1,720,975 research outputs found
An optimization–diversification approach to portfolio selection
The classical approaches to optimal portfolio selection call for finding a feasible portfolio that optimizes a risk measure, or a gain measure, or a combination thereof by means of a utility function or of a performance measure. However, the optimization approach tends to amplify the estimation errors on the parameters required by the model, such as expected returns and covariances. For this reason, the Risk Parity model, a novel risk diversification approach to portfolio selection, has been recently theoretically developed and used in practice, mainly for the case of the volatility risk measure. Here we first provide new theoretical results for the Risk Parity approach for general risk measures. Then we propose a novel framework for portfolio selection that combines the diversification and the optimization approaches through the global solution of a hard nonlinear mixed integer or pseudo Boolean problem. For the latter problem we propose an efficient and accurate Multi-Greedy heuristic that extends the classical single-threaded greedy approach to a multiple-threaded setting. Finally, we provide empirical results on real-world data showing that the diversified optimal portfolios are only slightly suboptimal in-sample with respect to optimal portfolios, and generally show improved out-of-sample performance with respect to their purely diversified or purely optimized counterparts
Maximum risk diversification for portfolio selection
We consider a new measure of diversification for a portfolio of risky assets, and we address the problem of finding portfolios with maximum diversification, possibly with the addition of return constraints. The diversification measure is based on a convexity gap between the risk of a convex combination of assets and the convex combination of their risks. We first provide some theoretical results on this diversification measure, and we establish connections with the Herfindahl index for risk. Then we formulate the portfolio diversification model for several risk measures. Finally, we provide some preliminary computational results
Robustification of sample-and-hold controllers for the consensus problem
Robustification of controllers for the consensus problem of multi-agent systems (MASs) with actuator disturbances is analysed in this work. If a general consensus protocol is available for the disturbances-free system, a new sampled-data control law guarantees the agreement, in the sample-and-hold sense, with arbitrarily large and bounded actuator disturbance. Also the observation error is investigated. The agent drift dynamics are required to be globally Lipschitz and bounded. A numerical simulation example is finally proposed to validate the results
A new family of modified Gaussian copulas for market consistent valuation of government guarantees
This paper deals with a copula-based stochastic dependence problem in the context of financial risks. We discuss the financial framework for assessing the theoretical up-front value of government guarantees on bank liabilities. EU States widely use these contracts to improve the financial system’s stability and manage the banking sector in crisis situations; in Italy, they have also been used to address the consequences of the Covid-19 emergency. From a market viewpoint, we deal with a defaultable guarantee contract where the State-guarantor and the bank-borrower are both subject to default risk, and their risks are interconnected. We show that the classical Gaussian copula is not satisfactory for modeling the dependence among the considered risks. Indeed, using the benchmark market model for credit risk portfolio management, we highlight some contradictory results observed for the up-front values of the guarantee when the default intensity of the guarantor is smaller than that of the borrower. Then, we introduce a new family of modified Gaussian copulas that overcomes the limitations of the standard approach, allowing to determine realistic results in terms of the guarantees “mark-to-model” value when the benchmark market model does not work. Numerical simulations validate the theoretical proposal
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
