1,720,964 research outputs found
High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation vs conventional therapy for patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease responding to first-line therapy. Analysis of clinical characteristics of 51 patients enrolled in the HD01 protocol
Whether high-dose therapy (HDT) plus autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) ought to be included in the initial treatment plan for those patients with unfavourable Hodgkin's disease, a wide cooperative study (HD01 protocol) was approved, comparing HDT followed by ASCT vs conventional chemotherapy (CT). Patients were eligible for the study if they had at least two of the following adverse prognostic factors: high serum LDH levels, mediastinal mass >0.45, more than one extranodal involved site, low hematocrit (<34% for women and <38% for men), and inguinal involvement. Those patients achieving complete or partial remission with four courses of ABVD or ABVD-containing chemotherapy were randomized to receive either HDT plus ASCT or four additional courses of chemotherapy, followed by ASCT in second remission, if appropriate. Between April 1993 and September 1995, 55 patients from 14 different centers have been enrolled into the trial. Twenty patients (45%) were in stage IV, and 37 patients (84%) had systemic symptoms. Twenty-seven patients (61%) had two adverse prognostic factors, and 17 patients (39%) had three or more risk factors. After four cycles of ABVD-containing CT, 44 patients were assessable for response. Overall 12 patients achieved CR (27%), 25 obtained a PR (57%) and seven patients failed to respond (16%). Thirty-six patients were randomized between ASCT (20 patients) or four additional cycles of conventional CT (16 patients). With a median follow-up after ASCT of 13 months (range 1-23 months), no major ASCT-related toxicity has been reported to the trial office. In conclusion, the first 44 patients registered in the HD01 trial and assessable for response, had a very aggressive disease and responded poorly to conventional CT, thus warranting a more aggressive approach, such as HDT followed by ASCT
Preliminary analysis of clinical characteristics of patients enrolled in the HD01 protocol: a randomised trial of high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation versus conventional therapy for patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease responding to first line therapy
this article does not have an abstrac
Treatment of B cell grow grade non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with anti CD20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab. Cancer in the ederly.
no abstrac
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Malattia celiaca e linfoma
Celiac disease (CD) has been acknowledge as being responsible for numerous secondary pathologies, in particular autoimmune and neoplastic diseases. Whether CD is more prevalent in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) than in the normal population is not known. Accordingly, we carried out a study of 86 patients hospitalized in the Section of Oncology, Haematology and Internal Medicine of the Department of Medical, Oncological and Radiological Sciences of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and who, between 1988 and 1995 had been diagnosed as affected by NHL. On diagnosis, and before the beginning of antitumour therapy, all the patients were tested for antigliadin (AGA IgA and IgG) and antiendomysium (EMA) antibodies together with total class IgA antibody levels. Our findings showed that none of the 86 patients had an IgA deficit, while one tested positive for AGA IgA (43.9% v.n. < 7.5). The same patient also tested positive for EMA. The extremely high sensitivity and specificity of the AGA IgA and EMA led us to conclude that the patient was affected by CD, although his early death precluded confirmation by biopsy. The presence of one celiac patient among 86 NHL patients examined at the onset of the disease would suggest that CD is not infrequent in NHL. The numbers involved in our study are insufficient for statistical purposes, and we are therefore awaiting the results of a SIGEP multi-centre study into the connection between CD and lymphomas
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
