1,720,984 research outputs found
Diagnostic tests based on gene expression profile in breast cancer: from background to clinical use
No full textBreast cancer is a complex disease with heterogeneous presentation and clinical course. The last decade has witnessed the development, commercialization, and increasing use of multigene assays, designed to support physicians and patients in clinical decision making in early-stage breast cancer. These include Oncotype DX®, MammaPrint®, and ProsignaTM assays. The assays differ in the technological platforms used for assessment of gene expression, in the number of genes and in the specific genes that are being tested, in the patient populations used for their development and validation, and in their clinical utility. This review focuses on these three commercialized assays, their development, validation, and clinical utility. The review also addresses ongoing prospective trials investigating these assays and health-economic considerations relating to their us
No Advantage in Survival With Targeted Therapies as Maintenance in Patients With Limited and Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Literature-Based Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
No full textSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a lethal disease with a very restricted armamentarium of active treatments. In the new era of targeted therapies, several attempts based on the combination of chemotherapy with new compounds has been made but with a low rate of success. The idea of using the new targeted therapies as maintenance treatment after their combination with chemotherapy has been pursued. The aim of the present study was to analyze the available clinical data regarding the effect of the targeted agents as maintenance therapy on survival in patients with SCLC. A literature-based meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, in accordance with the preferences for reported items in systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, was performed. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and a search of abstracts presented at American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Nine studies, with a total of 1385 patients, were included. The pooled analysis revealed that the new targeted therapies did not improve survival compared with the control arm (placebo, hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.15; P = .69). However, a small advantage in the 1-year OS rate (risk ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-1.63; P = .21) was observed. Maintenance with targeted therapies failed to improve the survival of patients with SCLC with an increased rate of toxicity. The detected survival advantage suggests that perhaps the maintenance approach could be used to increase the 1-year OS rate. However, this finding requires confirmation in further studies, perhaps of patients selected according to their tumor biologic profil
Incidence and relative risk of adverse events of special interest in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer treated with CYP-17 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of published trials
No full textAbiraterone acetate and orteronel are two CYP-17 inhibitors that have been studied in prostate cancer. They have shown relevant toxicities, including fluid retention/oedema, hypokalaemia, hypertension, liver function test abnormalities and cardiac events. The goal of this study was to determine the risk of special adverse events related to CYP- 17 inhibitor in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRCP). Summary data from four randomized phase III trials comparing CYP-17 inhibitors and prednisone versus placebo and prednisone in metastatic CRCP patients were meta-analysed. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) for the risk of all-grade and grade 3-4 adverse events of special interest were calculated. Data from 4916 patients (2849 in the AA experimental arm; 2067 in the control arm) were analysed. The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was never more than 10% of the patients. However, compared with placebo, the CYP-17 inhibitor significantly increased the all-grade events of hypertension (RR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.3-1.8; p < 0.00001), hypokalaemia (RR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.29-1.89; p < 0.00001), cardiac disorders (RR = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.27-1.7; p < 0.00001) liver function test abnormalities (RR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.15-3.24; p = 0.01) grade ≥ 3 adverse events, hypokalaemia (RR = 4.23; 95% CI = 1.28-13.99; p = 0.02) and cardiac disorders (RR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.18-2.05; p = 0.002). A lot of adverse events such as hypertension, hypokalaemia, cardiac disorders and liver function test abnormalities are increased during CYP-17 inhibitor based therapy. Strict monitoring of these side effects should be considered during CYP- 17 inhibitor therapy in prostate cancer patients
Low-Dose Oral Ethinylestradiol With Concomitant Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid for Advanced Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Full text linkBACKGROUND:
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of low-dose oral ethinylestradiol (EE) and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue with concomitant low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) as a thromboprophylactic agent for advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
The patients received an EE dose of 150 μg daily (50 μg 3 times daily) and an ASA dose of 100 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen response.
RESULTS:
A total of 32 patients were enrolled. A PSA response was observed in 19 patients (59.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-76%). The median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.5-14.1 months). The treatment was generally well tolerated and no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. Only 1 patient interrupted EE because of a cardiac event and 1 patient experienced grade 2 nausea and vomiting. No major bleeding occurred.
CONCLUSION:
Low-dose EE with concomitant low-dose ASA is safe, showing potential activity in patients with advanced CRPC, and should be investigated furthe
New molecular therapies in patients with advanced Hepatocellular Cancer in second line of treatment: Is a real defeat?: Results from a literature based meta-analysis of randomized trials
No full textSeveral new biological agents have been investigated as second line of treatment in advanced Hepatocellular Cancer (HCC). We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effect of targeted therapies in advanced HCC patients beyond the first line of treatment. A literature-based metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials was undertaken. The primary outcome was the overall survival. The secondary endpoints were the progression-free survival (PFS), the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) and the safety. Pooled analysis of targeted agents revealed a modest increase in overall survival compared with control arm (Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.93, 95%CI: 0.83-1.04; P=0.21). On the counterpart, all the secondary endpoints were in favoured to the targeted agents-based treatment (PFS: HR=0.68, 95% CI:0.56-0.83; P=0.0002; RR: 3.50,95% CI 1.81-6.76; P=0.0002, DCR: RR:1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.32; P=0.002). To date, there is a clinical need of a more efficacious second line of therapy in treatment of the advanced HCC. This study showed some activity of the new targeted therapies in second line of treatment in advanced HC
RNA disruption and drug response in breast cancer primary systemic therapy
No full textBACKGROUND:
As there is now evidence that switching clinical nonresponders early in primary systemic therapy to alternate treatment regimens can enhance survival in some breast cancer patients, the need for a robust intermediate endpoint that can guide treatment response across all tumor subtypes is urgent. Recently, chemotherapy drugs have been shown to induce a decrease in RNA quality in tumor cells from breast cancer biopsies in some patients at midtherapy, and that this has been associated with subsequent achievement of pathological complete response (pCR). The decrease in RNA quality has been shown to be associated with RNA disruption; aberrant RNA bands visualized by RNA electrophoresis have been associated with subsequent tumor cell death. The objectives of these studies are to show that a new assay based on induction of RNA disruption in tumor cells by chemotherapy can stratify at midtherapy, pCR responders from non-pCR responders irrespective of clinical response and to present early evidence that clinically useful RNA disruption can be detected as early as 14 days after initiation of treatment.
METHODS:
RNA disruption in tumor cells was quantified by analysis of the RNA electrophoresis banding pattern and expressed as an RNA disruption index (RDI). To develop the RNA disruption assay (RDA), RDI was correlated with clinical outcome (pCR) from the NCIC-CTG MA.22 breast cancer clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00066443). RDA Zones were established by stratifying patients using RDI values into Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3. Zone 3 included seven out of eight pCR responders, whereas Zone 1 contained no pCR responders. An intermediate zone (Zone 2) was established which contained one pCR. Subsequently, to determine early drug response, RNA disruption was examined by RDI after 14 days exposure to trastuzumab, zoledronic acid, or letrozole + cyclophosphamide ± sorafenib therapy.
RESULTS:
In MA.22, RDA stratified 23 of 85 patients in Zone 1 as pCR nonresponders, 24 patients in Zone 2, an intermediate zone, and 38 patients in Zone 3, pCR responders and non-pCR patients who share RDI comparable to those achieving pCR. In the early response studies, after 14 days exposure to chemotherapy, some RNA disruption as measured by RDI elevation could be detected in 3/12 trastuzumab, 7/15 zoledronic acid, 5/29 letrozole + cyclophosphamide, and 5/23 letrozole + cyclophosphamide + sorafenib patients.
CONCLUSIONS:
RDA is a novel intermediate endpoint that has promise for clinical utility for breast cancers early in response-guided primary systemic therapy
Circulating tumor cells correlate with patterns of recurrence in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Full text linkThe aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and patterns of recurrence in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The study involved patients with histologically confirmed, advanced prostatic adenocarcinoma, who were tested for CTCs (Veridex®) when they developed recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation between 2008 and 2014. Forty-two prostate cancer patients were evaluated. CTCs were detected in 14 out of 42 (33.3%) patients (Group A), while the remaining 28 (66.7%) showed undetectable levels of CTCs (Group B). The mean prostate-specific antigen value was higher in Group A in comparison to Group B (6.2 vs 3.3 ng/dL) (P=0.48). Presence of bone metastases alone or along with nodal metastases was more common in Group A (57.1%) in comparison to Group B (25%) (P=0.04). In a univariate analysis, the presence of CTCs at diagnosis correlated with the development of bone recurrence (OR: 4; 95% CI: 1.0–15.9; P=0.05). Even if the study enrolled only a small number of patients, the detection of CTCs in the blood appears to correlate with the pattern of progression in patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, suggesting a possible role in anticipating recurrence at the bone in men with higher tumor load. Further prospective studies are warranted in this setting
Would the combination of everolimus with endocrine-therapy help in FGFR2 positive serous endometrial cancer?
Full text linkN/
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
