1,721,041 research outputs found

    Exploring the influence of spatio-temporal scale differences in coupled data assimilation

    Full text link
    Identifying the optimal strategy for initializing coupled climate prediction systems is challenging due to the spatio-temporal scale separation and disparities in the observational network. We aim to clarify when strongly coupled data assimilation (SCDA) is preferable to weakly coupled data assimilation (WCDA). We use a two-components coupled Lorenz-63 system, mimicking the atmosphere and the ocean, and the Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) to compare WCDA and SCDA for diverse spatio-temporal scale separations and observational networks - only in the atmosphere, the ocean, or both components. In the fully observed scenario, SCDA and WCDA yield similar performances. However, little differences are present, and we conjecture these are due to the SCDA being more sensitive to the approximations at the basis of the EnKF present in the cross-update - linear analysis update and sampling error, and how they impact the cross-update between ocean and atmosphere. This sensitivity increases as the temporal scale separation increases and is stronger on the slow and large-scale components. When observations are only in one of the components, the spatio-temporal scale separation influences SCDA's performance. In this scenario, the largest improvements are found when the observed component has a smaller spatial scale. The fast-to-slow update has a larger benefit with a larger temporal scale separation. Meanwhile, with the slow-to-fast update, the improvement is limited to instances when the temporal scale separation is less than one-half. This suggests that SCDA of fast atmospheric observations can potentially improve the large and slow ocean component. Conversely, observations of the fine ocean can improve the large atmosphere at a comparable temporal scale. However, when both components are highly chaotic, and the observed component's spatial scale is the largest, SCDA does not improve over WCDA. In such a case, the cross-updates may become too sensitive to data assimilation approximations. We further validated that WCDA systematically outperforms uncoupled data assimilation (UCDA) in both components, legitimizing the transition toward WCDA

    Dataset and neural network weights to the paper: "Generative diffusion for regional surrogate models from sea-ice simulations"

    No full text
    <p>All the needed code and data to reproduce the results from the paper: "Generative diffusion for regional surrogate models from sea-ice simulations".<br>While most of the code is a frozen clone of the original <a href="https://github.com/cerea-daml/diffusion-nextsim-regional">Repository</a>, this capsule also includes the dataset and neural network weights to train and apply the surrogate models.</p> <p>The <strong>dataset</strong> for training and evaluation can be found at <em>data/nextsim</em>, which includes three different Zarr folders for training/validation/testing. The dataset is based on neXtSIM simulation data and ERA5 forcing data and extracted from the <a href="https://ige-meom-opendap.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/thredds/catalog/meomopendap/extract/catalog.html">SASIP shared data OpenDAP server</a>:</p> <ul> <li>The neXtSIM simulations were performed by Gauillaume Boutin and published in the paper "<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-617-2023">Arctic sea ice mass balance in a new coupled ice–ocean model using a brittle rheology framework</a>" (Boutin et al., 2023) and available as Zenodo <a href="../records/7277523">dataset</a> (Boutin et al., 2022).</li> <li>The forcing data is based on the ERA5 reanalysis dataset published in the paper: "<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803">The ERA5 global reanalysis</a>" (Hersbach et al., 2020) and available as dataset from the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S, Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2023). The here used forcing data is based on the <a href="https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels">hourly reanalysis data on single levels</a> and interpolated with nearest neighbors to the curvilinear grid as used in the output from the neXtSIM simulations. <strong>Disclaimer:</strong> The results contain modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information, 2023. Neither the European Commission nor ECMWF is responsible for any use that may be made of the Copernicus information or data it contains.</li> </ul> <p>The <strong>neural network weights</strong> are included under <em>data/models </em>and split into weights for the deterministic models and the diffusion models.<br>These neural network weights have been used to generate the results presented in the paper.</p> <p>In this capsule, the <em>notebooks</em> folder includes also the figures used within the paper and additional trajectory data used in the qualitative analysis of the paper.</p> <p>Generally, we recommend to just download the <em>data.tar.gz </em>file and use otherwise the original <a href="https://github.com/cerea-daml/diffusion-nextsim-regional">Repository</a>, since the here included code can be outdated. We further refer to the repository for additional information.</p> <p> </p> <p>Contained in this capsule:</p> <ul> <li>configs.tar.gz: The configuration files for the experiments.</li> <li>data.tar.gz: The dataset and neural network weights.</li> <li>diffusion_nextsim.tar.gz: The main code for the neural network etc.</li> <li>environment.yaml: The anaconda environment file, can be used to install the needed packages.</li> <li>notebooks.tar.gz: The notebooks that were used to create the figures in the paper. The figures from the paper and the data from the qualitative analysis are included as well.</li> <li>readme.md: The readme file from the repository.</li> <li>scripts.tar.gz: The scripts used for the experiments.</li> <li>setup.py: the file to install the <em>diffusion_nextsim</em> package in a python environment.</li> </ul> <p>References:</p> <p>Guillaume Boutin, Heather Regan, Einar Ólason, Laurent Brodeau, Claude Talandier, Camille Lique, & Pierre Rampal. (2022). Data accompanying the article "Arctic sea ice mass balance in a new coupled ice-ocean model using a brittle rheology framework" (1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7277523</p> <p>Boutin, G., Ólason, E., Rampal, P., Regan, H., Lique, C., Talandier, C., Brodeau, L., and Ricker, R.: Arctic sea ice mass balance in a new coupled ice–ocean model using a brittle rheology framework, The Cryosphere, 17, 617–638, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-617-2023, 2023.</p> <p>Copernicus Climate Change Service (2023): ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</a>.</p> <p>Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. <em>Q J R Meteorol Soc</em>. 2020; 146: 1999–2049. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a></p> <p> </p><p>This research has received financial support from the project SASIP (grant no. 353) funded by Schmidt Science – a philanthropic initiative that seeks to improve societal outcomes through the development of emerging science and technologies.</p&gt

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore