121,477 research outputs found
CARRILLO, Juan Antonio
No full textLetter from Mr. Juan Antonio Carrillo to Gen. Alvaro Obregón, informing him of the irregularities in the elections in Zacatecas. Letter from Gen. Alvaro Obregón to Gen. Benjamín G. Hill recommending Mr. Juan Antonio Carrillo. File C-30 / Carta del Sr. Juan Antonio Carrillo al Gral. Alvaro Obregón, informándole de las irregularidades en las elecciones en Zacatecas. Carta del Gral. Alvaro Obregón al Gral. Benjamín G. Hill recomendando al Sr. Juan Antonio Carrillo. Exp. C-3
Análisis y técnica de manufactura del Códice Azoyú 2. Antropología. Boletín Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia: Cien años. Anales del Museo Nacional de México (1877-1977). Num. 69 Nueva Época (2003) enero-marzo
No full textCarrillo y Gariel, Abelardo, Técnica de la pintura de la Nueva España, México, UNAM-Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, 1946, p. 35.De Gortari, Eli, Del saber y de la técnica del México antiguo, México, UNAM (Complementos del Seminario de Problemas Científicos y Filosóficos 3,nueva época), 1987, p. 49.Gettens, R. J. y G. L. Stout, Painting Materials. A Short Encyclopaedia, New York, Dover Publications Inc., 1966, p. 117.Glass, John, Catálogo de la Colección de Códices, México, INAH-Museo Nacional de Antropología, 1964, p. 165.Huerta Carrillo, Alejandro , “Análisis de materiales del Códice Azoyú 1”, en Constanza Vega Sosa, Códice Azoyú 1. El Reino de Tlachinolan, México, FCE, 1991, p. 128.Huerta Carrillo. Alejandro , “Análisis químico y técnica de manufactura del Códice Moctezuma”, inédito, p. 8.Huerta Carrillo, Alejandro , “Análisis de la policromía de los petroglifos de la Estructura A”, en Constanza Vega Sosa, El recinto sagrado de México-Tenochtitlan, México, SEP-INAH, 1979, pp. 87-94.Huerta Carrillo, Alejandro, “Estudio de la policromía de la Piedra de la Luna-Coyolxauhqui”, en Churubusco, México, INAH-Dirección de Restauración, 1977, p. 93.Huerta Carrillo, Alejandro, “Análisis de la pintura mural de la Zona Arqueológica de Palenque, Chiapas”, en Segundo Encuentro Nacional de Restauradores del Patrimonio Cultural, México, INAH-Dirección de Restauración del Patrimonio Cultural, 1983, p. 23.Huerta Carrillo, Alejandro, y Eugenia Berthier V., “Códices, la ciencia al rescate”, inédito, 1999, p. 8.Landa A., Ma. Elena et al., La Garrafa, México, Gobierno del Estado de Puebla / INAH/SEP, 1988, p. 244.Stromberg, Gobi (coord.), El Universo del Amate, México, SEP-Museo Nacional de Culturas Populares, 1982, pp. 13, 23.Torres Montes, Luis, “Materiales y técnica de la pintura mural de Teotihuacan”, en Teotihuacan, México, Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología, 1972, p. 23.Vega, Constanza, Códices y Documentos sobre México, México, INAH (Serie Historia), 1994, pp. 165-168
Decolonizing trends in contemporary Maya literature: Frameworks for reading Isaac Carrillo Can
No full textThis dissertation explores the work of the late author Isaac Carrillo Can (1983 – 2017), including the novel U yóok’otilo’ob áak’ab/Danzas de la noche (2011), poems in the Maya/Spanish anthology Kuxa’an t’aan: Voz viva del Mayab (2012), and the play U kíimil Yuum K’iin/La muerte del Sol (2012), among others. Scholarship of Maya literature, especially Unwriting Maya Literature (2019) by literary scholars Paul M. Worley and Rita M. Palacios, moves to “recover” Maya cultural production from non-Maya cultural influences. Drawing from postcolonial theory, anthropology, and Latin American cultural studies, this dissertation modifies Worley and Palacios’ framework. It argues that scholars should consider 1), Maya-language philosophical perspectives in critical readings of literary works alongside Western literary criticism and 2), the individuality of Indigenous authors to acknowledge their unique contributions as public intellectuals and cultural representatives.
The first chapter provides information about the social contexts within which Isaac Carrillo Can developed as an author and also provides a review of the current state of literary criticism of Maya literatures.
The second chapter, “Inláak’ech in the Works of Isaac Carrillo Can: Revisiting Cultural Logic for Contemporary Maya Literature,” provides an introductory analysis of Isaac Carrillo Can’s major works. The main argument is that readers acknowledge that Indigenous language authors are individuals rather than archetypal representatives of their languages and cultures, borrowing from linguistic anthropologist Paja Faudree’s research which suggests that we gain greater insight to the dynamics of Indigenous authorship at the group level by honoring the individuality of authors. Specifically, the chapter explores the apparently contradictory argument that Isaac Carrillo Can’s definition of inláak’ech (“my other is you,” or “you are the other me”) is both particular to Carrillo Can, but also a broader example of a Maya cultural logic of intersubjectivity.
“Iknal and the Third Space in Carrillo Can’s Self-Translated Maya/Spanish Poetry” argues that self-translation between Maya and Castilian allows authors to write two distinct versions of their works addressing distinct audiences. Postcolonial philosopher Homi Bhabha’s “Third Space” provides a model for examining these relationships. The chapter introduces iknal, a Maya-language deictic term which has been theorized by linguistic anthropologist William F. Hanks and Maya academic Juan Castillo Cocom. In Maya/Castilian poetry, the iknal points to an invisible narrator commenting upon relationships between languages and social groups. Chapter Three, then, examines iknal, an intersubjective field of agency which connotes both absence and presence, self and other, to show that Carrillo Can uses the Maya and Castilian version of the same poem to create a third space.
The fourth chapter, “Universalizing Maya Theatre,” argues that Carrillo Can elevates the status of Maya language theatre in two principal ways: 1), By asserting that Maya language is sufficient for describing the destinies of all people and 2), through autoethnographic self-critique. Carrillo Can’s play U kíimil Yuum K’iin/La muerte del Sol forwards a message consistent with decoloniality as described by Colombian philosopher Santiago Castro Gómez by addressing local and universal audiences simultaneously. Turning to Jakaltek anthropologist Victor Montejo’s approaches to pan-Maya activism, Chapter 3 also examines the play, U yóok’ot wáayo’ob/Danza de los Wáay, and examines how it presents an autoethnographic self-critique. In so doing, departs from previous examples of theatre that present unidimensional Maya protagonists.
The focus on an individual author problematizes unconscious assumptions that Maya authors all share the same ideas about language, culture, and politics. The framework presented in this dissertation addresses concerns regarding both the individual agency of Indigenous authors and the collective agency of the groups in which they claim membership by taking into account 1), the unique interpretations of collective knowledge that Isaac Carrillo Can forwards through his work and 2), the extratextual, social circumstances through which other authors like him share their work with growing, international audiences. In brief, it shows the importance of contemporary Maya literature through the analysis of Isaac Carrillo Can’s work, which stands alone.Embargo status: Restricted to TTU community only. To view, login with your eRaider (top right). Others may request the author grant access exception by clicking on the PDF link to the left
Homenajes fúnebres tributados á la memoria del ilustrísimo señor doctor Don Crescencio Carrillo y Ancona, obispo de Yucatán : con motivo de su muerte, acaecida el 19 de marzo de 1897.
No full text"La obra se hizo bajo la dirección de los sres. D. Delio Moreno Cantón, D. Andrés Saenz de Santamaría, D. Arturo Gamboa Guzmán y D. Fernando Juanes G. Gutiérrez"--P. [89].Cover title."Se imprimieron 800 ejemplares.""Catálogo general de las obras del illmo. y rvmo. sr. dr. D. Crescencio Carrillo y Ancona": p. 80-88.Mode of access: Internet
China’s Peasants and Workers: Changing Class Identities, Beatriz Carrillo y David S.G. Goodman.
No full textReseña del libro:China’s Peasants and Workers: Changing Class Identities (2012), Beatriz Carrillo y David S. G. Goodman, University of Sydney, Australia
Bibliographie Hilarion G. Petzold 1958 – 2009 mit Anhang als Einführung
No full textDieses Archiv enthält die Gesamtbibliographie der Werke des Autors nebst einiger Texte „Über H. G. Petzold“ im Schlussteil der Bibliographie sowie einen Anhang mit einer Einführung in die Architektur des Werkes in seinem wissenslogischen Aufbau als Ausarbeitung seines „Tree of Science Modells“ (2007).This archive contains the complete bibliography of the author and some texts about H. G. Petzold, moreover an epilogue with an introduction to the architecture of the works in its epistemological structure and composition and as an elaborations of Petzold’s „Tree of Science Modell (2007).https://www.fpi-publikation.de/polyloge/01-2009-petzold-h-g-gesamtbibliographie-h-g-petzold-1958-2009-updating-november2009/peerReviewedpublishedVersio
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
