1,720,960 research outputs found
Bimodal ECG-PCG Cardiovascular Disease Detection: a Close Look at Transfer Learning and Data Collection Issues
Early detection of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is crucial for minimizing their adverse impact on patients' health. Electrocardiograms (ECGs), which capture the heart's electrical activity, have been widely used to primarily evaluate heart conduction disorders. On the other hand, phonocardiograms (PCGs) recorded during cardiac auscultation, have been less explored, often being overlooked in favor of echocardiograms for detecting mechanical issues such as valvular diseases. However, due to their low cost and non-invasive nature, the analysis of both ECGs and PCGs can be easily integrated into preventive settings. Combining effectively the complementary information from these two modalities could significantly enhance the early detection of CVDs, where Machine Learning (ML) techniques can offer promising and cost-effective solutions. Progress in this area, however, has been limited by the lack of large enough datasets containing both ECG and PCG signals. One objective of this work is to analyze in-depth prior bimodal CVD detection research, identifying key issues to better address data collection and transfer learning limitations. We also propose a different approach to transfer learning for improving heart sound interpretation. Our findings confirm the effectiveness of using both signals to detect abnormal heart conditions. However, we also notice that even a refined transfer learning approach to enhance PCG interpretation is not enough to fully address the issues coming from the lack of bimodal data, indicating the need for further efforts in this direction. Ultimately, our bimodal approach achieved an overall AUROC of 96.4%, exceeding the performance of corresponding ECG-only and PCG-only models by approximately 3% and 10%, respectively. Compared to the other existing approaches, our method demonstrated superior AUROC performance while maintaining a relatively low false-negative rate, which is critical in CVD screening contexts
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
