1,721,001 research outputs found
Quantitative verification with adaptive uncertainty reduction
Full text linkStochastic models are widely used to verify whether systems satisfy their reliability, performance and other nonfunctional requirements. However, the validity of the verification depends on how accurately the parameters of these models can be estimated using data from component unit testing, monitoring, system logs, etc. When insufficient data are available, the models are affected by epistemic parametric uncertainty, the verification results are inaccurate, and any engineering decisions based on them may be invalid. To address these problems, we introduce VERACITY, a tool-supported iterative approach for the efficient and accurate verification of nonfunctional requirements under epistemic parameter uncertainty. VERACITY integrates confidence-interval quantitative verification with a new adaptive uncertainty reduction heuristic that collects additional data about the parameters of the verified model by unit-testing specific system components over a series of verification iterations. VERACITY supports the quantitative verification of discrete-time Markov chains, deciding which components are to be tested in each iteration based on factors that include the sensitivity of the model to variations in the parameters of different components, and the overheads (e.g., time or cost) of unit-testing each of these components. We show the effectiveness and efficiency of VERACITY by using it for the verification of the nonfunctional requirements of a tele-assistance service-based system and an online shopping web application
Understanding uncertainty in self-adaptive systems
Full text linkEnsuring that systems achieve their goals under uncertainty is a key driver for self-adaptation. Nevertheless, the concept of uncertainty in self-adaptive systems (SAS) is still insufficiently understood. Although several taxonomies of uncertainty have been proposed, taxonomies alone cannot convey the SAS research community's perception of uncertainty. To explore and to learn from this perception, we conducted a survey focused on the SAS ability to deal with unanticipated change and to model uncertainty, and on the major challenges that limit this ability. In this paper, we analyse the responses provided by the 51 participants in our survey. The insights gained from this analysis include the view - held by 71% of our participants - that SAS can be engineered to cope with unanticipated change, e.g., through evolving their actions, synthesising new actions, or using default actions to deal with such changes. To handle uncertainties that affect SAS models, the participants recommended the use of confidence intervals and probabilities for parametric uncertainty, and the use of multiple models with model averaging or selection for structural uncertainty. Notwithstanding this positive outlook, the provision of assurances for safety-critical SAS continues to pose major challenges according to our respondents. We detail these findings in the paper, in the hope that they will inspire valuable future research on self-adaptive systems
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
