101,859 research outputs found

    FIGURE 1 in Re-description of the tadpole of Pleurodema somuncurensis (Cei, 1969) (Amphibia: Anura)

    No full text
    FIGURE 1. External morphology and live coloration of a Stage 36 tadpole of Pleurodema somuncurensis (CNP.A-1980). (A) Dorsal, (B) ventral, and (C) lateral views (scale bar = 10 mm). (D) Oral disc (scale bar = 1 mm). (E) From left to right, eye of a Stage 38 tadpole and adult of P. somuncurensis showing the upper and lower meniscus (arrows) (CNP.A-1980 and CNP.A- 1990, respectively). (F) From left to right, eye of a Stage 38 tadpole and adult of P. bufoninum showing the upper and lower meniscus (arrows) (CNP.A-1991 and CNP.A-1996, respectively).Published as part of <i>Barrasso, Diego A., Cotichelli, Leonardo, Alcalde, Leandro & Basso, Néstor G., 2013, Re-description of the tadpole of Pleurodema somuncurensis (Cei, 1969) (Amphibia: Anura), pp. 192-196 in Zootaxa 3681 (2)</i> on page 194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3681.2.10, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10098433">http://zenodo.org/record/10098433</a&gt

    Bibliographie Hilarion G. Petzold 1958 – 2009 mit Anhang als Einführung

    No full text
    Dieses Archiv enthält die Gesamtbibliographie der Werke des Autors nebst einiger Texte „Über H. G. Petzold“ im Schlussteil der Bibliographie sowie einen Anhang mit einer Einführung in die Architektur des Werkes in seinem wissenslogischen Aufbau als Ausarbeitung seines „Tree of Science Modells“ (2007).This archive contains the complete bibliography of the author and some texts about H. G. Petzold, moreover an epilogue with an introduction to the architecture of the works in its epistemological structure and composition and as an elaborations of Petzold’s „Tree of Science Modell (2007).https://www.fpi-publikation.de/polyloge/01-2009-petzold-h-g-gesamtbibliographie-h-g-petzold-1958-2009-updating-november2009/peerReviewedpublishedVersio

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore