1,721,027 research outputs found
Analisis mimpi dalam perspektif Ibnu Qutaibah dan Calvin S. Hall
INDONESIA :
Mimpi selalu menarik untuk dibahas dalam berbagai sudut pandang karena masing masing individu mempunyai perbedaan dalam menyikapi mimpinya. Mimpi juga tak luput dalam pembahasan dari sudut pandang psikologi dan keislaman. Ibnu Qutaibah dalam kitab Ta’bir Ar-Ru’ya meinterpretasi sebuah mimpi dengan metode yang cukup beragam dan luas menggunakan sumber keislaman. sedangkan mimpi sendiri digambarkan oleh Calvin sebagai proyeksi dari konsepsi seseorang.
Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif. dengan jenis penelitian penelitian kepustakaan karena data – data atau bahan yang diperlukan berupa buku – buku, jurnal, ensiklopedia. Batasan untuk mimpi yang perlu diinterpretasi menurut Ibnu Qutaibah yaitu mimpi yang memuat kebenaran dalam isinya. Sedangkan batasan untuk Calvin adalah beberapa mimpi yang membentuk rangkaian gambaran mimpi. analisis data dalam penelitian ini yaitu pendekatan analisis isi.
Ibnu Qutaibah menjelaskan mimpi terbagi menjadi mimpi yang berisi kebenaran dan mimpi yang berisi kekalutan. metode analisis mimpi Ibnu Qutaibah menggunakan analisis lafadz, makna lafadz, kebalikan lafadz, Al-Qur''an, Hadits, dan syair. Metode analisis Calvin menggunakan teori simbolisasi mimpi untuk menghasilkan gambaran konsepsi seseorang. konsepsi tersebut yaitu konsep diri, konsep orang lain, konsep dunia, konsep impuls, larangan, konsep masalah dan konflik.
Terdapat perbedaan dan persamaan dalam analisis mimpi Ibnu Qutaibah dan Calvin S. Hall. perbedaan itu mencakup konsep mimpi, jenis mimpi, fokus interpretasi, sedangkan persamaannya adalah sumber mimpi, metode analisis, konsep simbolisasi. dari masing-masing sudut pandang memunculkan titik temu integrasi. integrasi yang dimaksud yaitu dengan cara penyatuan metode melalui teori simbolisasi dan analogi.
ENGLISH :
Dreams are always interesting to discuss from various points of view because each individual has differences in responding to their dreams. dreams are also included in the discussion from the point of view of psychology and Islam. Ibn Qutaibah in the book Ta'bir Ar-Ru'ya interprets a dream with a fairly diverse and extensive method using Islamic sources. and dreams are described by Calvin as projections of one's conception.
This study used qualitative research methods. the type of research is library research because the data or materials needed are in the form of books, journals, encyclopedias. According to Ibn Qutaibah, a dream that needs to be interpreted is a dream that contains the truth in its contents. Meanwhile, the limitation of research for Calvin is that several dreams form a series of dream images. The method of analysis in this research is the content analysis approach
Ibn Qutaibah explains that dreams are divided into dreams that contain truth and dreams that contain confusion. Ibn Qutaibah's dream analysis method uses lafadz analysis, the meaning of lafadz, the opposite of lafadz, the Qur'an, Hadith, and poetry. Calvin's analytical method uses the theory of dream symbolization to produce a picture of a person's conception. These conceptions are self-concept, other people's concept, world concept, impulse concept, prohibition, problem and conflict concept.
There are differences and similarities in the dream analysis of Ibn Qutaibah and Calvin S. Hall. the differences include the concept of dreams, types of dreams, the focus of interpretation, while the similarities are the source of the dream, the method of analysis, the concept of symbolization. from each point of view brings up the intersection point of integration. The integration is meant by unifying methods through the theory of symbolization and analogy.
ARABIC :
الأحلام دائما مثيرة للاهتمام للمناقشة من وجهات نظر مختلفة لأن كل فرد لديه اختلافات في الاستجابة لأحلامهم. كما أن الأحلام لا تفلت من النقاش من وجهة نظر علم النفس والإسلام. يفسر ابن قتيبة في كتابه تابير الرؤية الحلم بطريقة متنوعة وواسعة إلى حد ما باستخدام المصادر الإسلامية. بينما يصف كالفن الحلم نفسه بأنه إسقاط لمفهوم المرء
.
استخدمت هذه الدراسة طرق البحث النوعي. نوع البحث هو بحث المكتبة لأن البيانات أو المواد المطلوبة تكون في شكل كتب ومجلات وموسوعات. يرى ابن قتيبة أن الحلم الذي يحتاج إلى تفسير هو حلم يحتوي على الحقيقة في محتوياته. وفي الوقت نفسه ، فإن الحد الأقصى لكالفن هو عدد من الأحلام التي تشكل سلسلة من صور الأحلام. تحليل البيانات في هذه الدراسة هو نهج تحليل المحتوى
يوضح ابن قتيبة أن الأحلام تقسم إلى أحلام تحتوي على حقيقة وأحلام فيها ارتباك. تستخدم طريقة تحليل حلم ابن قتيبة تحليل لافادز ، ومعنى لافادز ، وعكس اللافادز ، والقرآن ، والحديث ، والشعر. تستخدم طريقة كالفن التحليلية نظرية ترميز الحلم لإنتاج صورة لمفهوم الشخص. هذه المفاهيم هي مفهوم الذات ، مفهوم الشخص الآخر ، مفهوم العالم ، مفهوم الاندفاع ، الحظر ، مفهوم المشكلة والصراع
.
توجد اختلافات وشبهات في تحليل الحلم لابن قتيبة وقاعة كالفن س. تشمل الاختلافات مفهوم الأحلام ، وأنواع الأحلام ، ومحور التفسير ، وأوجه الشبه هي مصدر الحلم ، وطريقة التحليل ، ومفهوم الترميز. من كل وجهة نظر تظهر نقطة تقاطع التكامل. يُقصد بالتكامل توحيد الأساليب من خلال نظرية الترميز وال
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Calvin S. Hall, approximately 1917
Lawyer, Hall & Cosgrove
PH Coll 512.3.25Formerly of the Benson and Hall law firm; later a Superior Court judge.To order a reproduction, inquire about permissions, or for information about prices see:
http://www.lib.washington.edu/specialcollections/services/reproduction/reproduction
Please cite the Order Numbe
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
