1,721,756 research outputs found

    Carta de Carlos Maria Jaumandreu Miguel

    No full text
    Carta de Carlos Maria Jaumeandreu sobre la censura de l'Obra La Casada Infiel

    1 ° Rapport de M. Carlos Maria Lascario

    No full text
    1 ° Rapport de M. Carlos Maria Lascario. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 5 N°2, Avril-juin 1953. pp. 309-315

    1 ° Rapport de M. Carlos Maria Lascario

    No full text
    1 ° Rapport de M. Carlos Maria Lascario. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé. Vol. 5 N°2, Avril-juin 1953. pp. 309-315

    CARLOS MARIA DE ARAÚJO: "Eu sou poeta por acaso"

    Full text link
    Carlos Maria de Araújo (1921-1962) é um poeta injustamente esquecido, tan­to em Portugal quanto no Brasil

    Two letters from Jose Antonio Romero to Carlos Maria de Bustamante (Guadalajara), 1836

    No full text
    Spanish Language Manuscripts: Two letters from Jose Antonio Romero to Carlos Maria de Bustamante (Guadalajara), 1836

    [Letter from Lorenzo de Zavala to Carlos Maria Bustamante, March 24, 1829]

    No full text
    Lorenzo de Zavala to Carlos Maria Bustamante: Defending himself against charges made by Bustamante, including that he embezzled six hundred-thousand pesos. T(lalpam), March 24, 1829

    Autograaf

    Full text link
    Carlos Maria Isidoro don, 1788-1855, pretendent Hispaania troonileMaria Teresa, Hispaania infantaÜmbrik aadressiga Maria Teresa`l

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore