1,720,983 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Kinship and behavior in primates [Bernard Chapais, Carol M. Berman (Eds.)]
No full textScientists would probably agree that kinship is a fundamental factor shaping the behaviour and ecology of primate as well as of other animal species. The number of studies analysing the importance of kinship for primates is growing, and data are now available for many species. Our knowledge on this topic is, however, still fragmentary. Indeed, no single book has ever been published on kinship in primates. Chapais & Berman therefore aim to analyse this kinship ‘black box’, as they define it, by reviewing and critically discussing the most recent findings on the link between kinship and behaviour in primates.The editors state that studies on this subject have generally used simple dual classifications to analyse kinship (e.g. kin and nonkin, same and different matrilines). Such criteria are arbitrary and limit comparisons across species and/or studies; for example, some scientists may consider as kin those individuals who share a coefficient of relatedness of r ? 0.25, while for others the cut-off may be r ? 0.125. Both the possibility and feasibility of measuring the coefficient of relatedness between animals have improved in recent years with the rapid development of new molecular techniques. The first section of the book thus focuses on methodological improvements in determining kin relationships, with special reference to wild populations. This section clearly reviews current methodologies and discusses their efficacy (useful for those of us who use kinship data for behaviour research without understanding the methods required to get them). However, I was a bit disappointed to read, in the chapter by Morin & Goldberg, that ‘No genetic study of primate kinship has yet, in the absence of external data, been able to resolve relatedness on a finer scale (e.g., half versus full sibs…)’ (page 34). This sentence supports Chapais & Berman's position that many facets of primate kinship have yet to be understood. However, I had hoped to find a discussion of new findings and techniques to help explain the importance of genetic relationships to primate behaviour, particularly after Chapais & Berman's statement about the inaccuracy of previous studies on this topic.The second section focuses on ecology and demography. Isbell highlights how female dispersal patterns (whether elicited or not by mothers) may affect the size and presence of female kin groups. Hoelzer and colleagues discuss the relation between dispersal and population genetics and review various models used in biogeography, two relevant topics in light of the many endangered species of primates. Finally, Hill analyses kinship in Cercopithecines, probably the most studied primate taxon with respect to both kinship and behaviour.The next two sections review current evidence about what are probably the classic topics on the link between kinship and behaviour, the importance of maternal kinship on primate behaviour and the effect of kinship on mating. I particularly appreciated that an entire chapter (by Nash) is devoted to nocturnal primates, even though the data on kinship in these species are still scarce, as Nash herself acknowledges. However, this decision seems warranted, in that a book with a relatively narrow topic (although with many implications) should expand the reader's views and knowledge about research areas or species that do not otherwise receive much attention. The chapter on kin recognition is well written and welcome. This topic is attracting growing attention from behavioural ecologists and psychologists, and the importance of the various mechanisms for kin recognition (e.g. spatial proximity or visual recognition) is likely to be debated for years to come.The last section analyses the implications of studies on nonhuman primates for understanding kinship in humans. The authors effectively discuss how primatology and social anthropology (as well as, in my view, many other disciplines) share many theoretical concepts (although not always explicitly) and benefit from a mutual exchange of ideas.I have only a couple of minor criticisms. The first one, to the editors, concerns the absence of a chapter on the importance of kinship for non-primate species. Some data appear sporadically throughout the book, but a dedicated chapter would have attracted more readers who are not primate specialists. The second criticism, to the publisher, is that I found the book quite hard to read because of the small font size.In conclusion, I enjoyed this book. Berman & Chapais have succeeded in assembling some of the major experts on kinship in primates. In the last few years, the proliferation of edited books on primates, and their usually high cost, sometimes reduces their effective need and originality, which in turn forces potential readers, particularly students, to have to choose which book to buy. This problem, however, does not apply to this book, because a summary of the importance of kinship for primate behavioural ecology has been needed, and the book covers the major areas of research in this field. The book is clear and well written and would benefit upper-level undergraduate and postgraduate students as well as scientists in primatology, behavioural ecology and anthropology.Review of Kinship and Behavior in Primates, Bernard Chapais, Carol M. Berman (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004),</p
Kinship and behavior in primates [Bernard Chapais, Carol M. Berman (Eds.)]
No full textScientists would probably agree that kinship is a fundamental factor shaping the behaviour and ecology of primate as well as of other animal species. The number of studies analysing the importance of kinship for primates is growing, and data are now available for many species. Our knowledge on this topic is, however, still fragmentary. Indeed, no single book has ever been published on kinship in primates. Chapais & Berman therefore aim to analyse this kinship ‘black box’, as they define it, by reviewing and critically discussing the most recent findings on the link between kinship and behaviour in primates.The editors state that studies on this subject have generally used simple dual classifications to analyse kinship (e.g. kin and nonkin, same and different matrilines). Such criteria are arbitrary and limit comparisons across species and/or studies; for example, some scientists may consider as kin those individuals who share a coefficient of relatedness of r ? 0.25, while for others the cut-off may be r ? 0.125. Both the possibility and feasibility of measuring the coefficient of relatedness between animals have improved in recent years with the rapid development of new molecular techniques. The first section of the book thus focuses on methodological improvements in determining kin relationships, with special reference to wild populations. This section clearly reviews current methodologies and discusses their efficacy (useful for those of us who use kinship data for behaviour research without understanding the methods required to get them). However, I was a bit disappointed to read, in the chapter by Morin & Goldberg, that ‘No genetic study of primate kinship has yet, in the absence of external data, been able to resolve relatedness on a finer scale (e.g., half versus full sibs…)’ (page 34). This sentence supports Chapais & Berman's position that many facets of primate kinship have yet to be understood. However, I had hoped to find a discussion of new findings and techniques to help explain the importance of genetic relationships to primate behaviour, particularly after Chapais & Berman's statement about the inaccuracy of previous studies on this topic.The second section focuses on ecology and demography. Isbell highlights how female dispersal patterns (whether elicited or not by mothers) may affect the size and presence of female kin groups. Hoelzer and colleagues discuss the relation between dispersal and population genetics and review various models used in biogeography, two relevant topics in light of the many endangered species of primates. Finally, Hill analyses kinship in Cercopithecines, probably the most studied primate taxon with respect to both kinship and behaviour.The next two sections review current evidence about what are probably the classic topics on the link between kinship and behaviour, the importance of maternal kinship on primate behaviour and the effect of kinship on mating. I particularly appreciated that an entire chapter (by Nash) is devoted to nocturnal primates, even though the data on kinship in these species are still scarce, as Nash herself acknowledges. However, this decision seems warranted, in that a book with a relatively narrow topic (although with many implications) should expand the reader's views and knowledge about research areas or species that do not otherwise receive much attention. The chapter on kin recognition is well written and welcome. This topic is attracting growing attention from behavioural ecologists and psychologists, and the importance of the various mechanisms for kin recognition (e.g. spatial proximity or visual recognition) is likely to be debated for years to come.The last section analyses the implications of studies on nonhuman primates for understanding kinship in humans. The authors effectively discuss how primatology and social anthropology (as well as, in my view, many other disciplines) share many theoretical concepts (although not always explicitly) and benefit from a mutual exchange of ideas.I have only a couple of minor criticisms. The first one, to the editors, concerns the absence of a chapter on the importance of kinship for non-primate species. Some data appear sporadically throughout the book, but a dedicated chapter would have attracted more readers who are not primate specialists. The second criticism, to the publisher, is that I found the book quite hard to read because of the small font size.In conclusion, I enjoyed this book. Berman & Chapais have succeeded in assembling some of the major experts on kinship in primates. In the last few years, the proliferation of edited books on primates, and their usually high cost, sometimes reduces their effective need and originality, which in turn forces potential readers, particularly students, to have to choose which book to buy. This problem, however, does not apply to this book, because a summary of the importance of kinship for primate behavioural ecology has been needed, and the book covers the major areas of research in this field. The book is clear and well written and would benefit upper-level undergraduate and postgraduate students as well as scientists in primatology, behavioural ecology and anthropology.Review of Kinship and Behavior in Primates, Bernard Chapais, Carol M. Berman (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004),</p
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
