, are generally not much studied by scholars, or are analysed mainly from a historical and theological point of view. A first volume comprises the commentary of these letters: it endeavours to analyse what is at stake in these texts literarily, culturally and historically, especially through the research of scriptural and patristic sources. Then, an overview part aiming at proposing an extension of the reflection sums up the gramatical conceptions which underlie these missives by highlighting the link set up during the Carolingian period between grammar and categories from the Aristotelian-Boecian tradition. It suggests considering the conception of the texts which compose our corpus through a common thinking system by putting them, in parallel with other Carolingian creations, in their specific cultural context. The second volume offers a translation of the letters, facing their Latin version, in order to enlighten the scriptural and patristic sources by a double apparatus and to elucidate some passages of the texts by a third level of notes
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
