1,721,138 research outputs found

    The Perspective of Domestic Legal Systems. Report on Italy

    No full text
    In this article, the Author provides an overview of the Italian approach towards evidence gathered abroad. In particular, he analyses national exclusionary rules, as shaped by the Italian case law. The major issue addressed by the Author is the respect of defence rights, as well as of the adversary principle, and critical remarks are therefore expounded concerning the features of such an approach. Furthermore, new developing modalities of cooperation between judicial authorities are taken into consideration in this article. In this regard, the Author argues that a legislative intervention, balancing efficiency and individuals’ rights, might overcome present lacks and shortcomings

    Editorial of Dossier “Criminal res iudicata, principle of legality, principle of culpability”

    Full text link
    What’s the meaning of the locution “medesimo fatto” in the Art. 649 of the Italian Criminal Procedure Code, that regulates the ne bis in idem principle (double jeopardy clause)? The fact object of the second judgment must be considered on its exclusively naturalistic dimension, no matter what the juridical qualification is according to the criminal law rules? In which measure the prohibition of second judgment operates when the criminal law rules tolerate the duplication of the sanctioning treatment, or when the legal system determines for the same fact, beyond penalty sanctions, administrative or civil punishment of considerable gravity? In which measure the conviction by definitive sentence is subject to revision based on wrong facts evaluation about the responsibility of the accused? Do the criminal sentences which inflict an illegal penalty or that condemn the accused for a fact that is not provided by law as a crime, have execution power? The author deals with these and other similar issues – widely discussed on Italian criminal procedure – in order to stimulate the debate about the theme of criminal res iudicata, on the general perspective and, more specifically, focusing on its relations with the principles of culpability and legality

    Indagini preliminari e udienza preliminare

    No full text
    Illustrazione e analisi critica della disciplina delle indagini preliminari e dell'udienza preliminare (artt. 326-437 del codice di procedura penale

    Commento all'art. 606 c.p.p

    No full text
    Commento all'art. 606 del codice di procedura penale (motivi di ricorso per cassazione

    Brevi note sul progetto Gratteri di riforma della disciplina delle intercettazioni

    Full text link
    Sommario 1. Una discutibile manovra compensativa. — 2. Il superamento del “doppio binario” (a esclusivo vantaggio degli inquirenti). — 3. Le barriere (sempre più fragili) dell’intimità domiciliare. — 4. “Purché nulla trapeli all’esterno”. — 5. Un interlocutore necessari

    Prime considerazioni sul proscioglimento per particolare tenuità del fatto

    No full text
    Gli artt. 1-5 del d.lgs. 16 marzo 2015, n. 28 hanno dato attuazione alla direttiva di legge delega contenuta nell’art. 1 comma 1 lett. m della legge 28 aprile 2014, n. 67, che invitava il governo a «escludere la punibilità di condotte sanzionate con la sola pena pecuniaria o con pene detentive non superiori nel massimo a cinque anni, quando risulti la particolare tenuità dell’offesa e la non abitualità del comportamento». Nel contributo la riforma viene analizzata nei suoi numerosi aspetti problematici: proiezione funzionale dell’istituto, natura giuridica, presupposti applicativi, risvolti processuali, rapporti con l’azione civile di risarcimento del danno
    corecore