1,720,957 research outputs found
Patient characteristics associated with the acceptability of teleconsultation: a retrospective study of osteoporotic patients post-COVID-19
Full text linkBackground: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, teleconsultations (TCs) have become common practice for many chronic conditions, including osteoporosis. While satisfaction with TCs among patients increases in times of emergency, we have little knowledge of whether the acceptability of TCs persists once in-person visits return to being a feasible and safe option. In this study, we assess the acceptability of TCs across five dimensions for osteoporosis care among patients who started or continued with TCs after the COVID-19 pandemic had waned. We then explore the patient characteristics associated with these perceptions. Methods: Between January and April 2022, 80 osteoporotic patients treated at the Humanitas Hospital in Milan, Italy, were recruited to answer an online questionnaire about the acceptability of TCs for their care. The acceptability of TCs was measured using a modified version of the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ), which identifies five domains of acceptability: perceived benefits, satisfaction, substitution, privacy and discomfort, and care personnel concerns. Multivariable ordinary least squares (OLS) linear regression analysis was performed to assess which patient characteristics in terms of demographics, socio-economic conditions, digital skills, social support, clinical characteristics and pattern of TC use were correlated with the five domains of acceptability measured through the SUTAQ. Results: The degree of acceptability of TCs was overall good across the 80 respondents and the five domains. Some heterogeneity in perceptions emerged with respect to TCs substituting for in-person visits, negatively impacting continuity of care and reducing the length of consultations. For the most part, acceptability was not affected by patient characteristics with a few exceptions related to treatment time and familiarity with the TC service modality (i.e., length of osteoporosis treatment and number of TCs experienced by the patient). Conclusions: TCs appear to be an acceptable option for osteoporosis care in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study suggests that other characteristics besides age, digital skills and social support, which are traditionally relevant to TC acceptability, should be taken into account in order to better target this care delivery modality
A participatory process to design an app to improve adherence to anti-osteoporotic therapies: a development and usability study
Full text linkObjective: The aim of the study was to develop an app to improve patients’ adherence to therapy for osteoporosis and to test its usability.
Methods: In Phase I, the app functions needed to improve medication adherence were identified through a focus group with six patients with osteoporosis and a joint interview with two bone specialists. The app prototype was then developed (Phase II) and refined after its feasibility testing (Phase III) for 13–25 days by eight patients. Finally, the app underwent usability testing (Phase IV) for 6 months by nine other patients. The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) was used to collect the assessment of the app by the 17 patients.
Results: The final version of the app provided information on osteoporosis, allowed patients to contact the bone specialist for
an additional consultation and generated a reminder for taking medications accompanied by feedback on adherence. The assessment of the app was positive but evaluations differed between the feasibility and usability testing, with the former displaying a significantly (p≤.05) better assessment across all MAUQ items.
Conclusions: In this study, we tested an app for improving adherence to medical therapies in patients with osteoporosis. The usability testing revealed a lower “patient-centered” performance of the app as compared to that observed during the feasibility phase. Future developments of the study include increasing the testing cohort and adding a technical support during the usability testing
Improvement of medication adherence in osteoporosis through telemedicine combined with email: a patient-reported experience and outcome measure-based prospective study
Full text linkObjectives To evaluate whether adherence to oral bisphosphonate in patients with osteoporosis may be improved by teleconsultation (TC) with or without combined use of email to contact the bone specialist on-demand (enhanced TC). Methods 103 naïve patients with osteoporosis were prescribed branded alendronate (70 mg weekly) and randomised to three service modalities (presence, TC and enhanced TC), and evaluated for medication adherence after 12 months of follow-up. Patients allocated to the enhanced TC were provided with the opportunity to contact the bone specialists by email without any restriction. Patient-reported outcome(PROMs) and experience measures (PREMs) were evaluated with respect to the service modality. Results Of 89 patients who were persistent to therapy, 66% displayed optimal medication adherence, with odds being 4.5 higher in patients receiving enhanced TC versus those receiving the other services. TC service modality was considered in general to be worse in quality than in presence visits, whereas the combination with email use as in enhanced TC was sufficient to compensate for the perceived decrease in quality of care. Enhanced TC did not have any impact on the perception of quality of life as assessed by PROMs. Discussion In patients with osteoporosis, TC did not provide any advantage over traditional in presence visits in terms of improvement of adherence to therapy. However, when TC was combined with email to contact the bone specialist on demand, there was a significant improvement in adherence to the prescribed drug. Conclusions Patients with osteoporosis need to be supported after drug prescription to guarantee optimal medication therapy
Improvement of medication adherence in osteoporosis through telemedicine combined with email: a patient-reported experience and outcome measure-based prospective study
No full textTo evaluate whether adherence to oral bisphosphonate in patients with osteoporosis may be improved by teleconsultation (TC) with or without the combined use of email to contact the bone specialist on demand (enhanced TC). 103 naïve patients with osteoporosis were prescribed branded alendronate (70mg weekly) and randomised to three service modalities (presence, TC and enhanced TC) and evaluated for medication adherence after 12 months of follow-up. Patients allocated to the enhanced TC were provided with the opportunity to contact the bone specialists by email without any restriction.
Patient-reported outcome (PROMs) and measures (patient reported experience measures) were evaluated with respect to the service modality.
Of 89 patients who were persistent to therapy, 66% displayed optimal medication adherence, with odds being 4.5 higher in patients receiving enhanced TC versus
those receiving the other services. TC service modality was considered in general to be worse in quality than in presence visits, whereas the combination with email use as in enhanced TC was sufficient to compensate for the perceived decrease in quality of care. Enhanced TC did not have any impact on the perception of quality of life as assessed by PROMs
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
