1,721,061 research outputs found
Supplement Series for the Journal of Religion & Society
No full textThe Contexts of Religion and Violence83-102
Creighton University Magazine Summer 2015
No full textWORLD TRAVELER RETURNS HOME
A well-traveled priest and scholar who is deeply committed to Creighton's Jesuit, Catholic mission, the Rev. Daniel Hendrickson, S.J., Ph.D., returns to Creighton to become the University's 25th president. Page 14.
BEEFING UP YOUR BRAIN
Internationally known for groundbreaking research that could improve treatment of epilepsy and other neurological disorders, Timothy Simeone, Ph.D., and Kristina Simeone, Ph.D., husband and wife faculty members in the School of Medicine, discuss the influence of diet and sleep on brain health. Page 22.
BRINGING CARE TO RURAL AMERICA
Health care in America continues to be an expansive industry, but fewer health care professionals are finding their way to the nation's rural areas, where a mounting crisis in access is underway. But some Creighton alumni from the schools of medicine, pharmacy and health professions, dentistry and nursing have come home or started anew in rural areas in need of their services. Page 26.
BLOODLAND: THE FIRST WORLD WAR'S LEGACY IN THE MIDDLE EAST
As the 100th anniversary of the outbreak of World War I is commemorated this year, history professor John Calvert, Ph.D., offers an insightful perspective on the war's profound impact on the Middle East, as the Ottoman Empire gave way to a Europeon colonial project that completely altered the region. Page 32.23
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
