4 research outputs found
Relationship between the neonatal white blood cell count and histologic chorioamnionitis in preterm newborns.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine the relationship between neonatal white blood cell (WBC) count and the diagnosis of histologic chorioamnionitis (HCA).
DESIGN: We measured WBC, a widely used marker of inflammation, to evaluate whether the values at birth were associated with HCA. Setting: NICU, Department of Pediatrics of Padua University, Padua, Italy.
SUBJECTS: WBC count was evaluated in 71 preterm neonates (<32 weeks of gestation) with HCA and in a control group without HCA on day 1, 3, and 6 after delivery. Logistic regression analysis and diagnostic accuracy analysis were used to assess the association between WBC counts and HCA.
MAIN RESULTS: WBC levels were significantly higher in infants with HCA than in those without HCA (Median IQR, WBC (x10(9)/l): day 1, 13.2 (6.2-21.8) vs 8.1 (6-11.4), p < 0.001; day 3, 17.4 (11.4-26.9) vs 6.3 (5.2-8.3), p < 0.001; day 6, 18.4 (11.1-31) vs 6.5 (4.4-9), p < 0.0001). The neonatal WBC count on the third day of life was the most sensitive parameter associated with HCA (sensitivity: 0.80; specificity: 0.88). The cut-off value based on the ROC curve was 10 (x10(9)/l).
CONCLUSIONS: WBC count in the third day of life is strongly associated with HCA
Relationship between the neonatal white blood cell count and histologic chorioamnionitis in preterm newborns.
Objective: The aim was to examine the relationship between neonatal white blood cell (WBC) count and the diagnosis of histologic chorioamnionitis (HCA). Design: We measured WBC, a widely used marker of inflammation, to evaluate whether the values at birth were associated with HCA. Setting: NICU, Department of Pediatrics of Padua University, Padua, Italy. Subjects: WBC count was evaluated in 71 preterm neonates (< 32 weeks of gestation) with HCA and in a control group without HCA on day 1, 3, and 6 after delivery. Logistic regression analysis and diagnostic accuracy analysis were used to assess the association between WBC counts and HCA. Main results: WBC levels were significantly higher in infants with HCA than in those without HCA (Median IQR, WBC (x10(9)/l): day 1, 13.2 (6.2-21.8) vs 8.1 (6-11.4), p < 0.001; day 3, 17.4 (11.4-26.9) vs 6.3 (5.2-8.3), p < 0.001; day 6, 18.4 (11.1-31) vs 6.5 (4.4-9), p < 0.0001). The neonatal WBC count on the third day of life was the most sensitive parameter associated with HCA (sensitivity: 0.80; specificity: 0.88). The cut-off value based on the ROC curve was 10 (x10(9)/l). Conclusions: WBC count in the third day of life is strongly associated with HCA
Fetal placental inflammation is associated with poor neonatal growth of preterm infants: a case-control study.
Abstract Objective: To determine whether there is an association between histological chorioamnionitis (HCA) and postnatal growth of preterm infants in the neonatal period. Method: This case-control study is part of a larger prospective histological study on placentas performed in all deliveries prior to 32 weeks of gestation. Eligible cases involved all placentas with a diagnosis of HCA. Control subjects were those without HCA, matched 1:1 with case subjects according to gestational age (±1 week). Placental inflammatory status and serial weight gain were analyzed for all infants during the first four postnatal weeks. Based on placental inflammation extension, HCA was defined as maternal HCA (MHCA) or fetal HCA (FHCA). Results: Of the 320 mother-infant pairs, 71 (22.1%) presented with HCA (27 MHCA and 44 FHCA). Decreases in weight gain at 21 and 28 days were associated with the presence of FHCA (β coefficient ± SE = -4.40 ± 2.21, p = 0.05 and -6.92 ± 2.96, p = 0.02, respectively), whereas no significant differences were found between MHCA and no-HCA groups. FHCA and MHCA were not identified as risk factors of weekly weight gain, after adjusting for possible confounders (maternal ethnicity, parity, smoking during pregnancy, infant gender, IUGR status, SGA status, antenatal steroids, total fluid intake, late-onset sepsis, BPD). Conclusions: We found an association between fetal placental inflammation and poor neonatal growth but we were not able to identify a specific week wherein weight gain could be mostly affected. Placental findings may be used to identify preterm infants at risk of postnatal growth failure
The Application of the Public Order Clause on the Financial Market as One of the Elements for Building Sustainable Finance in a Comparative Perspective
The public order clause is an instrument of private international law that limits the possibility of applying the law of a designated country in cross-border contractual relations. The role of the clause
is to protect the specific interests and values of a given legal order, the importance of which is so significant that it justifies refusing to apply foreign law or limiting the scope of its application. From the
point of view of the subject of this study, the public order clause could potentially be applied by national supervisory authorities in a situation of a threat to the security and stability of a given financial market.
Thus the purpose of this article, in which the author uses the functional approach of the comparative legal method, the historical-descriptive method and the dogmatic method, is to verify the thesis about the possible use of the public order clause as an instrument supporting the process of building sustainable finance, along with its limitations in the form of the French concept of effet atténué and also from a comparative and cross-border [email protected] of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, PolandAct of 4 February 2011 on Private International Law (consolidated text of 2015, item 1792, as amended).Bagan-Kurluta, K. (2017). Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe. C. H. Beck.Causse, H. (2015). Droit bancaire et financier. Marre & Martin.Cvetkova, I. (2021). The abolition of the concept of ‘causa’ in French civil law. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 26(5), 91–102.Dziawgo, D. (2019). Sustainable finance as a new financial investment model. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 12(63), 23–34.Dziawgo, L. (2013). Rynek ekologicznych funduszy inwestycyjnych w obszarze G-A-S-L. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 311, 64–84.Foyer, J. (2005). Remarques sur l’évolution de l’exception d’ordre public international depuis la thèse de Paul Lagarde. In M.-N. Jobard-Bachellier & P. Mayer (Eds.), Le droit international privé: esprit et méthodes (pp. 285–297). Dalloz.Glicz, M. (2022). Wybrane zagadnienia kolizyjnoprawne funkcjonowania międzynarodowych systemów transakcyjnych & rozliczeniowych. Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, 1(53), 56–66.Hammje, P. (1999). L’effet atténué de l’ordre public. In E. Wyler & A. Papaux (Eds.), L’extranéité ou le dépassement de l’ordre juridique étatique (pp. 87–97). Pédone.Judgment of the CJEU of 16 June 2015 on the case of Diageo Brands BV v. Simiramida-04 EOOD, C-681/13.Judgment of the CJEU of 25 May 2016 on the case of Rūdolfs Meroni v. Recoletos Limited, C-559/14.Judgment of the French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) of 1 December 2010, file ref. 1re Civ., 1er décembre 2010, pourvoi no 09–13.303, Bull. 2010, I, no 248.Judgment of the French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) of 17 April 1953 on the case of Rivière, file ref. Cass. Civ. I.181 J.C.P. 1953.Judgment of the French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) of 28 January 2009, file ref. 1re Civ., 28 janvier 2009, pourvoi no 07–11.729, Bull. 2009, I, no 15.Judgment of the French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) of 7 November 2012, file ref. 1re Civ., 7 novembre 2012, pourvoi no 11–23.871, Bull. 2012, I, no 228.Judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 11 October 1969, file ref. & CR 240/69.Judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 2 June 1980, file ref. II CR 174/80.Judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 20 January 1983, file ref. III CZP37/82.Jurkowska-Zeidler, A. (2010). Integracja systemów gwarancyjnych na jednolitym rynku finansowym Unii Europejskiej w ramach sieci bezpieczeństwa finansowego. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 105, 95–101.Kosikowski, C., & Olszak, M. (2010). Od prawa bankowego do prawa rynku finansowego. In J. Głuchowski (Ed.), System prawa finansowego. Prawo walutowe. Prawo dewizowe. Prawo rynku finansowego (pp. 195–250). Wolters Kluwer.Kubuj, K. (2022). The role of general clause of (public) morals based on selected European Court of Human Rights’ judgments. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 27(4), 101–119.Legrand, V. (2020). Droit international privé. Ellipses.Lemonnier, M., & Mariański, M. (2017). Podstawowe założenia & cele reformy francuskiego kodeksu cywilnego z 2016 roku. In E. Pływaczewski & J. Bryk (Eds.), Meandry prawa – teoria & praktyka. Księga jubileuszowa prof. M. Goettela. (pp. 295–304). WSPOL.Lijowska, M. (2006). Klauzula porządku publicznego jako instrument kolizyjnoprawnej ochrony konsumenta. Kwartalnik prawa prywatnego, 3(15), 699–734.Ludwiczak, W. (1990). Międzynarodowe prawo prywatne. PWN.Mariański, M. (2020). Problematyka regulacji rynku finansowego w ujęciu transgranicznym. Analiza na przykładzie prawa polskiego & prawa francuskiego. Wydawnictwo UWM.Mariański, M. (2023). Le phénomène de régulation indirecte comme l’un des éléments clés influençant la formation de la spécificité du marché financier modern. Studia Prawnoustrojowe, 2(60), 265–277.Nieborak, T. (2010). Globalny kryzys finansowy – istota, przyczyny, konsekwencje. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny & Socjologiczny, 4, 95–106.Nieborak, T. (2021). Human rights in the light of the process of financialisation. Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 26(5), 161–185.Pazdan, M. (2001). Prawo prywatne międzynarodowe. Wolters Kluwer.Pazdan, M. (2011). Nowa polska ustawa o prawie prywatnym międzynarodowym. Państwo & Prawo, 6, 18–29.Poillot-Peruzzetto, S. (2009). Ordre public et lois de police dans les textes de référence. In M. Fallon, P. Lagarde, & S. Poillot-Peruzzetto (Eds.), La matière civile et commerciale, socle d’un code européen de droit international privé? (pp. 80–101). LGDJ.Przyśliwska, E. (2017). Kolizyjna & procesowa klauzula porządku publicznego. Metryka, 1, 69–84.Redor, J. (2001). L’ordre public: ordre public ou ordres publics? Ordre public et droits fondamentaux. Bruyland.Regulation (EC) 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome I) (O. J. L 177, 04.07.2008).Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the Establishment of a Framework to Facilitate Sustainable Investment, and Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (O. J. L 198, 22.06.2020).Regulation of 27 October 1933 of the President of the Republic of Poland – Code of Obligations (consolidated text of 1933 No. 82, item 598, as amended).Rogowski, W., & Lipski, M. (2022). Znaczenie informacji niefinansowej w świetle wymogów zrównoważonego rozwoju oraz turbulentnego otoczenia. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 2(64), 33–44.Szostek, D. (2021). Is the traditional method of regulation (the legislative act) sufficient to regulate artificial intelligence, or should it also be regulated by an algorithmic code? Białostockie Studia Prawnicze, 26(3), 43–60.Szpunar, M. (2022). Maciej Zachariasiewicz, Klauzula porządku publicznego jako instrument ochrony materialnoprawnych interesów & wartości fori, Warszawa 2018, ss. 492 (recenzja). Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, 1(53), 211–215.Szymczak, I. (2014). Metoda nauki o porównywaniu systemów prawnych. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny & Socjologiczny, 76(3), 37–49.Terré, F. (1996). Rapport introductif. In T. Revet (Ed.), L’ordre public à la fin du XXème siècle (pp. 2–10). Dalloz.Tokarczyk, R. (2008). Komparatystyka prawnicza. Wolters Kluwer.Valette, J.-P. (2013). Régulation des marchés financiers. Ellipses.Zachariasiewicz, M. (2018). Klauzula porządku publicznego jako instrument ochrony materialnoprawnych interesów & wartości fori. C. H. Beck.Zajdler, M. (2013). Kryzys na rynkach finansowych & jego skutki dla płynności polskiego sektora bankowego w latach 2007–2010. Bezpieczny Bank, 2–3, 28–29.Ziemblicki, B. (2014). Klauzula porządku publicznego ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem instytucji punitive damages. In A. Bator, J. Helios, & W. Jedlecka (Eds.), Rządy Prawa & europejska kultura prawna (pp. 97–108). Wydział Prawa, Administracji & Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.29116117
