1,721,079 research outputs found
CJAR JOURNAL NOVEMBER 2020 SPECIAL ISSUE
No full textSPECIAL ISSUE ON
Multidisciplinary Social Sciences, Science, Engineering, and Business.
NOVEMBER 2020
DOI NUMBER: www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4379373
COMMONWEALTH JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH (CJAR)
( www.cjar.eu )
CJAR: An Commonwealth & European International Multidisciplinary Research Journal.
ISSN: 2708-4841 (Online), 2708-7042 (Print)
Impact Factor: I2OR = 3.425 (Year: 2020)
Editor in Chief: Dr. Rejaul Abedin, PhD, FCMAN
Impact Factor: I2OR = 3.425 (Year: 2020)
Frequency: Monthly
Country: Austria
Language: English
Starting Year: 2020
CJAR JOURNAL NOVEMBER 2020 SPECIAL ISSUE
BELONGS TO IJARBAS JOURNAL AND RESPECTIVE AUTHORS.
COMMONWEALTH JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH (CJAR) ®
( www.cjar.eu )
For the Special Issue, please visit the following WebLink Address:
OR FOR SPECIAL ISSUE'S ONLINE FULL VERSION, CAN BE VISITED HERE>>>
https://www.cjar.eu/2020/11/30/cjar-journal-november-2020-special-issue/
DOI: www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4379373
Or
Search on CJAR.EU in “Search” Box by writing “CJAR JOURNAL NOVEMBER 2020 SPECIAL ISSUE”
~~~ VOLUME: 1, ISSUE: 8, NOVEMBER 2020 ! ~~~
Many thanks for reading & Staying with CJAR Journal.
Editor-In-Chief, CJAR.EU, ISSN: 2708-4841 (Online), 2708-7042 (Print)
European & African Studies Multidisciplinary International Journal,
Email: [email protected] Web: https://www.cjar.eu
CJAR is a publishing initiative of TWCMSI.ORG and
CJAR INTERNATIONALThis Special Issue has been published at www.cjar.eu , Issue#8, Volume#1, November 2020
CJAR is on Twitter
No full textThe Canadian Journal of Action research is on Twitter now! Follow @journal_action to stay connected. Join the online community of action researchers and teachers to stay engaged with projects as they happen. By following CJAR on Twitter, you will be among the first to learn about opportunities to publish and present
American Educational Research Association Special Interest Group: Action Research Annual Conference, April 17-21, 2020, San Francisco, USA
No full textThe AERA Action Research (AR) SIG will be meeting in San Francisco, CA in April 17-21, 2020.
Link to information: https://www.aera.net/Events-Meetings/Annual-Meeting/2020-Annual-Meeting-Theme 
Call for Abstracts
No full textThe Action Research Network of the Americas (ARNA) in partnership with Yellowhead Tribal College (YTC), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
ARNA and YTC are very pleased to announce that YTC will host ARNA’s 11th Annual Conference as a hybrid event from May 30 – June 2, 2023 at the Yellowhead Tribal College in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The Call for Abstracts includes both ARNA’s traditional conference topics as well as a range of topics focused on this year’s theme: Land-Based Knowledge and Action Research. The deadline for abstract submissions is March 13, 2023.
Please see the attached PDF for details
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Get PDFWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
