1,720,955 research outputs found
Biological diversity of Saccharomyces yeasts of spontaneously fermenting wines in four wine regions: Comparative genotypic and phenotypic analysis
Combination of molecular genetic analysis (karyotyping, PCR-RFLP of MET2, the ITS1-ITS2 region and the NTS
region) and physiological examination (melibiose and mannitol utilization, sugar-, ethanol- and copper
tolerance, killer activity, fermentation vigor and production of metabolites) of yeasts isolated from
spontaneously fermenting wines in four wine regions revealed very high diversity in the Saccharomyces
cerevisiae populations. Practically each S. cerevisiae isolate showed a unique pattern of properties. Although
the strains originating from the same wine were quite similar in certain traits, they showed diversity in other
properties. These results indicate that alcoholic fermentation in grape wines is performed by highly diverse
yeast consortia rather than by one or two dominating strains. The less frequent Saccharomyces uvarum
strains were less diverse, showed lower karyotype variability, were Mel+, Man+, more sensitive to 60%
sugar, and ethanol or copper in the medium. They produced less acetic acid and fermented better at 14 °C
than most of the S. cerevisiae isolates, but certain S. cerevisiae strains showed comparably high fermentation
rates at this temperature, indicating that it is not a general rule that S. uvarum ferments better than S.
cerevisiae at low temperatures. The segregation of certain traits (melibiose utilization, mannitol utilization
and copper resistance) in both species indicates that the genomes can easily change during vegetative
propagation. The higher diversity among the S. cerevisiae isolates suggests that the S. cerevisiae genome may
be more flexible than the S. uvarum genome and may allow more efficient adaptation to the continuously
changing environment in the fermenting wine
Polymorphism detection among wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains of different wine origin
In this study, wild Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, isolated from spontaneously fermenting grapes of different varieties and origins, were submitted to genetic analysis using different molecular techniques, such as amplification of genes coding for cell wall proteins and containing minisatellite-like sequences, karyotyping, mtDNA-RFLP, and analysis of the δ region. The lowest discriminative power was obtained by minisatellites analysis, in particular the amplification of AGA1 genes. Karyotyping and mtDNA-RFLP analysis yielded the same differentiation among the strains, whereas the PCR amplification of δ sequences resulted the best method as it was fast and it showed a very high discriminative power. In any case, it has to be underlined that some strains, showing the same delta profiles, exhibited a different mtDNA restriction profile and electrophoretic karyotype, suggesting that more than one molecular marker is required for reliable strain discrimination. Although the techniques used revealed a different resolution power, they all revealed a genetic relationship among strains isolated from spontaneous fermentation of grapes of different origins. In fact, none of the typing methods was able to discriminate some strains isolated from different areas
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
