1,721,018 research outputs found
Headache. Cluster headache treatment-RCTs versus real-world evidence
Recently published American Headache Society evidence-based guidelines for cluster headache management provide updated guidance on which therapies are superior to placebo in randomized controlled trials. These valuable recommendations do not always translate to real-world settings, however, and other criteria should be taken into account when attempting to treat cluster headache
How do you choose the appropriate migraine pharmacotherapy for an elderly person?
Migraine is ranked as the third most prevalent disorder, the eight
most burdensome disease and the seventh cause of disability
worldwide [1]. Although its prevalence decreases after the age of
60, it still affects 7% of women and 3% of men over 65. A successful
treatment of a late-life migraine is particularly important due to the
association with increased risk of ischemic stroke, white matter
lesions and other transient neurological phenomena (migraine
accompaniments) responsive to prophylactic medication
RORSCHACH PERCEPTUAL AND THINKING INDEX (PTI) ASSESSES POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS OF PSYCHOSIS IN ACUTE AND CHRONIC PHASE INDEPENDENTLY OF THE PRESENCE OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC TREATMENT.
Fathoming the kynurenine pathway in migraine: why understanding the enzymatic cascades is still critically important
Kynurenine pathway, the quantitatively main branch of tryptophan metabolism, has been long been considered a source of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, although several of its products, the so-called kynurenines, are endowed with the capacity to activate glutamate receptors, thus potentially influencing a large group of functions in the central nervous system (CNS). Migraine, a largely unknown pathology, is strictly related to the glutamate system in the CNS pathologic terms. Despite the large number of studies conducted on migraine etio-pathology, the kynurenine pathway has been only recently linked to this disease. Nonetheless, some evidence suggests an intriguing role for some kynurenines, and an exploratory study on the serum kynurenine level might be helpful to better understand possible alterations of the kynurenine pathway in patients suffering from migrain
A two years open-label prospective study of OnabotulinumtoxinA 195 U in medication overuse headache. a real-world experience
BACKGROUND:
The efficacy and safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) in adults with chronic migraine (CM) were demonstrated in the PREEMPT program. However, the dosage used in this study was flexible from 155 U to 195 U at the physician's discretion. Therefore, the objective of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy and safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA 195 U vs. 155 U for the treatment of CM and medication overuse headache (MOH) during a 2-year period.
METHODS:
We prospectively evaluated the mean reduction in headache days, migraine days, acute pain medication intake days and Headache Impact Test (HIT)-6 score in 172 patients injected with OnabotulinumtoxinA 195 U. Successively, we compared the efficacy measures with data of 155 patients injected with OnabotulinumtoxinA 155 U and followed up for 2 years. All patients were affected by CM and MOH, and failed one or more previous detoxification and preventative therapies.
RESULTS:
Both OnabotulinumtoxinA 195 U and 155 U reduced significantly the number of headache and migraine days, acute pain medication intake days and HIT-6 score, when compared with the baseline measures. Nevertheless, OnabotulinumtoxinA 195 U proved to be superior of 155 U in all efficacy measures since the first injection and for all the 2 years of treatment, with the exception of the reduction in pain medication intake days that resulted significantly larger with 195 U only after the 4th injection. The safety and tolerability of the two doses were similar and treatment related adverse events were transient and mild-moderate.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study represents the largest and longest post-marketing studies of doses comparison with OnabotulinumtoxinA in a real-life clinical setting. Here, we demonstrate the superior efficacy of OnabotulinumtoxinA 195 U compared to 155 U in CM patients with MOH during a 2-year treatment period with similar safety and tolerability profile
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine. current perspectives
Migraine is a highly disabling neurological pain disorder in which management is frequently problematic. Most abortive and preventative treatments employed are classically non-specific, and their efficacy and safety and tolerability are often unsatisfactory. Mechanism-based therapies are, therefore, needed. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is recognized as crucial in the pathophysiology of migraine, and new compounds that target the peptide have been increasingly explored in recent years. First tested were CGRP receptor antagonists; they proved effective in acute migraine treatment in several trials, but were discontinued due to liver toxicity in long-term administration. Monoclonal antibodies against CGRP (LY2951742, ALD-403, and LBR-101/TEV-48125) or its receptor (AMG334) were subsequently developed. As reviewed in this study, numerous phase 1 and 2 trials and preliminary results of phase 3 trials have shown a good safety/tolerability profile and efficacy in migraine prevention, especially in high frequent episodic and chronic forms. Being macromolecules, these mAbs are not suitable for oral administration; however, their intravenous or subcutaneous delivery can be performed at relatively low frequency-every month or even quarterly-which enhances patients' compliance. Although not all migraineurs respond to this treatment, and longer administration periods will be needed to assess long-term effects, the results so far obtained are extraordinarily promising. The future introduction of mAbs on the market will probably represent a turning point for prevention similar to that represented by triptans for abortive treatment in migraine
Sudden Death Associated with Complex Treatment of Acute Mania: Case Report and Toxicological Findings
Background: Antipsychotic drugs, mood-stabilizers, and sedatives are used rou- tinely to treat acute mania, sometimes in combinations, most of which are poorly evaluated for efficacy and safety. Objective: We report a case of sudden death in a 40-year-old man with acute mania treated aggressively with combinations of drugs that resulted in in potentially toxic, high serum drug concentrations. Methods: After the autopsy, analysis were conducted to determine levels of the adminis- tered medications using GC-MS and LC-MS/MS. Results: Although dosed within recommended ranges, circulating concentrations of some antipsychotic drugs given were excessive, suggesting possible pharmacokinetic interactions. In particular, valproate may have increased serum levels of haloperidol, clozapine, and promazine. The proposed cause of death was cardiac arrest, to which the high concentrations of antipsychotics may have contributed. Conclusion: This case suggests caution in the aggressive treatment of mania with combinations of psychotropic drugs and highlights the need of further clinical studies to identify consequences of drug-drug interactions of antimanic drugs, even when given at recommended doses
Choosing the safest acute therapy during chronic migraine prophylactic treatment. pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations
Introduction: Drugs used in the treatment of migraine have been reported to be highly associated with the occurrence of clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Multiple drug therapy regimens are used for migraine treatment, particularly for chronic migraine. In fact, additional pharmacological agents are usually administered during an acute migraine attack in patients chronically treated with the prophylactic therapy. The variety of drugs available for migraine prophylactic and acute treatment, and consequently their pharmacological interactions, might complicate the choice of a safe combination therapy.Areas covered: This study discusses the prophylactic-Acute DDIs from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective, particularly interactions between antiepileptic drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, triptans, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and ergot derivatives. The available online tools have been used to evaluate the clinically significant DDIs.Expert opinion: The interactions between different drugs might be accurately predicted by the huge and detailed knowledge about the molecular pathways involved in pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. Pharmacogenomic research has shed further light onto the mechanisms involved in the inter-individual variation in drug response and DDIs. Based on this knowledge, this paper will provide suggestions to improve the appropriateness of the drug choice in the prescription of preventative and acute migraine medications
- …
