1,721,068 research outputs found
Adverbs and adverbial modification
No full textMonographic issue of the "Italian Journal of Linguistics" 12.1, devoted to adverbial synta
Introduction: on adverbs and adverbial modification
No full textIntroduction to the monographic issue of the "Italian Journal of Linguistics" 12.1, devoted to adverbial synta
Feature primitives and the syntax of specificity
No full textThis contribution discusses the interpretive import of cliticization phenomena in Romance and Germanic and scrambling phenomena in Germanic, arguing for the relevance of 'specificity' as a trigger of syntactic operation
Feature primitives and the syntax of specificity
No full textThis contribution addresses the issues posed by types of movement that appear to have a semantic trigger: object-scrambling, cliticization, clitic-doubling, NP-movement, and adjectival agreemen
Feature asymmetry and the nature of pronoun movement
No full textThis contribution investigates the nature of pronoun movement and the trigger for cliticization phenomen
On the nature of pronoun movement
No full textThis contribution addresses the question of what triggers movement of clitic pronouns and weak pronouns in overt syntax. The authors claim that what is crucially involved in overt pronoun movement is the specification for the substantive feature 'human
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
There's that: Unifying existential and list readings
No full textHartmann J. There's that: unifying existential and list readings. In: Broekhuis H, Corver N, Huybregts R, Kleinhenz U, Koster J, eds. Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. Studies in Generative Grammar [SGG]. Vol 86. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter; 2005: 186-196
- …
